Gunpack?

[Neil]

They put an update out when they do the gunpack..


Not hard. You get the view the guns. Once you unlock them (Placed randomly through out levels) If you try put it on your class


" You Do not have the recommended downloadable content to use this weapon click here to buy"

done.

not hard.

You keep trying to convince yourself, the truth is it's not happening, it's just too much hassle just so people can have extra guns and to be honest anyone sad enough to pay money just for guns on a game is pathetic.

It's obvious IW are gonna release map packs and apparently callsign stuff for MW2 then save all the good stuff for MW3 so they can squeeze more money out of everyone, it works every other time, I'm not even gonna waste my money on this game anymore, I'll wait until Treyarch release CoD7 for something new because at least they make the CoD games how they're meant to be still. ¬¬

[dbgtz]

Youre saying the game has robbed squeezed us of money? The game itself hasn't IMO, loads of people get lots of entertainment from it, it's just loads of things were milked like the ghost monster juice thing and stuff. You're saying DLC is a bad thing when it keeps most companies afloat, considering the cost of discs (blurays being more expensive too), the staff at the devs and publishers. Although activision/IW could have included more in their collectors editions. I mean for £70, with the hardened you got the game in a a steelbook, cod 1 and a small artbook. With the Assassins creed BE (same price) you got the game in normal casing, a decent sized (dunno exact size) figurine, larger artbook, ingame dlc, avatar dlc, some tracks & extras, a cool scenery on the box and generally a nice box with embedded stuff on it.

Activision are greedy but DLC is how most companies keep afloat.

And whats your "definition" of a cod game, sticking to the same old shooting boring stuff with the same guns and the same scenerys, oh what fun.

[Neil]

Youre saying the game has robbed squeezed us of money? The game itself hasn't IMO, loads of people get lots of entertainment from it, it's just loads of things were milked like the ghost monster juice thing and stuff. You're saying DLC is a bad thing when it keeps most companies afloat, considering the cost of discs (blurays being more expensive too), the staff at the devs and publishers. Although activision/IW could have included more in their collectors editions. I mean for £70, with the hardened you got the game in a a steelbook, cod 1 and a small artbook. With the Assassins creed BE (same price) you got the game in normal casing, a decent sized (dunno exact size) figurine, larger artbook, ingame dlc, avatar dlc, some tracks & extras, a cool scenery on the box and generally a nice box with embedded stuff on it.

Activision are greedy but DLC is how most companies keep afloat.

And whats your "definition" of a cod game, sticking to the same old shooting boring stuff with the same guns and the same scenerys, oh what fun.

No IW squeeze money out of you, I never said the game did. :rolleyes:

Ever since CoD4 the franchise has become crap anyway, CoD2 was the perfect CoD game, the multiplayer had one flaw and that was grenade spam, there was no perks, no kill streaks, no ranks, I don't even think they had a leaderboard, no way to track anything, it was just the core game, not the crap that has come from CoD4, they're ruining their own franchise by expanding the audience and make the game easier in general, CoD was always looked at for being really diffcult and now anyone can finish veteran with little to no problems, at least Treyarch got WaW right.

To be honest as far as I'm concerned "Modern Warfare" is a failure to the franchise, obviously as a product it's certainly succedded but it's not what the previous games are, hopefully IW will leave at MW3 and let Treyarch do all the work, least it's a hope of getting rid of all the 16 year old babies that QQ everytime they make a CoD game that isn't modern.

Also I don't mind DLC, I am happy to pay for map packs, I'm happy to pay for additional missions and such but for callsigns and guns is just plain stupid, same for collectors, I have no problems with collectors versions of games, unless it's one that's stupid and lets the people who pay extra have an unfair advantage, like giving them a code that unlocks all the guns or something.

[dbgtz]

In a sense I agree with leaving MW3 as the last (but obv IW staying), overwise it will be milked more then WWII.

Also to me WAW was awful, so many bugs and errors. I liked it don't get me wrong but y'no, I prefer MW more I guess.

[Jord]

I doubt they'll add more callsigns and stuff to be honest, a map pack or two perhaps but I doubt it'll go beyond that, it wouldn't work at all if you had players who don't have the gun pack in games with players that do, not going to happen.

You keep trying to convince yourself, the truth is it's not happening, it's just too much hassle just so people can have extra guns and to be honest anyone sad enough to pay money just for guns on a game is pathetic.

It's obvious IW are gonna release map packs and apparently callsign stuff for MW2 then save all the good stuff for MW3 so they can squeeze more money out of everyone, it works every other time, I'm not even gonna waste my money on this game anymore, I'll wait until Treyarch release CoD7 for something new because at least they make the CoD games how they're meant to be still. ¬¬

Please recap anywhere where I said it was true?

This thread is "What If"

People would pay for a map pack Is that pathetic? No. It adds up to more entertainment.

Map pack = More maps to play on.

Which is more entertainment

Gunpack = More Guns to use.

Which is even more entertainment due to new items.

[Accipiter]

i want a new perk where you can use a ghillie with any gun that should be added in a dlc

[Jord]

i want a new perk where you can use a ghillie with any gun that should be added in a dlc

LOL

That would annoy me so much with the campers hiding in the grass waiting for someone to pass the hole game going 1-0

[Neil]

Please recap anywhere where I said it was true?

This thread is "What If"

People would pay for a map pack Is that pathetic? No. It adds up to more entertainment.

Map pack = More maps to play on.

Which is more entertainment

Gunpack = More Guns to use.

Which is even more entertainment due to new items.

Can't you read or does living in Hackney actually lower your IQ? I said I was fine with map packs, that does add replay value, guns however add no replay value, who gets back into a game because the model on the screen is slightly different from all the other models? Buying guns is pathetic, end.

Also I never said you said it was true but you seem awfully defensive about something that you say is a "what if". :rolleyes:

[Jord]

Can't you read or does living in Hackney actually lower your IQ? I said I was fine with map packs, that does add replay value, guns however add no replay value, who gets back into a game because the model on the screen is slightly different from all the other models? Buying guns is pathetic, end.

Also I never said you said it was true but you seem awfully defensive about something that you say is a "what if". :rolleyes:

Guns do add replay value. I went on CoD4 Today for the M40A3

Which is a gun if you havnt noticed

I also Dont give 2 ***** about replay value I want GUN PACK FOR NOW

NOW NOW NOW

Not in the future NOW

Once mw2 is gone and then next cod game is out I am never touching it again. It is a BAD game

But I play it to make MONEY.

[Jahova]

I would pay Would be nice.