Would you like a 'middle man' to be designated for pin trades in this forum?

[Arch]

Exactly, so therefore this won't be put into action.

^ That was directed towards scottish's comment.

[Stryderman]

Exactly, so therefore this won't be put into action.

^ That was directed towards scottish's comment.

If thats the case they would have to stop all pin trades all rs cash for hab all international hotel trades and donater for hab trades..

[Arch]

Yes but by allowing someone from the Habbox team be the MM they support it don't they and im pretty sure Catzsy already said basically this a some posts ago.

[Stryderman]

Yes but by allowing someone from the Habbox team be the MM they support it don't they and im pretty sure Catzsy already said basically this a some posts ago.

Yeh but then by also allowing it on their site they are supporting it as they are not doing anything to prevent it, Thats why i thought it was allowed as acc trading is not [as thats against habbo way] and that would mean if this is not allowed nothing else would be.

[[Jay]]

I did not think of it that way to be honest, however I have to agree with Pos in this one as long as the MM is a user and not staff then there should not be a problem. However if it is a a member of staff then that could be a problem.

[Hecktix]

Perhaps we could work out some sort of democratic system to elect a middleman?

[Orangeesh]

I did not think of it that way to be honest, however I have to agree with Pos in this one as long as the MM is a user and not staff then there should not be a problem. However if it is a a member of staff then that could be a problem.

A normal member has nothing to lose at all so the chance's of them scamming is alot higher than if a staff member was elected. At least they have something to lose, and using a staff member who is a super moderator or admin would be best as I very much doubt they would scam anyone.

[Stryderman]

Yeh you couldnt use a normal user & if you did who would you choose?

Then youd have people whining over im safer than them let me be mm etc etc

[Callum.]

Perhaps we could work out some sort of democratic system to elect a middleman?

worst idea ever. it has to be staff to work, look at the section at the moment, no body has actually traded for months/years for most people active so no one is amazingly trusted. it'd have to be staff for it to even remotely work. but then you probably can't hire someone/use existing staff because you're encouraging others to break the rules.

before we had just been left on our own. if we got scammed theres nothing you could do but warn people.

A normal member has nothing to lose at all so the chance's of them scamming is alot higher than if a staff member was elected. At least they have something to lose, and using a staff member who is a super moderator or admin would be best as I very much doubt they would scam anyone.

but staff can probably not be the MM as a few have said above.

[Stryderman]

worst idea ever. it has to be staff to work, look at the section at the moment, no body has actually traded for months/years for most people active so no one is amazingly trusted. it'd have to be staff for it to even remotely work. but then you probably can't hire someone/use existing staff because you're encouraging others to break the rules.

before we had just been left on our own. if we got scammed theres nothing you could do but warn people.

Except everytime you "warn" people you get infracted for saying they scam so your back to square 1