Would you like to be able to have a picture of yourself in your avatar?

[today]

To add, if the majority of users wouldn't want to put their picture as their avatar, whats the point in allowing it for a small group of members?

Why fix what isn't broken?

Cause habbox wants to be the new facebook and break everything the users dont want to break? :}

/Sad ref.

[-:Undertaker:-]

why am i against it? because i want sierks wishes to be respected. makes the forum look tacky. i don't want to have to endure other people. there is a thread for it. if you go in there you're perfectly aware you might see people that make you sick. i don't want to have a little bit of vomit in my mouth everytime i see some users post.

Other people on here have complained about the amount of pictures of Zac Efron and co. in signatures and avatars - people who use Habbox Forum a lot more than sierk does. It seems to me like a lot of people on here like to stop other users having something because they personally don't want to use it.

To add, if the majority of users wouldn't want to put their picture as their avatar, whats the point in allowing it for a small group of members?

Whats the point in not allowing it? - theres no major issue/opposition point to oppose it other than the childish point 'I DONT WANT IT COS I JUST DONT'.

[today]

Other people on here have complained about the amount of pictures of Zac Efron and co. in signatures and avatars - people who use Habbox Forum a lot more than sierk does. It seems to me like a lot of people on here like to stop other users having something because they personally don't want to use it.

Jake generally speaks for the forum though on this subject

[Hecktix]

Cause habbox wants to be the new facebook and break everything the users dont want to break? :}

/Sad ref.

That's precisely what I don't want this forum to turn into.

[today]

Generally it's a forum, there's a thread to post yourself, and just have facebook in ya sig if you want people to perv on you that much god.

[kk.]

why am i against it? because i want sierks wishes to be respected. makes the forum look tacky. i don't want to have to endure other people. there is a thread for it. if you go in there you're perfectly aware you might see people that make you sick. i don't want to have a little bit of vomit in my mouth everytime i see some users post.

so whats the difference between having my avatar, and a person adding their own picture?

[Immenseman]

yeah, you look at the thread you look at the poll

i thought you liked UKIP, if they were to come to power and do all their referendums, the outcome might not be what you think.

[today]

so whats the difference between having my avatar, and a person adding their own picture?

None, if your ugly.. (joke.)

Cause one avatar is alright, but if it was allowed then there'll be alot more then one ugly avatar lol.

[-:Undertaker:-]

so whats the difference between having my avatar, and a person adding their own picture?

There isn't a difference, well I suppose "some members may not like it for unknown reasons" or "the majority wouldn't use it anyway" is the so-called 'difference'. Some people on here just need to relax and just let things happen rather than treating & analysing the smallest and most unimportant of decisions like a scientific body would.

yeah, you look at the thread you look at the poll

i thought you liked UKIP, if they were to come to power and do all their referendums, the outcome might not be what you think.

If the poll has the outcome I don't like then I accept that; it doesn't mean I can't put across my opinion/argument or challenge why members are not allowed to have their picture as their avatar. With opinion polling comes debate & discussion.

[Immenseman]

so whats the difference between having my avatar, and a person adding their own picture?

cuz i know you're fit so it doesn't count