Would you like to be able to have a picture of yourself in your avatar?

[kk.]

None, if your ugly.. (joke.)

Cause one avatar is alright, but if it was allowed then there'll be alot more then one ugly avatar lol.

;l omg
but thats the thing, anyone can have any avatar. all the people who voted yes or indifferent could get a really ugly person and shove it in their avatar, and youd be in at least a worse situation than you would have been if you allow people to post themselves..

There isn't a difference, well I suppose "some members may not like it for unknown reasons" or "the majority wouldn't use it anyway" is the so-called 'difference'. Some people on here just need to relax and just let things happen rather than treating & analysing the smallest and most unimportant of decisions like a scientific body would.

exactly.

cuz i know you're fit so it doesn't count

yh but that doesnt come into this
my point is, everyone can have whatever avatar they like, providing its not of themselves (or anotehr member). If everyone was to choose something disgusting, then surely thats the 'worst case scenario' that everyones saying, people having avatars they dont want to look at?


i think the above has proved my point well. Theres no difference between my avatar, and someone who would have an avatar of themselves

[Immenseman]

r u calling that guy u found on google (my cousin) ugly?

[today]

;l omg
but thats the thing, anyone can have any avatar. all the people who voted yes or indifferent could get a really ugly person and shove it in their avatar, and youd be in at least a worse situation than you would have been if you allow people to post themselves..


exactly.


yh but that doesnt come into this
my point is, everyone can have whatever avatar they like, providing its not of themselves (or anotehr member). If everyone was to choose something disgusting, then surely thats the 'worst case scenario' that everyones saying, people having avatars they dont want to look at?


i think the above has proved my point well. Theres no difference between my avatar, and someone who would have an avatar of themselves

Cause not everyone's gonna go find munter's and have them as avatars, where as if you can uplaod your own pics everyone/most will 'for the joy of a new feature'

[kk.]

r u calling that guy u found on google (my cousin) ugly?

yh (he kinda looks like you actually lmaoooo)
jks tho

Cause not everyone's gonna go find munter's and have them as avatars, where as if you can uplaod your own pics everyone/most will 'for the joy of a new feature'

but theres nothing stopping them. which is also my point. Anyone can have anything as their avatar, even ugly things, yes things ;l.

[today]

yh (he kinda looks like you actually lmaoooo)
jks tho


but theres nothing stopping them. which is also my point. Anyone can have anything as their avatar, even ugly things, yes things ;l.

yer but they wont though lol.

[kk.]

but they could though lol.

[today]

but they wont though lol.

[Sharon]

Yes - but people would fake a picture anyway

We have the best pic tracers!!! Scottish can find u. Already been done

mehh they're just stupid ***** if they did.

[Black_Apalachi]

the other thread should be reopened. It looked like management had given up arguing because they had no definitive answer as to why we're not allowed, and how they could tell if it was actually you, or just a random person

also, i agree that the title is worded wrongly, as well as basically saying

The results of this thread does not matter, we're not changing the rules

Like I said (can't remember in which thread), you shouldn't be allowed to ave an avatar of anyone who isn't famous because there's always the chance they will register on the forum (or even just browse the forum) and be offended. I don't see why the rule of 'it is not allowed to have other members in your avatar' should not apply to 'other people' full stop.

lols!!! "THE POLL ISN'T GOING THE WAY I WANTED IT TOO" re-word it NOW!!

it's fine as it is btw

LMAO exactly :L

[Blinger1]

couldn't care less.