UKIP candidate suspended over racist comments

[Tintinnabulate]

Its a negative comment, but its not racist as you suggest as racist is discriminating based on somebodies race, a bit like the Labour Party has a candidate shortlist policy based on race or did you not know that?

Would you care to point out which UKIP policies incite racism or discrimination?



Indeed.



Where does 'our dear leader' say this?

As for the all muslims, he did not say all muslims in the quote you have provided unless you have mistakeninly quoted him, he said all left wing scum but did not say all muslims, check your quote and i'll reconsider that then as its a very stupid comment if he did say that all muslims were nutters, not that its not a generalising and petty remark anyway.

Its amazing how far you will go to defend racist scums that is UKIP.

Where does 'our dear leader' say this?

You stated you had read the Telegraph article?

Lord Pearson said that while the language that he used was “clearly unacceptable, the subject he raised should be the subject of national debate”.

There you go.

[-:Undertaker:-]

Its amazing how far you will go to defend racist scums that is UKIP.

You stated you had read the Telegraph article?

There you go.

1) I am simply asking you for racist/discriminatory policies of UKIP to be listed, so far you have failed to list any.

2) I have read the article, however you have worded it as though Lord Pearson agrees that muslims are nutters, which he has not said or agrees with hence why he suspended this man from his post. He has said that he agress a debate is needed on the issue which revolves around immigration.

[jrh2002]

Wow Sounds like a top bloke to me. +Rep to the UKIP man.

[Catzsy]

1) I am simply asking you for racist/discriminatory policies of UKIP to be listed, so far you have failed to list any.

2) I have read the article, however you have worded it as though Lord Pearson agrees that muslims are nutters,] which he has not said or agrees with hence why he suspended this man from his post. He has said that he agress a debate is needed on the issue which revolves around immigration.

That's the problem. They can't see to get any realistic perspective. If he has said extremist terrorist muslims who want to bomb and kill people using their faith as an excuse that would be fine. I also think there should be a debate about immigration then we will see exactly what they mean or don't mean.

[Technologic]

This is what i hate about UKIP, they're all foul mouthed fools with no respect.

[Swastika]

Dander, why do you keep making threads against UKIP?
Get into politics or something rather than spamming the current afairs section with anti-UKIP threads.

[Tash.]

Dander, why do you keep making threads against UKIP?
Get into politics or something rather than spamming the current afairs section with anti-UKIP threads.

I hate to say this, but these threads are really quite few when you look at how many threads are posted daily jumping on every miniscule thing the Labour Party does wrong by certain members. He can post whatever he wants, the same as those other members have.

On topic: Frankly what he wrote was deplorable, vile and very misinformed. I can't say i'd want anyone capable of spouting such rubbish representing me for anything.

[Swastika]

Fair play to you, but to be quite honest, i think people have quite a right to be angry at what labour has done for the country, or should i say not done?
What this UKIP fella has said could quite easily be seen as racist, but Dander is quite obviously getting as much anti-UKIP information as possible and posting it because he clearly see's UKIP as a threat.
I mean, look at his signature, does that not have "i believe UKIP are a threat" written all over it?

I hate to say this, but these threads are really quite few when you look at how many threads are posted daily jumping on every miniscule thing the Labour Party does wrong by certain members. He can post whatever he wants, the same as those other members have.

On topic: Frankly what he wrote was deplorable, vile and very misinformed. I can't say i'd want anyone capable of spouting such rubbish representing me for anything.

[Tash.]

Fair play to you, but to be quite honest, i think people have quite a right to be angry at what labour has done for the country, or should i say not done?
What this UKIP fella has said could quite easily be seen as racist, but Dander is quite obviously getting as much anti-UKIP information as possible and posting it because he clearly see's UKIP as a threat.
I mean, look at his signature, does that not have "i believe UKIP are a threat" written all over it?

Not really, UKIP aren't a threat, but members on here wish to speak about them so they become an issue. Fortunately, the members who support them on this forum aren't representative of society or we'd be in big big trouble. His signature is in reaction to another members.

And no, his comments cannot be seen as racist, they are racist. There's no getting away from that.

[Tintinnabulate]

Dander, why do you keep making threads against UKIP?
Get into politics or something rather than spamming the current afairs section with anti-UKIP threads.

I made what? 2 threads in a year about UKIP? And both were articles from newspapers which UKIP supporters ensured they didnt post. However, they will post anything minor which is bad about Labour.

I mean, look at his signature, does that not have "i believe UKIP are a threat" written all over it?

Threat? Seriously? You obviously know zero about politics if you honestly think they are a threat. My signature was in reply to Undertakers signature. Stop crying just because you support UKIP and I don't.

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=638596

OMG A THREAD AGAINST LABOUR. You aren't flaming that person? Oh wait that's correct, its flaming Labour, not UKIP. How can you tell people off for posting bad things about other parties.

So Jayme, stop being pathetic.