I think a simple clarification of the current pointless posting rule for Moderators would suffice, rather than pointlessly changing the rule altogether.
I think a simple clarification of the current pointless posting rule for Moderators would suffice, rather than pointlessly changing the rule altogether.
Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini
Yeha, like a thread in mod forum or something would do the job
I was warned for:
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...89#post6459089
and the rule quoted was:
My post was relevant to the previous post thus wasn't a pointless post. I think the rules need to be clarified for Moderators again or they need to be less strict as even if the rules were strict, I shouldnt have been warned as it was revelant to the previous post. But yeah, Oli is sorting itA6. Do not post pointlessly ~ A pointless post has no relevance to the topic, any previous post that is relevant, is meaningless (ghnrgher etc) or does little to contribute to the discussion..
I think the majority of our moderators know how to apply the current rules but I will clarify.
I've not had any problems with pointless posting (until these instances tonight) which means they're clearly doing something right![]()
"You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"
RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.
Retired from Habbox May 2011
looks like that danzooo fella needs some moderation lessons
Edited by Bolt660 (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not target or be negative towards other forum members.
Last edited by Martin; 14-05-2010 at 11:26 PM.
Don't be mean kyle, it's confusing! Also, what has confused me more, in the PM about my usernote being removed I was told they were on the verge of breaking the rules, lol. They either are or aren't.
Another idea I was thinking of is allowing new members to have a slightly bigger avatar. When I registered a new account last month, I didn't bother having an avatar as 90x100 is quite small.
and yeah Jake, I just got the same PM.
Last edited by Tintinnabulate; 14-05-2010 at 11:07 PM.
lmao innit, i had an av, saw how small it was and quickly removed
Well no, there is something called borderline, Jake.
I think 90x100 is fine, although I always wondered why it was not 100x100.
"You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"
RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.
Retired from Habbox May 2011
Yeah but with that rule, Oli they are replying to another post in that thread therefore not borderline unless I misunderstood the rule.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!