Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: Security Suites

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LukeBateson View Post
    Hmm, out of MS Security Essentials and ESET SS, which uses less resources?
    I think they're both pretty low on resources hence they're so popular. MSE is an anti-virus, ESET SS is a security suite so chances are MSE is lower on resources. But the bottom line is you can't compare the two and they're both low on resources

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    D?sseldorf
    Posts
    2,858
    Tokens
    2,256

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Fair doos, think i'll just go with MS then.

    Cheers everyone
    +rep to all *if i can*
    EDIT: Sorry Tom and Jordy, gotta spread (N)
    Last edited by Luke; 15-05-2010 at 01:58 PM.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    655
    Tokens
    50

    Default

    Hmm, out of MS Security Essentials and ESET SS, which uses less resources?
    I'd rather trust a different company, other than the one with the security holes in the first place.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    6,444
    Tokens
    6,671

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apolva View Post
    I'd rather trust a different company, other than the one with the security holes in the first place.
    Errrrr what?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    655
    Tokens
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stephenHi View Post
    Errrrr what?
    I'd rather ESSET/Kasp. over Microsoft.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apolva View Post
    I'd rather ESSET/Kasp. over Microsoft.
    That's pretty naive :/ Security holes vary with software, you do realise? The OS is just one part of a problem. An OS company cannot insure software companies can protect their software to use with their operating system. Take Firefox for example, users pick up viruses all the time and Microsoft hear of these attacks, so it's quite wise of them to create an anti-virus of their own because they understand where the vulnerabilities are. Firefox, or more clearly, Mozilla are to blame for any vulnerabilities that may harm the user, which is why Mozilla also release patches and security updates. It's probably why Windows 7 is quite a secure OS compared to older operating systems or the competition, seeing as Microsoft are now looking into vulnerabilities and understand how they work. I think they may also keep in close contact with other anti-virus companies, sharing information with them and vice versa.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    /etc/passwd
    Posts
    19,110
    Tokens
    1,139

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apolva View Post
    I'd rather trust a different company, other than the one with the security holes in the first place.
    You do realise, Linux, MacOS, FreeBSD, Windows, DOS, whatever, you name it, it'll have security flaws.

    Everything humans make has a flaw somewhere.
    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    e-rebel forum moderator
    :8

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    655
    Tokens
    50

    Default

    I'm not talking about vulnerabilities in other software, clearly it is the fault of the software vendor for these.

    No software's perfect, but seeing as Microsoft don't exactly have a clean record for addressing bugs as they are found (IE for example), I would think twice about using their security software.
    Last edited by Apolva; 15-05-2010 at 03:34 PM.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    6,444
    Tokens
    6,671

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Your thoughts are quite funny. Glad you aren't a software reviewer.

    "This software is going to be buggy as hell because they made this other software which was buggy
    1/10"

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    /etc/passwd
    Posts
    19,110
    Tokens
    1,139

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apolva View Post
    I'm not talking about vulnerabilities in other software, clearly it is the fault of the software vendor for these.

    No software's perfect, but seeing as Microsoft don't exactly have a clean record for addressing bugs as they are found (IE for example), I would think twice about using their security software.
    Unfortunatly Apple are the same, so the two major software vendors are as bad as each other.

    Apple left an issue where using the guest account would wipe your other user account files for months on end, they also had the first machine to go down at the Pwn2Own hacking competition
    Quote Originally Posted by Chippiewill View Post
    e-rebel forum moderator
    :8

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •