Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 44
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    North England
    Posts
    5,718
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Form and fitness would dictate that Bent > Defoe.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    6,050
    Tokens
    1,435

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Browney View Post
    Form and fitness would dictate that Bent > Defoe.
    Bent just isn't good enough. Teams have to revolve around him.


    Image removed by Bolt660 (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have images in your signature which exceed the maximum limits for your usergroup.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    North England
    Posts
    5,718
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    What evidence do you have that he is not good enough? And Manchester United and England revolve around Rooney. Does that mean those teams are poor? No, it means they know the system. If you read my post, I propose we start with Heskey and Rooney. Then, if Rooney gets tired or needs to be subbed (especially in the group stages) we take him off for Bent. We play with Heskey upfront, creating room for Bent, Bent stretches tired teams and statistics show he's more likely to score than Defoe.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    6,050
    Tokens
    1,435

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Browney View Post
    What evidence do you have that he is not good enough? And Manchester United and England revolve around Rooney. Does that mean those teams are poor? No, it means they know the system. If you read my post, I propose we start with Heskey and Rooney. Then, if Rooney gets tired or needs to be subbed (especially in the group stages) we take him off for Bent. We play with Heskey upfront, creating room for Bent, Bent stretches tired teams and statistics show he's more likely to score than Defoe.
    All the other strikers are cleverer than him. Capello has picked two pacey players and two players who hold the ball up. England revolve around Rooney because he is one of the best in the world, Darren Bent isn't.

    I just don't think he is generally good enough and the other strikers do their jobs better. Darren Bent is fairly limited in how he plays, yes he scores goals, but he's not good enough imo. Defoe is probably only going to play when Rooney doesn't, he also has a tried and tested partnership with Crouch along with international experience.

    edit:

    From Oliver Holt at the Mirror on Walcott: "Theo has told Capello he doesn't want to be considered for future squads while the Italian is in charge."
    What a baby! Almost as bad as GDS threating to quit the Mexico squad because his brother was dropped!
    Last edited by JackBuddy; 01-06-2010 at 05:19 PM.


    Image removed by Bolt660 (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have images in your signature which exceed the maximum limits for your usergroup.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,650
    Tokens
    3,460

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    "I am very disappointed not to be included in the squad going out to South Africa, but completely respect Mr Capello's decision," said Walcott.
    According to SSN.


  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    North England
    Posts
    5,718
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JackBuddy View Post
    All the other strikers are cleverer than him. Capello has picked two pacey players and two players who hold the ball up. England revolve around Rooney because he is one of the best in the world, Darren Bent isn't.

    I just don't think he is generally good enough and the other strikers do their jobs better. Darren Bent is fairly limited in how he plays, yes he scores goals, but he's not good enough imo. Defoe is probably only going to play when Rooney doesn't, he also has a tried and tested partnership with Crouch along with international experience.
    Cleverer? Proof. If you read what I said, I think Bent should replace Defoe, meaning 2 pace men and meaning Bent would play when Rooney isn't. And I'm saying the system doesn't have to change. Just play Bent when Rooney is rested. Urgh, what more do you want from a striker than scoring goals? Bent doesn't just score goals, he scores winning goals. Ask Arsene or Rafa. You would never, ever ask a defender to score more goals, so don't ask Bent to defend. It's foolish. Bent, off the bench playing off the last defender would murder teams.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Sunderland
    Posts
    5,027
    Tokens
    1,306

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Rediculous. The two times Bent has played for England while at Sunderland - both matches the support from the midfield was absolutely shocking.
    I'm sorry but what the **** does he expect? Is Bent just meant to magically pick the ball up in the defence, dribble up the whole pitch and score a goal all by himself?
    ******* disgraceful.
    Why did he get taken off during Japan? Rooney was absolutely dire, wasn't even trying.

    **** off you stupid Italian *****.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    6,050
    Tokens
    1,435

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I know the Sunderland contingent disagree but he hasn't got an all round game good enough in my eyes. There's a reason why he's been scoring 15+ goals consecutively over the past few seasons and not been picked up by a top team. Bent was called in too late, the other strikers are far more experienced. For Bent to score like he does for Sunderland the team would have to revolve around him, not sure it would work at international level.
    Last edited by JackBuddy; 01-06-2010 at 06:02 PM.


    Image removed by Bolt660 (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have images in your signature which exceed the maximum limits for your usergroup.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,650
    Tokens
    3,460

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I prefur Defoe over Bent.

    I hate Heskey. Heskey was never going to get dropped because apparently he's good for Rooney. Therefore Bent had to go.

    Guessing that's Capellos thoughts as well.


  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    North England
    Posts
    5,718
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I never understand "all round game." You say it like regularly scoring 15+ goals a season is a bad thing. He does what a striker has to. What he trains to do. If he had a creative midfielder behind him then it wouldn't be a problem. Besides, don't say it like only Sunderland want Bent in the squad. There are high profile names who were calling for it.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •