Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 81
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    3,594
    Tokens
    1,387
    Habbo
    Skizzling

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MattGarner View Post
    I know what *** means. We have said time and time again we don't want to let users swear on the forum as it makes the place look untidy and what not.
    Would be nice for a no filter option then.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,590
    Tokens
    33,601
    Habbo
    xxMATTGxx

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skizzling View Post
    Would be nice for a no filter option then.
    I'm not sure if that is even possible. If there's an add-on for it, then we won't be installing that I'm afraid.

    Reason behind it:

    People don't need to swear on the forum, it is unnecessary. If you want to make a point with something, then there is other words you can use. Although the way Habbo is using it is for a different context. It would also cause moderation issues which we don't want either.
    Last edited by xxMATTGxx; 25-06-2010 at 03:25 PM.


    Previous Habbox Roles
    Co-Owner of Habbox | General Manager | Assistant General Manager (Staff) | Forum Manager | Super Moderator | Forum Moderator

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    15,171
    Tokens
    1,267

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MattGarner View Post
    I know what *** means. We have said time and time again we don't want to let users swear on the forum as it makes the place look untidy and what not.
    How does *** look any different from wth? I understand perhaps **** as its the full word and can look untidy, but *** is hardly that. Also, if you wanna bring up the case of younger people learning swear words, if they know what the f is then they knew how to swear anyway.


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    3,594
    Tokens
    1,387
    Habbo
    Skizzling

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MattGarner View Post
    I'm not sure if that is even possible. If there's an add-on for it, then we won't be installing that I'm afraid.

    Reason behind it:

    People don't need to sear on the forum, it is unnecessary. If you want to make a point with something, then there is other words you can possible use. Although the way Habbo is using it, is for a different context. It would also cause moderation issues which we don't want either.
    w t f(riday)

    But yeah, I know people don't need to swear but there is no point of it being filtered as it isn't offensive, if they said 'what the f' then obviously they'll face the consequences. But I guess your main audience is kids so there you go.
    Last edited by Calvin; 25-06-2010 at 03:28 PM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,590
    Tokens
    33,601
    Habbo
    xxMATTGxx

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lNaughtynemo View Post
    How does *** look any different from wth? I understand perhaps **** as its the full word and can look untidy, but *** is hardly that. Also, if you wanna bring up the case of younger people learning swear words, if they know what the f is then they knew how to swear anyway.
    What the hell looks a lot better than ***. I wasn't even going to bring up the younger argument, I'm just saying there is not going be an on/off function for the filter.


    Previous Habbox Roles
    Co-Owner of Habbox | General Manager | Assistant General Manager (Staff) | Forum Manager | Super Moderator | Forum Moderator

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    15,171
    Tokens
    1,267

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MattGarner View Post
    What the hell looks a lot better than ***. I wasn't even going to bring up the younger argument, I'm just saying there is not going be an on/off function for the filter.
    Im not typing what the hell or what the **** though, we're talking about abbreviations here, and personally, i dont see the trouble between 2 letters. It can't even be used in an offensive way and if people are like YEH BUT I CAN SWEAR HERE WHY NOT THERE, just tell em to shut up if im honest. Oh and i dont mind having an on/off function, i dont really care massively about swearing, i just find it a bit silly (which kind of voids my post but yeh ^^, i guess i like to argue )


  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,392
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MattGarner View Post
    I know what *** means. We have said time and time again we don't want to let users swear on the forum as it makes the place look untidy and what not.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattGarner View Post
    I'm not sure if that is even possible. If there's an add-on for it, then we won't be installing that I'm afraid.

    Reason behind it:

    People don't need to swear on the forum, it is unnecessary. If you want to make a point with something, then there is other words you can use. Although the way Habbo is using it is for a different context. It would also cause moderation issues which we don't want either.
    Matt's pretty much summed up the arguments against taking these abbreviations out of the filter and turning off the filter would be a logistical nightmare.

    Whilst we allow filter avoidance in context, for example saurav avoided the W T F to post the thread in news & rumours - this is perfectly acceptable but it's not something we are going to permit forumwide and this decision will not change, sorry guys!
    "You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"

    RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
    Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.

    Retired from Habbox May 2011


  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    We only have them (re)filtered because Sammeth had kittens and power abused. He had 2 points against blocking them and a few of us had one which were all countered, but obviously his head was bigger than his brain so he went with our one point proven wrong against his two points proven wrong. Avoiding the filter vs. rudeness and swearing. They do avoid the filter (where I and a few others were wrong), but he and a few others were proven drastically wrong, because they are not swearing nor rude.

    Abbreviations are not a form of swearing, never have been, never will. When they were unfiltered they were perfectly fine, it was like reading Facebook or a normal forum where communcation is free (without appearing rude, and abbreviations are certainly NOT rude OR appearing as swear words, because they're not swearing). The only thing they do is border breaking the "avoiding the filter" rule, though avoiding the filter usually is with regards with whole words and not words that are abbreviations.

    My 2 cents.
    Last edited by GommeInc; 25-06-2010 at 03:56 PM.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Mank-Chest-Hair
    Posts
    4,039
    Tokens
    2,266

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    We only have them (re)filtered because Sammeth had kittens and power abused ... obviously his head was bigger than his brain so
    Couldn't agree more. I don't mind if its unfiltered really.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav View Post
    Couldn't agree more. I don't mind if its unfiltered really.
    It's how the "kids" speak nowadays. They're not intentionally being rude and they're certainly not swearing, and I bet they're not intentionally "avoiding the filter", seeing as it is common to speak like that. Surely we should be going by intentions, and not mindless systematic responses of " it R avoiding"?

Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •