Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


View Poll Results: What should David Cameron do concerning this proposed ruling?

Voters
27. You may not vote on this poll
  • David Cameron should refuse to accept the ruling and refuse to implement it.

    25 92.59%
  • David Cameron should back down to the EU and accept its decision.

    2 7.41%
Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 72
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    63,690
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I can't see this happening at all simply because according to this report "The rules will not allow both the weight and the quantity to be displayed", which would never be made the case. If they have to display weight on items then that's fine, but unless they also plan on taking off GDA% from packaging because it's not universal to everyone, or removing the suggested recipes sections on some boxes in case you don't like the other ingredients, this looks like a fairly normal idea that the Mail have blown out of proportion.
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  2. #12
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,023
    Tokens
    857
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    I can't see this happening at all simply because according to this report "The rules will not allow both the weight and the quantity to be displayed", which would never be made the case. If they have to display weight on items then that's fine, but unless they also plan on taking off GDA% from packaging because it's not universal to everyone, or removing the suggested recipes sections on some boxes in case you don't like the other ingredients, this looks like a fairly normal idea that the Mail have blown out of proportion.
    http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/bargain..._id=5&ito=1565

    It states on both this article and the Mail article (both look exact same) that the European Union has decided to end Britains deal which allowed it to sidetrack the metrification to a degree. I very much doubt that is made up, especially when members of the FSA (Financial Services Authority) and the Federation of Bakers have both commented on this story along with food industry experts.


  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,392
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Nothing's gonna change so it won't affect us really, it'll just say 737g on a pack of 6 eggs rather than 6 eggs, although it'll still be the same packet. Doesn't make much difference to me, I don't need a label saying "6 eggs" to know that there are 6 eggs in the packet.
    "You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"

    RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
    Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.

    Retired from Habbox May 2011


  4. #14
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,023
    Tokens
    857
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oli View Post
    Nothing's gonna change so it won't affect us really, it'll just say 737g on a pack of 6 eggs rather than 6 eggs, although it'll still be the same packet. Doesn't make much difference to me, I don't need a label saying "6 eggs" to know that there are 6 eggs in the packet.
    It;

    a) confuses consumers (older people in general).
    b) undermines the sovereignty of our country.
    c) undermines and weakens our imperial measurements system.
    d) linking in with c), it undermines our tradition and culture.
    e) could potentially cost the industry millions.
    f) potentially makes criminals out of people for using the British measurement system.

    I think all of them are something worth fighting for, especially b) - don't you?
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 27-06-2010 at 11:35 AM.


  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,587
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    It;

    a) confuses consumers (older people in general).
    b) undermines the sovereignty of our country.
    c) undermines and weakens our imperial measurements system.
    d) linking in with c), it undermines our tradition and culture.
    e) could potentially cost the industry millions.
    f) potentially makes criminals out of people for using the British measurement system.

    I think all of them are something worth fighting for, especially b) - don't you?

    Seriously get a grip, they are only putting the weight on the packet by the looks of it. You will find any small reason to discredit the EU and blow it out of proportion

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Middlesbrough, England
    Posts
    9,336
    Tokens
    10,837

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sex View Post
    Seriously get a grip, they are only putting the weight on the packet by the looks of it. You will find any small reason to discredit the EU and blow it out of proportion
    Agreed. I really doubt culture will change just because the EU adds some numbers onto a packet of eggs. We'll still use these terms and I think you're underestimating the intelligence of consumers (including the older people).

  7. #17
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,023
    Tokens
    857
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sex View Post
    Seriously get a grip, they are only putting the weight on the packet by the looks of it. You will find any small reason to discredit the EU and blow it out of proportion
    Quote Originally Posted by Inseriousity. View Post
    Agreed. I really doubt culture will change just because the EU adds some numbers onto a packet of eggs. We'll still use these terms and I think you're underestimating the intelligence of consumers (including the older people).
    You are both fine with having your country changed by unelected foreigners who do not have your countries best interests at heart?

    Its not about picking at it for the sake of it; its about sovereignty, democracy, potential costs, tradition and culture. The imperial weights and measurements systems were designed for practical usage over many years, the same way every culture across Europe has evolved its own language, regional dialects and way of life - once its gone its gone forever and the EU wants to create something called a 'European identity' of which doesnt exist.

    The whole European project was designed to be via the backdoor, hence why many people are oblivious to how much control it has over everything.

    How many people need to be unemployed for the EU elite to build their superstate? (Greece, Spain and various other countries being the examples)
    How many countries need to go under for the EU elite to build their superstate? (Greece so far, potentially Ireland/Italy/Portugal & Spain)
    How many africans need to starve in order for the EU elite to build their superstate? (EU dumping trade on African markets)
    How many people need to abtain criminal records for using a British measurement system?

    If you are fine with all of this then I would ask what was the point in our ancestors fighting various wars across the world, only for the young to throw it away. If you can answer all of these, then come back to me and call them small reasons again when you've both thought them over.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 27-06-2010 at 04:53 PM.


  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    scotland
    Posts
    4,475
    Tokens
    135

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sex View Post
    Seriously get a grip, they are only putting the weight on the packet by the looks of it. You will find any small reason to discredit the EU and blow it out of proportion
    He's completely right though. It's not so much the fact that it's unnecessary or that it's being changed from the number of eggs to a weight, it's more to do with the fact that no-one wants it and the whole idea has not came from the British government, it's came from the EU. It's a bloody sad situation when your country has no control over the changing and implementation of new, irrelevant laws.
    Last edited by Caution; 27-06-2010 at 05:31 PM.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrPinkPanther View Post
    No one is stopping anyone selling eggs by the dozen, they will continue to do so like they always have. What is ACTUALLY is is it's sensible legislation to ensure that all Eggs are roughly the weights that they say they are ensuring a fairer price for the end consumer. I mean we all see "large eggs" on the box but what actually constitutes large? This legislation is simply used to monitor that companies are putting in the box what they say they are preventing consumers from being "ripped off".
    When did common sense die :S No-one cooks or consumes eggs through weight, they consume eggs by size. Cooking instructions for eggs go by size "1 medium egg/1 large egg" etc. Using weight is unnecessary when the size of an egg stands in line with other companies :/

    It makes little sense adding weight to a packet of eggs, when no-one cares or uses eggs by their weight, seeing as what you see is what you get when it comes to eggs :/
    Last edited by GommeInc; 27-06-2010 at 11:53 PM.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,590
    Tokens
    33,601
    Habbo
    xxMATTGxx

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I think this is useless to be honest. I don't see the point why we need to start adding weight to things when we have used the current system for like years and years. :S


    Previous Habbox Roles
    Co-Owner of Habbox | General Manager | Assistant General Manager (Staff) | Forum Manager | Super Moderator | Forum Moderator

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •