
Considering on recent threads/posts made by that user, you have to wonder whether it was him who posted in the first place!
I am not referring specifically to your situation, just why it is against the rules in the first place.
Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini
Well that isn't my problem reallyHis account made the posts therefore I assumed it was him
The issue is only whether or not you had permission to post the image. If he pm'd Oli saying you had permission then most likely it would be reversed. Josh the rule has always been the same since we were allowed to post pictures.
I understand that posting a image directly onto the forum is against the rules if done so without permission. What I didn't understand is the posting a link to another publicly viewable thread on another forum was classed as posting a picture of another member - this wasn't in the rules. I then suggested it should be added and it has been.![]()
It was always in the rules, Josh - you asked for it to be made clearer that it was against the rules. Nothing has been added or taken away.I understand that posting a image directly onto the forum is against the rules if done so without permission. What I didn't understand is the posting a link to another publicly viewable thread on another forum was classed as posting a picture of another member - this wasn't in the rules. I then suggested it should be added and it has been.
"You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"
RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.
Retired from Habbox May 2011
I actually think it was but last time they trimmed them down a lot of this detail went which was a bit unfortunate.I understand that posting a image directly onto the forum is against the rules if done so without permission. What I didn't understand is the posting a link to another publicly viewable thread on another forum was classed as posting a picture of another member - this wasn't in the rules. I then suggested it should be added and it has been.
This is correct Rosie, we thought that it would be obvious that linking to a page which contains an image would be the same rule which forbids people from posting images without permission, perhaps not - it has been clarified now anyway.
"You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"
RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.
Retired from Habbox May 2011
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!