-rep suggestion

[myke]

It's extra work for Jamesy that's not of any gain, the +(however many of reps the post has) works, what's the point in adding something that shows if a post that has been +repped has been -repped too, when that almost never happens involving legitimate reputation. Completely pointless idea, Sorry Dave.

it must happen if someone finds someones insult funny they will +rep ... if someone else finds it bad they will -rep...

i've seen that happen plenty of times.

[Lost_Addict]

it must happen if someone finds someones insult funny they will +rep ... if someone else finds it bad they will -rep...

i've seen that happen plenty of times.

People dont +/- rep enough anyway to + or - rep for an insult, and thats pretty much fact.

[Hecktix]

it must happen if someone finds someones insult funny they will +rep ... if someone else finds it bad they will -rep...

i've seen that happen plenty of times.

Posts that break rules shouldn't recieve reputation, that's not to say they don't mind.

[myke]

People dont +/- rep enough anyway to + or - rep for an insult, and thats pretty much fact.

Do you have anything to say that's a fact? I've seen plenty of times

'so true ... +REP' to a post that's rule breaking or '-rep that's harsh...' just because people don't post to say they are giving out reputation, doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

[Hecktix]

Do you have anything to say that's a fact? I've seen plenty of times

'so true ... +REP' to a post that's rule breaking or '-rep that's harsh...' just because people don't post to say they are giving out reputation, doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

To be honest Myke, a lot of the time you see someone say "+rep" or "-rep" they rarely actually do it. On top of that I do have the evidence of what +rep and -rep gets given out, nowadays +rep is only really given if someone helps someone or on the rare occasion someone finds something funny (this is becoming increasingly rare, which is something I wish to target) and unfortunately nowadays the majority of -rep given out is unfair, given out of spite but technically fair (i.e. if someone pisses someone off) and occasionally for rule breaking.

Rep isn't given out like it used to be and things need to change to make it given out like it is, the feature showing how many times a post has been +repped is good and informative, but to suggest this should change if the post gets -repped is pointless, as who reads the same post twice apart from the OP?

[Lost_Addict]

When you go on your rep page it displays 15 reputations on that page ive got a reputation from the 27th August 2009. This means i havn't recieved 15 reps good or bad in almost a year.

I post alot around this forum be it helpful or not, but this has to indicate reputation isn't used as frequently as it should.

[Nemo]

When you go on your rep page it displays 15 reputations on that page ive got a reputation from the 27th August 2009. This means i havn't recieved 15 reps good or bad in almost a year.

I post alot around this forum be it helpful or not, but this has to indicate reputation isn't used as frequently as it should.

Cant really base it on yourself, since the bottom of my rep thing is from a week ago, so ive gotten 15 reps in a weekf, and not one of those is spam.

[Hecktix]

Cant really base it on yourself, since the bottom of my rep thing is from a week ago, so ive gotten 15 reps in a weekf, and not one of those is spam.

Well, I can see everybody's reputation, and I can tell you it's definitely an underused feature on the whole

[Lost_Addict]

I'm averaging this year, just over one reputation +/- a month, and this year i've been more active than last year.

The rep system is slowly dying out.

[Nemo]

Well, I can see everybody's reputation, and I can tell you it's definitely an underused feature on the whole

oh. Fair enough then if you can see everyones, but only gettin 15 reps in a year is really below average i'd think.