My opinion on Hxl Since 2006

[Glopy]

no need for all this discussion

hxl used to be good. it's now crap. like liverpool. only senior management at liverpool realised they needed a new manager to improve

is that a hint at all?

[AgnesIO]

It did make me laugh when you said about the kids and bedtimes - +rep for making me laugh.

I do agree that some dj's do lack in quality, but at the same time I think the age usergroup on habbo has dropped massively so the quality will drop too. I know people won't admit it, but people who are 10-13 are going to be much more boring to listen to than someone older - but then again SOME young people can be good.

I think a major problem is HxL (I know they always have been) applications are very writing based - perhaps it would be better if they were made to be you record a 15 minute show of yourself (with no mpre than 5 minutes song). Although I guess the problem there would be time. Perhaps if all senior djs listened to some to, then a public shortlist could be made?? With no names of who it is obviously.

Just a thought - although it probably wouldn't work!

[Glopy]

I think before a Dj is even trialed, they must have experiences from a offical or well known site, such as habbohut, hffm. clubhabbo.

[Nixt]

Yes but then you are severely limiting the amount of people available to hire - if we were to only take people with experience from big fansites, you are basically making it very difficult if not impossible in some circumstances to hire anyone at all.

[sammy]

I think before a Dj is even trialed, they must have experiences from a offical or well known site, such as habbohut, hffm. clubhabbo.

Don't agree at all. Lots of good DJs didn't have any experience before HabboxLive, neither did I. DJing comes naturally to some unexperienced people so making that rule would be ridiculous in my opinion .

[Glopy]

i said ecleast a good site, hiring someone from a rubbish site just proves habbox is going down hill, listing to the trailist yesterday was hard to sit threw.

[Nixt]

If you have a problem with any member of staff and their ability to carry out their role please contact their department manager and / or myself who will deal with it appropriately. Hiring people with experience from *good sites* means that we severely limit the amount of people who apply and who we can hire, essentially reducing the overall quality of HabboxLive as a number of excellent DJs join HxL with absolutely no experience at all. Whilst experience is desirable, if we were to ignore high quality applications simply because they had no experience, we would be doing little but inhibiting HxL rather than improving it.

[Glopy]

its the way the world works garion. you dont get a big money fat cat buying the cheapest of the cheap to impress. if you wanna be big spend big,

[Nixt]

This isn't the world, this is Habbo. Unfortunately the amount of DJs with experience from major sites who are excellent DJs of a quality beyond anything we could hope for are in rather short supply. We do try to give our listeners the best we can, but our staff are volunteers who give up their own time for no form of payment and therefore professional DJs are, as I say, in short supply. What we need to do is find those with potential and train them up to become the best possible DJs - limiting HabboxLive to those with all this experience you are suggesting results in 0 applications and ultimately, very few DJs. It simply wouldn't work.

Of course when you say hire DJs with experience from sites such as HFFM and CH, I could just refer to listener numbers:

HxL - 69 (oh my! )
CH - 30
HFFM - 29

So in fact, one could say that it makes very little sense to bring DJs in solely from fansites that are in fact, not succeeding as well as our own?

At the end of the day, we will choose the DJs we think are best for the job. We will endeavour to ensure they reach a high standard and if they don't, they will be removed.

[Glopy]

This isn't the world, this is Habbo. Unfortunately the amount of DJs with experience from major sites who are excellent DJs of a quality beyond anything we could hope for are in rather short supply. We do try to give our listeners the best we can, but our staff are volunteers who give up their own time for no form of payment and therefore professional DJs are, as I say, in short supply. What we need to do is find those with potential and train them up to become the best possible DJs - limiting HabboxLive to those with all this experience you are suggesting results in 0 applications and ultimately, very few DJs. It simply wouldn't work.

Of course when you say hire DJs with experience from sites such as HFFM and CH, I could just refer to listener numbers:

HxL - 69 (oh my! )
CH - 30
HFFM - 29

So in fact, one could say that it makes very little sense to bring DJs in solely from fansites that are in fact, not succeeding as well as our own?

At the end of the day, we will choose the DJs we think are best for the job. We will endeavour to ensure they reach a high standard and if they don't, they will be removed.

Habbo's changed for the worst.