The forum review

[Con]

I think these changes have come at the right time. There has been a lot of moaning/criticism lately of Habbox and it's sites. So, these reviews are perfect.
I love the changes made and I'm sure the rest to come will be great too.

Maybe he was a good moderator but he was being restricted by the section he had and never got a chance to show his full potential.

Sorry, I'm quoting you but I've seen other people say this. If a moderator feels like they do not have enough to moderate then they could have requested another forum to moderate. I did that in my trial after realising Graphics, having only 3 forums, didn't really need a huge amount of moderating so I requested another section to mod.
It is a shame he left, but as said the method of choosing the remaining moderators was fair and we all agreed on the terms and consequences given.

[N!ck]

I like the changes, however I do not think 3 Global moderators is enough. 5 would probably be better.

[Matthew]

I like the changes, however I do not think 3 Global moderators is enough. 5 would probably be better.

I think that 3 is perfect.
We now have 6 moderators, all of whom can moderate the whole forum; its plenty.
Yes you need more when 75% of the mods can only moderate in one forum, but we can all moderate in every forum, so it works well

[MissAlice]

Definitely a step in the right direction, and only time will tell whether the number of staff is right or wrong. Well done to who ever suggested the changes. It's a real positive one

[Panda]

i like this forum a lot more than the immigration hot spot. bravo

[N!ck]

I think that 3 is perfect.
We now have 6 moderators, all of whom can moderate the whole forum; its plenty.
Yes you need more when 75% of the mods can only moderate in one forum, but we can all moderate in every forum, so it works well

Yes, however it is natural that certain mods prefer/are more active in a particular area of the forum. I think you need more to make sure all areas are properly covered. Maybe have some kind of poll in the moderator forum the see which areas people are actually active in?

[samsaBEAR]

Yes, however it is natural that certain mods prefer/are more active in a particular area of the forum. I think you need more to make sure all areas are properly covered. Maybe have some kind of poll in the moderator forum the see which areas people are actually active in?

Agreed with this, six moderators is no where near enough to cover the whole forum. I can understand the idea around having global mods, and I definitely think it's a good idea, but six just doesn't seem enough to me.

[Jsoh]

liking the idea, not sure if this leaves much difference between a super moderator and just a normal moderator, though.

[immense]

well last stats showed 800-2k posts a day

5% break rules = 40-100 rule breaking posts i think 6 is about right

obviously the 5% of posts that break rules is just a guess

[Grig]

I say remove super mods now and just have 6 global mods, as the jobs are so similar it may be no point- the global mods can cover the one or two things that smods do. Just means you got to vet new staff more thoroughly.