Habbox Forum Ban Review

[Richie]

alright lol


it doesn't really bother me cos im not banned but whether someone was banned 2 years ago or a few months ago wouldn't really make a difference. People can 'grow up' or change in a matter of days. If certain people are getting their ban reviewed then everyone banned deserves to as well. You shouldn't group ppl off by dates.

[Hecktix]

alright lol


it doesn't really bother me cos im not banned but whether someone was banned 2 years ago or a few months ago wouldn't really make a difference. People can 'grow up' or change in a matter of days. Everyone banned deserves a second chance by getting there ban reviewed.

Anybody can grow up yes, however if they broke rules and deserved to be perm'd then that's that - which is why we are only reversing unfair bans or bans which have no evidence.

[AgnesIO]

alright lol


it doesn't really bother me cos im not banned but whether someone was banned 2 years ago or a few months ago wouldn't really make a difference. People can 'grow up' or change in a matter of days. Everyone banned deserves a second chance by getting there ban reviewed.

I do agree with some of this.

My first posts on hxf always bring a smile to my face. Infact my two first -reps told me to get a new habbo name, and that 'you are the biggest noob ever'. Infact I twist it there, my first two reps were those, not the first -reps.

Now though, I rarely get a -rep.

[Richie]

Anybody can grow up yes, however if they broke rules and deserved to be perm'd then that's that - which is why we are only reversing unfair bans or bans which have no evidence.

That's fair enough but whats to say bans from a few months ago were 'unfair' or had no 'evidence'?

Oh wait, the management who hand out bans now are fine. So their work (basically) won't be reviewed. That's not fair at all.

[Hecktix]

That's fair enough but whats to say bans from a few months ago were 'unfair' or had no 'evidence'?

I could guaruntee no bans issued within the last few months have no evidence since we are so stringent on policy nowadays, the reason there's no need to look at recent bans is because they have probably already been appealed - if not they can appeal as normal.

[Richie]

I could guaruntee no bans issued within the last few months have no evidence since we are so stringent on policy nowadays, the reason there's no need to look at recent bans is because they have probably already been appealed - if not they can appeal as normal.

A space of 18months is a long time though and I'm sure old banned users have appealed bans too.

[Callum.]

I'll get on the phone to Pleke and Greco.

[AgnesIO]

I'll get on the phone to Pleke and Greco.

+Repped you.

Made me laugh - shame I don't think there's would go down as unfair :L

[Hecktix]

+Repped you.

Made me laugh - shame I don't think there's would go down as unfair :L

Unfortunate really, Pleke is a Habbox Forum legend!

[Nemo]

I could guaruntee no bans issued within the last few months have no evidence since we are so stringent on policy nowadays, the reason there's no need to look at recent bans is because they have probably already been appealed - if not they can appeal as normal.

I havent really read this thread nor do i intend to. But on behalf of titch:

So i assume you will be re-banning yourself then, because you perm was fair, you acted like a e-rebel and deserved your ban, so why should it be diffrent for others?