Lucas is a better player than Kuyt imo...better all round and he's younger & could still improve. Shame we sold Babel, we need to give Ngog more of a run, when he's played, he's played well.
DJ Robbie
Former Jobs: Events Organiser, News Reporter, HxHD
Some of these posts are a joke, and is why this section is awful nowadays.
So your comeback for Stefan is: They're better then wolves? Yes Liverpool are better then Wolves, what's your point. What an immature reply.
Anyway, Liverpool have poor width. Someone just said Miereles is a great winger, and so is Johnson? You know nothing about your players if you think that. Miereles isn't a winger, far from it.
Liverpool have barely any natural width. Bendtner plays on the wing for us nowadays in most games, doesn't mean he's a good winger does it? Kuyt is average as a winger, so is Jovanovic who is actually poor so far. Cole isn't a natural winger anymore, he prefurs to play centrally. Maxi is a natural winger in a way, but nobody else in your squad is and it isn't even a debatable point, it's fact.
Nobody asked about Arsenal?Liverpool have barely any natural width. Bendtner plays on the wing for us nowadays in most games, doesn't mean he's a good winger does it? Kuyt is average as a winger, so is Jovanovic who is actually poor so far. Cole isn't a natural winger anymore, he prefurs to play centrally. Maxi is a natural winger in a way, but nobody else in your squad is and it isn't even a debatable point, it's fact.
The thread said 'Liverpool no width.' We've named people who play on the wings and can go on from there, also named people who have played there so i don't see your problem.
Just to add in a previous post you said 'Liverpool would be a good team if we had a DM and a LB' make your mind up.
Last edited by .Shaun,,; 04-02-2011 at 10:24 PM.
Outside the Shankly Gates
I heard a Kopite calling
Shankly, they have taken you away
But you left the great eleven
Just before you went to heaven
The Redmen are still playing the same way.
You'll Never Walk Alone.
It's a comparison. Bloody hell, what happened to the days where you didn't have to explain every single post you made and could assume that posters actually didn't post rubbish replies.Nobody asked about Arsenal?
The thread said 'Liverpool no width.' We've named people who play on the wings and can go on from there, also named people who have played there so i don't see your problem.
Just to add in a previous post you said 'Liverpool would be a good team if we had a DM and a LB' make your mind up.
You've named players who can play on the wing yes, but you've not named natural wingers, which you only have 1 of. The thread was made to say that Liverpool have no natural wingers, not that Liverpool have no make-shift wingers who can play there. Heck, you can stick a DM as a CB and he can do an ok job, doesn't make him a CB does it?
And yes, you need a LB and a DM first imo in your first team, and a backup winger or two would also be very useful but you're not made of money. I thought every Liverpool fan knew you needed a LB first, or again am I assuming that you thought before you posted?
Yeah I know we do. What I was saying was one min your saying we've got nothing then in the post before we only need 2 more players to be a good team, so your contradicting your self.
Outside the Shankly Gates
I heard a Kopite calling
Shankly, they have taken you away
But you left the great eleven
Just before you went to heaven
The Redmen are still playing the same way.
You'll Never Walk Alone.
I was talking about your first XI, If J. Cole finds form again, then there will be no need for a starting winger as there would be no room, but you do need backup wingers who are natural ones. If Cole doesn't find form, then another winger who can start would be very useful. I know Cole isn't a natural winger, but there's no need spending money on a winger atm when you desperately need a LB. But it still doesn't change the fact that you have barely any natural width.
Liverpool are better than Wolves.Some of these posts are a joke, and is why this section is awful nowadays.
So your comeback for Stefan is: They're better then wolves? Yes Liverpool are better then Wolves, what's your point. What an immature reply.
Anyway, Liverpool have poor width. Someone just said Miereles is a great winger, and so is Johnson? You know nothing about your players if you think that. Miereles isn't a winger, far from it.
Liverpool have barely any natural width. Bendtner plays on the wing for us nowadays in most games, doesn't mean he's a good winger does it? Kuyt is average as a winger, so is Jovanovic who is actually poor so far. Cole isn't a natural winger anymore, he prefurs to play centrally. Maxi is a natural winger in a way, but nobody else in your squad is and it isn't even a debatable point, it's fact.
Liverpool have no width but Wolves do, what's the point of this thread? You obviously don't need width to do well
Last edited by mynameiswootzeh; 05-02-2011 at 12:06 AM.
So you think Liverpool are doing well then for a club of there stature? Again, think before you post. Wolves have width yes, but they also don't have world class players, they don't even have top class players. They also aren't expected to finish high, they're expected so survive.
How about comparing Liverpool to similar stature teams.
United - Valencia and Nani
Arsenal - Arshavin, Walcott, Nasri
Chelsea - Malouda and Anelka in a way
Spurs - Lennon, Bale
City - Johnson, Silva
Liverpool, Maxi... that's it and he's not even great.
Last edited by CHA!NGANG; 05-02-2011 at 12:12 AM.
They're surviving, and pushing for a place in Europe thats enough for them this season, without any width.So you think Liverpool are doing well then for a club of there stature? Again, think before you post. Wolves have width yes, but they also don't have world class players, they don't even have top class players. They also aren't expected to finish high, they're expected so survive.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!