Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 57
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    4,611
    Tokens
    0
    Habbo
    Conservative,

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by .Shaun,, View Post
    I don't really like Lucas he annoys me sometimes :/ I like Kuyt especially when he's up for the game hopefully ready for Sunday! Yeah we sold Babel which was disappointing he was a good player left wing and a striker, liking Ngog to tho!
    Lucas is a better player than Kuyt imo...better all round and he's younger & could still improve. Shame we sold Babel, we need to give Ngog more of a run, when he's played, he's played well.

    DJ Robbie
    Former Jobs: Events Organiser, News Reporter, HxHD



  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,650
    Tokens
    3,460

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Some of these posts are a joke, and is why this section is awful nowadays.

    So your comeback for Stefan is: They're better then wolves? Yes Liverpool are better then Wolves, what's your point. What an immature reply.

    Anyway, Liverpool have poor width. Someone just said Miereles is a great winger, and so is Johnson? You know nothing about your players if you think that. Miereles isn't a winger, far from it.

    Liverpool have barely any natural width. Bendtner plays on the wing for us nowadays in most games, doesn't mean he's a good winger does it? Kuyt is average as a winger, so is Jovanovic who is actually poor so far. Cole isn't a natural winger anymore, he prefurs to play centrally. Maxi is a natural winger in a way, but nobody else in your squad is and it isn't even a debatable point, it's fact.


  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    667
    Tokens
    751

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CHA!NGANG View Post
    Liverpool have barely any natural width. Bendtner plays on the wing for us nowadays in most games, doesn't mean he's a good winger does it? Kuyt is average as a winger, so is Jovanovic who is actually poor so far. Cole isn't a natural winger anymore, he prefurs to play centrally. Maxi is a natural winger in a way, but nobody else in your squad is and it isn't even a debatable point, it's fact.
    Nobody asked about Arsenal?

    The thread said 'Liverpool no width.' We've named people who play on the wings and can go on from there, also named people who have played there so i don't see your problem.

    Just to add in a previous post you said 'Liverpool would be a good team if we had a DM and a LB' make your mind up.
    Last edited by .Shaun,,; 04-02-2011 at 10:24 PM.

    Outside the Shankly Gates
    I heard a Kopite calling
    Shankly, they have taken you away
    But you left the great eleven
    Just before you went to heaven
    The Redmen are still playing the same way
    .

    You'll Never Walk Alone.


  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,650
    Tokens
    3,460

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by .Shaun,, View Post
    Nobody asked about Arsenal?

    The thread said 'Liverpool no width.' We've named people who play on the wings and can go on from there, also named people who have played there so i don't see your problem.

    Just to add in a previous post you said 'Liverpool would be a good team if we had a DM and a LB' make your mind up.
    It's a comparison. Bloody hell, what happened to the days where you didn't have to explain every single post you made and could assume that posters actually didn't post rubbish replies.

    You've named players who can play on the wing yes, but you've not named natural wingers, which you only have 1 of. The thread was made to say that Liverpool have no natural wingers, not that Liverpool have no make-shift wingers who can play there. Heck, you can stick a DM as a CB and he can do an ok job, doesn't make him a CB does it?

    And yes, you need a LB and a DM first imo in your first team, and a backup winger or two would also be very useful but you're not made of money. I thought every Liverpool fan knew you needed a LB first, or again am I assuming that you thought before you posted?


  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    667
    Tokens
    751

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CHA!NGANG View Post
    And yes, you need a LB and a DM first imo in your first team, and a backup winger or two would also be very useful but you're not made of money. I thought every Liverpool fan knew you needed a LB first, or again am I assuming that you thought before you posted?
    Yeah I know we do. What I was saying was one min your saying we've got nothing then in the post before we only need 2 more players to be a good team, so your contradicting your self.

    Outside the Shankly Gates
    I heard a Kopite calling
    Shankly, they have taken you away
    But you left the great eleven
    Just before you went to heaven
    The Redmen are still playing the same way
    .

    You'll Never Walk Alone.


  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,650
    Tokens
    3,460

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by .Shaun,, View Post
    Yeah I know we do. What I was saying was one min your saying we've got nothing then in the post before we only need 2 more players to be a good team, so your contradicting your self.
    I was talking about your first XI, If J. Cole finds form again, then there will be no need for a starting winger as there would be no room, but you do need backup wingers who are natural ones. If Cole doesn't find form, then another winger who can start would be very useful. I know Cole isn't a natural winger, but there's no need spending money on a winger atm when you desperately need a LB. But it still doesn't change the fact that you have barely any natural width.


  7. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CHA!NGANG View Post
    Some of these posts are a joke, and is why this section is awful nowadays.

    So your comeback for Stefan is: They're better then wolves? Yes Liverpool are better then Wolves, what's your point. What an immature reply.

    Anyway, Liverpool have poor width. Someone just said Miereles is a great winger, and so is Johnson? You know nothing about your players if you think that. Miereles isn't a winger, far from it.

    Liverpool have barely any natural width. Bendtner plays on the wing for us nowadays in most games, doesn't mean he's a good winger does it? Kuyt is average as a winger, so is Jovanovic who is actually poor so far. Cole isn't a natural winger anymore, he prefurs to play centrally. Maxi is a natural winger in a way, but nobody else in your squad is and it isn't even a debatable point, it's fact.
    Liverpool are better than Wolves.
    Liverpool have no width but Wolves do, what's the point of this thread? You obviously don't need width to do well
    Last edited by mynameiswootzeh; 05-02-2011 at 12:06 AM.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,650
    Tokens
    3,460

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mynameiswootzeh View Post
    Liverpool are better than Wolves.
    Liverpool have no width but Wolves do, what's the point of this thread? You obviously don't need width to do well
    So you think Liverpool are doing well then for a club of there stature? Again, think before you post. Wolves have width yes, but they also don't have world class players, they don't even have top class players. They also aren't expected to finish high, they're expected so survive.

    How about comparing Liverpool to similar stature teams.

    United - Valencia and Nani
    Arsenal - Arshavin, Walcott, Nasri
    Chelsea - Malouda and Anelka in a way
    Spurs - Lennon, Bale
    City - Johnson, Silva
    Liverpool, Maxi... that's it and he's not even great.
    Last edited by CHA!NGANG; 05-02-2011 at 12:12 AM.


  9. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CHA!NGANG View Post
    So you think Liverpool are doing well then for a club of there stature? Again, think before you post. Wolves have width yes, but they also don't have world class players, they don't even have top class players. They also aren't expected to finish high, they're expected so survive.
    They're surviving, and pushing for a place in Europe thats enough for them this season, without any width.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,650
    Tokens
    3,460

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mynameiswootzeh View Post
    They're surviving, and pushing for a place in Europe thats enough for them this season, without any width.
    Pushing for a place in the Europa League? If Liverpool fans are content with that then they have low standards.


Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •