
They should have these legal cases without stopping the consumers from receiving stock. It damages businesses small and big. If the retail stores don't get their stock then it automatically damages their sales. LG are just looking for money, if the ps3 continued to undersell like it did in 2007 then they probably wouldn't even bother sueing. To me it looks like LG deliberately waited until ps3 was at its peak before creating a fuss.
If they were really concerned about their patent then for a massive release like the ps3 they should take up court cases before it's even released in my opinion.
Imo, I think LG has been looking for reasons to take Sony to court since Sony took LG to court lol.They should have these legal cases without stopping the consumers from receiving stock. It damages businesses small and big. If the retail stores don't get their stock then it automatically damages their sales. LG are just looking for money, if the ps3 continued to undersell like it did in 2007 then they probably wouldn't even bother sueing. To me it looks like LG deliberately waited until ps3 was at its peak before creating a fuss.
If they were really concerned about their patent then for a massive release like the ps3 they should take up court cases before it's even released in my opinion.
How would that work? LG don't get prerelease models of other company's products, that wouldn't be good business practice at all.They should have these legal cases without stopping the consumers from receiving stock. It damages businesses small and big. If the retail stores don't get their stock then it automatically damages their sales. LG are just looking for money, if the ps3 continued to undersell like it did in 2007 then they probably wouldn't even bother sueing. To me it looks like LG deliberately waited until ps3 was at its peak before creating a fuss.
If they were really concerned about their patent then for a massive release like the ps3 they should take up court cases before it's even released in my opinion.
IMO It's Sony's fault businesses will be affected, it's Sony's product and they should be the ones paying up seeing as they're in the wrong.
Wasn't Sony one of the creators of Blu-ray.. so if it wasn't for Sony, then LG wouldn't even be able to make a Blu-ray player.
I can see Sony getting them back ^_^
i say what goes around come around. If Sony want to winge about hackers and screw many people by saying they never owned the PS3, Then they can get fined/sued or whatever.
Sorry but this is pathetic, Sony are a big company and for LG to do this they are going to lose a lot of custom in Europe due to there selfishness.
Outside the Shankly Gates
I heard a Kopite calling
Shankly, they have taken you away
But you left the great eleven
Just before you went to heaven
The Redmen are still playing the same way.
You'll Never Walk Alone.
Don't think you understand what I mean.
Since Sony were one of the main developers of actual Blu-Ray, then LG wouldn't be able to create Blu-Ray players (since the technology wouldn't exist). So Sony creating Blu-Ray has helped LG make money by selling Blu-Ray players?
That's not exactly the same tho haha
This is what happens when Sony tried to block LG mobile phones from entering the United States. So really LG are just fighting back and playing Sony's game really, Sony shouldn't of done whatever if they are actually in the wrong.
Last edited by xxMATTGxx; 02-03-2011 at 04:43 PM.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!