Don't even want to watch the trailer. I watched the first one, so messed up and disturbing. I won't be watching this one!

Don't even want to watch the trailer. I watched the first one, so messed up and disturbing. I won't be watching this one!
When the first one was shown on syfy were bits cut out of it? Because I really didn't think it was that disgusting. Only saw him cut someones skin abit and a little bit of puss from an infected wound? the rest wasn'tt even badddd
If it wasn't cut then I hope the next one has more disgustingty to it
Last edited by Stephen; 09-03-2011 at 03:25 AM.
Thats very *Removed* up......
Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator):
Please do not avoid the filter
Last edited by Catzsy; 09-03-2011 at 09:40 AM.
Lexi
It's more disturbing in principle than anything you actually see.When the first one was shown on syfy were bits cut out of it? Because I really didn't think it was that disgusting. Only saw him cut someones skin abit and a little bit of puss from an infected wound? the rest wasn'tt even badddd
If it wasn't cut then I hope the next one has more disgustingty to it
The first one isn't really gruesome, it's more what it suggests really.
I got warned for talking about the first movie in spam a while back, actualy alls i did was mention the name i believe.
Bonjour, la noirceur, mon vieil ami
Je suis venu te reparler
Car une vision piétinante doucement
A laissé ses graines lorsque je dormais
Et la vision
Qui était plantée dans mon cerveau
Demeure toujours
Parmi le son du silence
I don't really see the point in this film. And also why did it say inaccurate at the end....?
Because it's... 100% medically inaccurate unlike the first, which was billed as 100% medically accurate.
it just sounds like more being twisted for the sake of it. yawwwwn
you can be my daddy
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!