when you +rep someone it comes up with a +1 in green, but when you -rep someone it doesn't come up with a -1 in red?
Put it this way, wouldn't you hate it if everyone could see that your post has about 5 -reps?Some people can also be easily influenced by others -repping posts too.
I think it's also nicer to see more positive things around the forum rather than the negativity.
Because "they dont want that kind of negativity on the forum"
I do think it should take away from the green +'s though, but not go below 0
You'd be surprised at the first one Ben. I was Forum Manager when this little feature was introduced and the reason I didn't want -rep's included was purely because it is promoting negativity, -rep is private for a reason and showing the negativity between users could promote further negativity and lead to arguments/users being bullied.
I've found the +rep appearing as a good feature, especially in feedback as it enables you to see further into who supports certain ideas etc.
"You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"
RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.
Retired from Habbox May 2011
With nothing happening to the counter with -reps there can be (and have often been) cases where a post is not at all well received by most but 1 or 2 people +repping them makes it look like a popular opinion. If -reps don't have their own counter (which there really ought to be as it's still a genuine indicator of what sort of attitudes/ideas aren't accepted here) they should at least have an effect on how many +reps a post is shown to have
I think that showing -reps would be a good feature in feedback.![]()
Last edited by rnix; 28-03-2011 at 11:41 PM.
forever the queen.
My argument has always been if they can see +rep they should be able to see -rep so it's equal. It's a shame there is nothing really any more that can decrease rep points because lets be honest the -rep feature is a total fail. It's pointless to use because it's too easy to get removed.
Could someone actually give me some examples of what is a legit -rep?
ofwgktadgaf
My argument has always been if they can see +rep they should be able to see -rep so it's equal. It's a shame there is nothing really any more that can decrease rep points because lets be honest the -rep feature is a total fail. It's pointless to use because it's too easy to get removed.
Could someone actually give me some examples of what is a legit -rep?
Well in my eyes a pointless rep is where it seems to not relate to the post.
Example: Someone posts a thread in spam and i say a joke about the subject. (Baring in mind it is in spam and could of been in a more controlled section) I get a -rep because i'm being offensive.
In my eyes it should be removed because of the forum it is posted in and the content of the post.
Above was a example i was not dicussing reps![]()
forever the queen.
To be fair though even if it's on topic it normally always gets removed. I have never had a problem with getting rep removed in the past. I just leave it there no as I sort of view rep as "a game" you go up the ladder but demons shoot you back down.Well in my eyes a pointless rep is where it seems to not relate to the post.
Example: Someone posts a thread in spam and i say a joke about the subject. (Baring in mind it is in spam and could of been in a more controlled section) I get a -rep because i'm being offensive.
In my eyes it should be removed because of the forum it is posted in and the content of the post.
Above was a example i was not dicussing reps
ofwgktadgaf
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!