Would you pay $2,668 For Headphones?

[Agnostic Bear]

Heh, to all that said they would, enjoy your complete waste of money, mediocre sound at an outrageous price tag. In-ear headphones will never produce good enough sound for hardcore listening.

[AgnesIO]

Heh, to all that said they would, enjoy your complete waste of money, mediocre sound at an outrageous price tag. In-ear headphones will never produce good enough sound for hardcore listening.

If you had £50b you could just frame them..

[Triz]

If you had £50b you could just frame them..

If you had $2,668 you could frame them too

[Ellz]

that is ridiculous, mine cost a fiver from ASDA

[AgnesIO]

If you had $2,668 you could frame them too

That would effect your money though.

I was just pointing out with large amounts of moeny (heck even a fair few million) it wouldn't effect you at all

[Stephen]

what if they broke lol would be well gutted

HI ID JUS LIKE TO INSURE MY EARPHONES

[Moh]

They look hideous!

If I was a millionaire/billionaire and I had money to waste, I would buy them if they looked better lol.

[GommeInc]

Heh, to all that said they would, enjoy your complete waste of money, mediocre sound at an outrageous price tag. In-ear headphones will never produce good enough sound for hardcore listening.

I've never got the point of in-ear headphones, they don't really do a good enough job and are pretty rank to wear, with the wax that inevitably comes out. I only wear the ones that sit just inside the ear. Obviously the ones usually associated with DJs (headsets?) are the best when it comes to any sound - bass, clarity etc. $2,000+ for headphones that cost $1 to make seem rediculous, I can't see how the sound will be amazing and calling it "concert hall" sound makes no sense as concert halls aren't usually the best way to describe the best quality of sound

[peteyt]

Mine cost around £20 and are decent and comfortable. If you want decent sound just use speakers.

[iJoe]

Nah, my 12 quid ones are doing me fine right now