Here's my thoughts on it:
the OCD; I don't believe this is feasible. For OCD I don't think it's possible to manifest such a thought to work towards something then destroy it. Ie, I don't believe it would actually make sense for someone (especially with OCD) to do something then do the opposite. It's not a normal trait because if you think of main-stream OCD as it's known with cleaning that's essentially sterilising an area then flinging dirt and faeces everywhere to start again - it's destructive and against the grain of what OCD compels normally. I guess it's possible but HIGHLY unlikely.
the DPA; There's a barrage of information surrounding and containing DPA. Most of it is inconcequencial here but to re-cap over the information you would need to fully grasp why it's not likely, compelled by law nor neccessary.
* Under DPA the information he would be implying would be information he can access. His only 'personal' information in which he could hold protest to would be his own personal profile. His IP is of course his own personal information but Habbox are not compelled to remove it as it's not accessable nor given out as that would of course be highly unethical. As such, only trusted members of staff could/are able to access such information. So the information in which he could demand to be removed is only the information he can EASILY remove.
* when he signed up, he agreed to the terms and conditions of Habbox, which included the fact that any information he adds to our community is owned intellectually at least by habbox and they're under no obligation to change/do such a thing under request for accounts as they still own them and of course the information left on them (ie the posts).
* legally under EU/international law the information in which wouldn't be surrounded/encased under DPA protection is such things as his IP and unseen information on which he has left a trace - this is under eu law for such thing as eBullying/grooming/predatory/illegal behaviour(s). Any information removed with the intention to hide any action would be accessory after the fact... but that's going too far into it!
Essentially the information on anyone's account is either deletable by them (personal information), removed (if you post information on this forum technically if it's personal it's removable under our rules) or shouldn't be removed ethically under the guidance of internet laws especially for monitoring of illegal behaviours - matt and/or his team need to store information for a 'reasonable time' in case any such behaviour arrises as they're obligied to act upon it.
Either way, it's invalid, silly and not even correct. DPA is being complied with and OCD wouldn't effect anything under that request.
Isn't there some sort of law were you can't agree to something without a parents consent if you're under the age of 18? Even today it doesn't mention anything about getting your parents permission to agree to the T&C, i could be talking a load of ****.
















