Godfather Tony

[Ajthedragon]

Whilst I'm sure it's all terrible and whatnot that Tony Blair has friends, the issue I'd like to address is why you insist on calling him Antony on the basis that Tony is (according to you) just a name he came up with to make us like him more yet you always called David Cameron, Dave. Do you just have an aversion to using the names people actually go by or is there some actual logic behind it?

I agree with this (and I support Tories hehe). Btw his names Anthony not Antony!

Frankly I don't see what all the bother is about. So what if he's friends with Murdoch? Frankly I couldn't care less.

[Mathew]

There is a world away from politics, Dan!

[Catzsy]

The problem is Dan is that you purposely target him on every occasion possible. It is not even handed. Many, many politicians of all colours have cosied up to Murdoch so why just mention him?

[Inseriousity.]

Poor Grace... his younger children get Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman as godparents and she gets... tony blair. Way to go, dad!!

[Technologic]

It was my understanding Tony Blair doesn't really have anything to do with anything any more.... Or am i wrong?

[-:Undertaker:-]

There is a world away from politics, Dan!

I thought you weren't going to comment again? or is it that you cannot answer the points I put forward?

The problem is Dan is that you purposely target him on every occasion possible. It is not even handed. Many, many politicians of all colours have cosied up to Murdoch so why just mention him?

I'm sure you were one of the ones who couldn't stop mentioning Murdoch before and after the 'hackgate', remember with the GOP thread you brought him up with no evidence trying to link him with Ron Paul (a slur)? yet at the same time, you can't stand it when I attack Saint Blair.

Well here it is, out in the open - the war monger Blair best 'friends' with Murdoch who you so detest.

It was my understanding Tony Blair doesn't really have anything to do with anything any more.... Or am i wrong?

He's Middle East 'Peace' Envoy still i'm sure, as you can see with the Arab Spring he's done a great job!

[Mathew]

I thought you weren't going to comment again? or is it that you cannot answer the points I put forward?

Hang on, don't comment with more smart comments unless you are going to answer the questions I put forward.

I won't be answering the points you put forward because you're unable to accept someone elses point of view and we'd get nowhere, just like every other occasion. Yes he made mistakes and yes I'm sure some people are interested, but at least I'm able to accept the fact that personal lives should be exactly that: personal. It's none of your business what he does away from politics and funnily enough, this doesn't concern that directly.

I never noticed quite how rubbish your attitude is when things don't go your way!

[-:Undertaker:-]

I won't be answering the points you put forward because you're unable to accept someone elses point of view and we'd get nowhere, just like every other occasion. Yes he made mistakes and yes I'm sure some people are interested, but at least I'm able to accept the fact that personal lives should be exactly that: personal. It's none of your business what he does away from politics and funnily enough, this doesn't concern that directly.

Of course I don't accept your points, thats what a debate is - and if you don't like your post being challenged with actual evidence-backed points as I provided (and you did not), then don't be suprised when I take you to task on it. As for Mr. Blair, the deal between a media tycoon and a former Prime Minister is in the public interest and concerning privacy - Mr. Blair isn't entitled to any when he countless liberties whilst in office.

I never noticed quite how rubbish your attitude is when things don't go your way!

Isn't that you? you tried to have a go, I came back, you didn't want to respond but then thought you'd throw in another clever-arse comment.

If you can't handle the heat, then get out of the kitchen!

"i won't be replying because yet again, yourself and the daily mail have blown one small finding way out of proportion and looking into things far too deeply. i won't be getting into a never-ending cycle of posts again."

Take up your own advice.

[Chippiewill]

Most people in the public eye tend to end up being friends with other people in the public eye. It was by chance that Tony (He wants that name we shall call him by it out of respect) has things in common with Murdoch so they ended up being friends. No point looking too closely into it because if you look closely enough at anything you'll find a pattern.

Take up your own advice.

*cough* A5 *cough*

[Catzsy]

I thought you weren't going to comment again? or is it that you cannot answer the points I put forward?



I'm sure you were one of the ones who couldn't stop mentioning Murdoch before and after the 'hackgate', remember with the GOP thread you brought him up with no evidence trying to link him with Ron Paul (a slur)? yet at the same time, you can't stand it when I attack Saint Blair.

Well here it is, out in the open - the war monger Blair best 'friends' with Murdoch who you so detest.



He's Middle East 'Peace' Envoy still i'm sure, as you can see with the Arab Spring he's done a great job!

Oh really?

These are recent threads relating to and producing pictures of Blair and Gedaffi amongst many, many you have posted.
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...924&highlight=
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...931&highlight=
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...169&highlight=
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...188&highlight=

Find me a thread or any long history at all that I have posted about Murdoch. I don't think my 'fixation' is any where near as powerful as yours. I don't detest him anyway just felt that he was powermad and did have too close relationships with many, many politicians but you just seem to single one out all the time. Very subjective threads.