Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 76
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    11,187
    Tokens
    6,058

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    No, I don't think Facebook should be banned for this who are under 18. It would be too late to enforce that rule now, anyway.

    There's already an age limit on Facebook (I'm sure it was 13+ ?) and, well, that didn't exactly go down very well. People can put what they want on Facebook, at the end of the day it'll be them getting in trouble for what they do. It would be nice to have some sort of rules or maybe if the report button actually worked, then it would be a lot better.

    I know longer use Facebook because I'm sick of seeing all this pointless banter and ********** on it, but when I did use it, I found that it was a great way to start off conversation in real life. You'd see something on Facebook and then you'd use that information to talk to your friends. I used it for so much, not only was I up to date with what was going on in my local area, but I could arrange things easily with my friends.

    Like @Bethie said, if their parents don't want them to be on Facebook, then it should be their job to stop them going on it.


  2. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,757
    Tokens
    3,934
    Habbo
    Paige.

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ,AAiden View Post
    The thing is kids are getting smart these days, deleting history. And most parent don't even know they have them. (I would of given u rep but i have to wait 19:34 hours.)
    Indeed kids are smart these days which is why there isn't much point in banning them from Facebook because as me and @Catchy mentioned earlier, they would probably find a way to swerve the actions taken to prevent them from accessing Facebook. It is also true that some parents don't even realise that they have Facebook but it is still down to them to ensure the safety of their child and if anything did happen to their child, may it rest on their head.
    cats > you

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    5,492
    Tokens
    21,741

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paige. View Post
    Indeed kids are smart these days which is why there isn't much point in banning them from Facebook because as me and @Catchy mentioned earlier, they would probably find a way to swerve the actions taken to prevent them from accessing Facebook. It is also true that some parents don't even realise that they have Facebook but it is still down to them to ensure the safety of their child and if anything did happen to their child, may it rest on their head.
    I know but you could be the most caring and best mother or father in the world but still not know about it...
    i used to put the names of my favourite singers here... then i realised nobody cared

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,757
    Tokens
    3,934
    Habbo
    Paige.

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RyRy View Post
    Me & @FlyingJesus would both agree that this would be a terrible idea. Facebook is a great source of... gossip.
    haha I agree

    Quote Originally Posted by McDonalds View Post
    No, I don't think Facebook should be banned for this who are under 18. It would be too late to enforce that rule now, anyway.

    There's already an age limit on Facebook (I'm sure it was 13+ ?) and, well, that didn't exactly go down very well. People can put what they want on Facebook, at the end of the day it'll be them getting in trouble for what they do. It would be nice to have some sort of rules or maybe if the report button actually worked, then it would be a lot better.

    I know longer use Facebook because I'm sick of seeing all this pointless banter and ********** on it, but when I did use it, I found that it was a great way to start off conversation in real life. You'd see something on Facebook and then you'd use that information to talk to your friends. I used it for so much, not only was I up to date with what was going on in my local area, but I could arrange things easily with my friends.

    Like @Bethie said, if their parents don't want them to be on Facebook, then it should be their job to stop them going on it.
    As you've proved in the part that I've outlined in bold, if users find they don't enjoy Facebook for whatever reason, may it be bullying or pointless arguments, they can just stop using Facebook and deactivate their account. There is no need to moan about cyber bullying on Facebook because the victims should just leave the site? Yes I know there are other sites they could use to target the victim on but why don't they just block the bullies. I would've said stop using the sites but it's not fair that the bullies would've stopped them from using and enjoying the social networking sites.
    Also I'm sure I made the point that parents should be held responsible for their child's safety

    ---------- Post added 25-03-2012 at 08:59 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by ,AAiden View Post
    I know but you could be the most caring and best mother or father in the world but still not know about it...
    I know but what I'm trying to say is that it's their job to make sure they know their child is safe and this includes the internet. They should know what their child goes on and go to all lengths to find out and ensure that their child is safe.
    Last edited by Paige.; 25-03-2012 at 08:13 PM.
    cats > you

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    11,187
    Tokens
    6,058

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paige. View Post
    haha I agree



    As you've proved in the part that I've outlined in bold, if users find they don't enjoy Facebook for whatever reason, may it be bullying or pointless arguments, they can just stop using Facebook and deactivate their account. There is no need to moan about cyber bullying on Facebook because the victims should just leave the site? Yes I know there are other sites they could use to target the victim on but why don't they just block the bullies. I would've said stop using the sites but it's not fair that the bullies would've stopped them from using and enjoying the social networking sites.
    Also I'm sure I made the point that parents should be held responsible for their child's safety

    ---------- Post added 25-03-2012 at 08:59 PM ----------



    I know but what I'm trying to say is that it's their job to make sure they know their child is safe and this includes the internet. They should know what their child goes on and go to all lengths to find out and ensure that their child is safe.
    As much as I'd love to deactivate my account, I do sometimes have to use Facebook for organising when I'm meeting up with friends.

    It's a shame though, there are many reasons I'd think it would be good to ban children from Facebook but it wouldn't work and some people aren't immature like the rest. I know many people will live to regret what they're posted on Facebook, haha.


  6. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    England
    Posts
    3,757
    Tokens
    3,934
    Habbo
    Paige.

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by McDonalds View Post
    As much as I'd love to deactivate my account, I do sometimes have to use Facebook for organising when I'm meeting up with friends.

    It's a shame though, there are many reasons I'd think it would be good to ban children from Facebook but it wouldn't work and some people aren't immature like the rest. I know many people will live to regret what they're posted on Facebook, haha.
    Yeah, there are many advantages to using Facebook
    I agree and yeah it wouldn't work cause people would just swerve the actions taken place as said earlier and also like you said, some people aren't immature like the rest and they do use Facebook nicely and treat users with respect so it wouldn't really be fair on them Same haha and I regret some of the things I've posted on there so I tend to not post anything anymore, I just occasionally go on it to see what the latest gossip it
    cats > you

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    79
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I think all the safety features that you can turn on with facebook now, should be forced for Children. Their profile should not be allowed to be made public and they need to accept you before you can see anything.

    Haters don't like, we got the spotlight

  8. #38

    Default

    I don't think there should be an 18 age limit on facebook, Then people could do the lottery before they could register to facebook?

    But i do think facebook need to enforce there current rule of i believe 12+ (may be mistaken), But cousin who clearly isnt 12, (his 8) is on facebook. I think I didn't even have a playstation when i was 7, he has a laptop, a ps3, a 360 a mobile phone. I think in a whole we need to treat kids more like kids until there old enough to understand the world.

    So 12 is a good age if 12 actually meant 12. Age ranges need to be enforced on a whole. I mean Isn't habbo's age 11? I knew many people under 11 back in the day I played habbo.

    -Matt

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,994
    Tokens
    8,306
    Habbo
    Rubbish

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Frijj View Post
    I don't think there should be an 18 age limit on facebook, Then people could do the lottery before they could register to facebook?

    But i do think facebook need to enforce there current rule of i believe 12+ (may be mistaken), But cousin who clearly isnt 12, (his 8) is on facebook. I think I didn't even have a playstation when i was 7, he has a laptop, a ps3, a 360 a mobile phone. I think in a whole we need to treat kids more like kids until there old enough to understand the world.

    So 12 is a good age if 12 actually meant 12. Age ranges need to be enforced on a whole. I mean Isn't habbo's age 11? I knew many people under 11 back in the day I played habbo.

    -Matt
    Thing is it's sort of impossible to enforce them on a whole, there's always going to be underage people on sites such as Facebook and Habbo. The only thing I could think of to actually stop it would be "Upon registration a copy of your identification is needed" but that would never happen because for one it would take far too long and two I think companies such as Habbo and Facebook are full on aware that younger people use their services but just turn a blind eye.

    Saying that however I do remember when people used to be perm banned on Habbo back in the day if they admitted they were underage.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    No, waste of money to over-regulate a non-problem. Provided the parents of the user keeps an eye on their usage and privacy is promoted in the household and at school, like it should be in this day and age, there should be little call for concern like there is at the moment. Facebook has pretty good privacy and security controls for users who register under certain ages, and that's all that can be done. There's no point creating laws or getting Facebook to restrict access to certain ages when it can easily be avoided.

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •