They're completely different services. Habbo primarily functions as a MMORPG, and adds social networking tools as a secondary service. Facebook and Twitter are strictly social networking sites. Because Habbo is a MMORPG, they have limited safety and security features for joining the service which is natural for MMORPGs because the whole point is to openly discuss and interact with other players. This is why Habbo is in trouble because their service is focused on teens, incl. sexually under aged users. They have to put extra effort into real time moderation, because there is no filtering of users at sign up and no security settings to filter who can talk to you and who can't. Again, they cannot add these features as it will completely change the service and put people off, and there's the risk of people lying (like people signing up who are 11 when the minimum age is 13).
What if they come looking for you? It's not difficult to build up trust over time or let your guard down. It's natural.
Clearly not, otherwise they wouldn't of got so much information in the report and be under fire by so many users who have also noticed sexually explicit content.
That misses the point. Habbo is advertised as a safe community, so instinctively you assume it won't be filled with paedophiles or mature discussions. Although it is a minority, Habbo hasn't got the tools currently to stop these discussions and these sorts of users from accessing the service. It's why Habbo has muted it, because they are clueless as to what to doMy opinion is that they should just shut off the client and display a message saying it's undergoing maintenance because of this, that and the other - but that's just an opinion.
You're usually not alone in the street, so it's difficult to find privacy to have these sorts of conversations. Also, Facebook and Twitter have features in place to hide your identity and only allow you to add who you want. The risk will always be there, but Habbo should be seriously reducing the risk.
Unfortunately, Habbo have completely messed up. The mute isn't Channel 4's fault, and you shouldn't blame them as it was Habbo who made the decision to mute everyone, which is a wise choice as like I said, they do not have the features or the man power to immediately focus on analysing the conversations and keep the hotel running as normal. It would be unwise for them to even attempt it, as they clearly do not have the tools at hand.
And you can try posting it over again, but it's the wrong stance to takeThe issue needs sorting once and for all, which is why the EC is involved. It's been a long time coming.







My opinion is that they should just shut off the client and display a message saying it's undergoing maintenance because of this, that and the other - but that's just an opinion.












