The 'lead by example' ethos is something I plan to bring to at the very least community departments. Forcing it on departments won't really work, there needs to be an attitude change before it can be successful. Some people view management as leading those who do the work so you can focus on the admin side. I see management as more responsibility while still doing the same job you were before. There are other benefits and less "normal staff" work should not be one of them.
However, I do not feel it is very fair to name and shame those you feel are not up to the job when you do not know the circumstances. "Reduced activity" is not a new term for Habbox and lots of people have used it over the years. Structures are not fixed and are open to interpretation by different department managers using their discretion (for example, my re-hiring policy as competitions manager was different to other departments). Each department is different and has its own set of needs that managers try their best to accomodate. The circumstances remain solely private between management and the staff member. By all means, attack the policy and the structure because sometimes these structures are open to abuse and therefore can be improved. I think when you get to management, part of the responsibility involved is allowing yourself to be open to relentless criticism (both constructive and not very constructive at all). Anyone below management does not deserve it so I would urge everyone please to keep the finger-pointing in check.








Reply With Quote


















