Next-Gen iPhone (iPhone 5?)

[GommeInc]

SNIP

So... I won the argument? Don't go back on my question. You asked me to point out where you said you are happy that Apple sell a different adapter to the rest. I responded I didn't, which is correct. Therefore, your posts explaining what you meant are irrelevant, as you clearly are asking me to point out where I said what I (did not) say.

What you've done is link to posts explaining where you failed to read the entire thread, which was literally based on you misreading my post that apparently I think you are happy that Apple use a different adapter (which we've established is incorrect) AND that Apple only do it to be annoying to their customers.

And again, where do I state that they only do it for individualism? Just because I say they do it to inconvenience their customers for the sake of individualism to Tomm does not mean only. Do you know why I said for individualism? Because I was speaking from the point of view of the customer, which was what Tomm and I were discussing the view point of, rather than the view point of the company making money - it was you that pointed out this rather irrelevant point and destroyed this thread (as you enjoy doing). Therefore:

Why would customers care about the economics behind Apple making money? Hence I never stated that, as the customer doesn't benefit from Apple selling an adapter which is an inconvenience to them, they only benefit for the basic need to charge their phones. Apple could use the mini-USB many other phone companies use (since smartphones have become the "in" thing, loads of functions, features and aesthetics have become standards), but they don't because they want to seperate their product from the rest to make extra money - although arguably this conversation is pointless because chargers come as a standard with the phone, so they rarely have to buy adapters unless misplaced or broken. Apple make most of their money through the sale of the actual phone (incl. the power cable), not through selling the accessories. £500+ vs. £30.

Gomme 6 - HotelUser 0

If this was tennis, I would have won and received a rather lovely trophy with my name on by now.

[HotelUser]

So... I won the argument? Don't go back on my question. You asked me to point out where you said you are happy that Apple sell a different adapter to the rest. I responded I didn't, which is correct. Therefore, your posts explaining what you meant are irrelevant, as you clearly are asking me to point out where I said what I (did not) say.

Awh, wouldn't it be convenient for you if all you had to do was answer one magical question so you can win some arbitrary argument on an internet forum? (p.s. this argument isn't about one single sentence. This argument is about why Apple uses custom connectors. You just never understood my sentence initially, and you continued to be ignorant to it this entire time).

Unfortunately for you when someone says something and you interpret it a certain way, that doesn't mean that the way you interpreted it is correct. I have explained atleast five times what I meant by what I said and you can either accept my meaning or reject it, not make up some other meaning which I didn't infer to at all. All my explanations are perfectly valid, because it was a rhetorical question in response to something you said.

What you've done is link to posts explaining where you failed to read the entire thread,

Here is my previous post which I'm going to title in my mind "Gomme can't read":

Show Hide

it takes you straight to the post where you accuse me of saying you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, an inconvenience (unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

Oh, you want to know what I meant by that? Why don't you freaking read these posts:


http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...92#post7648692
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...85#post7648585
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...94#post7648194
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...08#post7647508


In absolutely every single one of them I explain exactly what I meant by my sentence "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters". Since you don't understand how the internet works, let me show you:

I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else

I've spelt it out as crystal clear as humanly possible in my previous post as to exactly what I meant with regards to me not being happy about Apple's cords, but me understanding unlike you that they do it to make money. In my previous response it is quite evident that I never said you said I was happy about the cords, but that I said what I said to express (again...) that I am not happy about Apple's cords, but unlike you I understand that they do it to make money

GOMME: Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?


ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords

How many times do I have to tell you that when I said "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" that I was challenging your statement: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?" because I am infact not happy with their chargers.

I addressed this FIVE times previously, and here you are still not even sure I know what you're on about. If you told me you were high and drunk at the same time I would believe you, because it would take that level of stupidity to make such a huge oversight.


Would you like me to explain what I meant by that sentence again Gomme? Or is five times enough for you?

it takes you straight to the post where you accuse me of saying you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, an inconvenience (unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

Okay Gomme, you ready? Put your reading glasses on. Are they on? Good. I underlined the word "accuse" here. I did so because you are, again, putting words into my mouth. I never accused you of anything. If you don't understand what I meant by the sentence "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" then you only need to read the five quotes of my self above, and you should understand what I was saying

unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?

I'd like to dive into your mind and see how it works, truly I would. Here are several quotes of me in this thread:

I am infact not happy with their chargers.

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords. Pretty sure I pointed this out in my past post, AND my post before that, AND there's the fact that I never told you you thought I was happy with their cords to begin with.

ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer)

Does it look like I think it's convenient that Apple uses different chargers? Do you have alzheimer's?

Gomme 4 - HotelUser 0


And again no response to the claim that I said Apple only do it to inconvenience their users.

a) I've made like five posts about the same thing now and you just keep ignoring it (refer to all the above quotes which you've just not read or blatantly ignored)
b) I've already replied to your "claim" waaaay earlier in the thread. I told you that I think Apple does it because Apple likes to make money:

I'm fairly certain it's to force users to purchase Apple specific charging adapters from either Apple or companies who pay Apple royalties as so Apple can make more money.

Apple does it because they want to make a crapload of money.

It's possible you don't know anything about economics so I'll spell it out again for you, companies like to make money.

I think it's pretty damn obvious based off of those three statements by me in three different posts that I think Apple do it to make money, and NOT to promote isolationism and NOT to only inconvenience users. So I think you might need to rethink that score

I think I've won this argument, mainly because I've read the thread.

Yeah *looks up at your statements and all my replies to them in PREVIOUS posts* it sure looks like you've read the thread

Do you seriously think you can just snap your fingers, say I failed to read the thread and then make your statement true? I told you you failed to read the thread and then I proved that you failed to read the thread. Deal with it.

which was literally based on you misreading my post that apparently I think you are happy that Apple use a different adapter (which we've established is incorrect) AND that Apple only do it to be annoying to their customers.

Hey Gomme "tell me where I said that I think that you think that I am happy that apple uses a different adapter". Send me the exact post, quote the exact words. If you quote this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" I'm going to laugh in your face and redirect you to my previous post where I point out all your instances of epically failing to read anything properly.

And again, where do I state that they only do it for individualism? Just because I say they do it to inconvenience their customers for the sake of individualism to Tomm does not mean only.

Thanks for posting this, you've given me another opportunity to demonstrate that you don't read posts before you reply to them This is taken from my previous post:

"I think it's pretty damn obvious based off of those three statements by me in three different posts that I think Apple do it to make money, and NOT to promote isolationism and NOT to only inconvenience users."

notice how I say "NOT to only" only before inconveniencing users, and not before isolationism. I never said in my previous post that you said it was to *ONLY* promote isolationism. This is a classic case of Gomme putting words in HotelUser's mouth.

Do you know why I said for individualism? Because I was speaking from the point of view of the customer

I'm a consumer and I think Apple only does it to make money. If you think as a consumer that they do it promote individualism then that's the stupidest view I've ever heard. They do it to make money and they make money from doing it, simples.

Why would customers care about the economics behind Apple making money? Hence I never stated that, as the customer doesn't benefit from Apple using an adapter which is an inconvenience, they only benefit for the basic need to charge their phones. Apple could use the mini-USB many other phone companies use (since smartphones have become the "in" thing, loads of functions, features and aesthetics have become standards), but they don't because they want to seperate their product from the rest to make extra money - although arguably this conversation is pointless because chargers come as a standard with the phone, so they rarely have to buy adapters unless misplaced or broken. Apple make most of their money through the sale of the actual phone (incl. the power cable), not through selling the accessories. £500+ vs. £30. Unless you're suggesting consumers like to buy Apple accessories and not the product those accessories go with?

At every gas station I go into off the highway I see loads and loads of car adapters, and I see them at loads of other stores. They wouldn't be there if they didn't sell them.

Gomme 6 - HotelUser 0

If this was tennis, I would have won and received a rather lovely trophy with my name on by now.

HotelUser 7, Gomme -1, a net point loss for failure to read. If this was tennis I'd be running victory laps and you'd be standing in the middle of the court with a nose bleed, after having hitting yourself in the head with the ball numerous times.

In my last post:
1. you still didn't understand my "happy" sentence and I pointed out five times where I explained it.
2. You accused me of accusing you that you said you're happy they use a separate adapter and I challenged you on it. In your latest reply you never sent me the post where I make this accusation against you because I never did, it doesn't exist.
3. You thought I might have been saying it was an inconvenience that apple uses a different adapter than the standard one and I sent you 4 quotes of myself which state the exact opposite.
4. You thought I didn't reply to your claim that Apple only does it to inconvenience their users, and I produced three previous quotes of myself which had already responded to that claim.

Considering those 4 things, and the lackof you addressing any of them despite you quoting that post S:S:S) then I think you must be dreaming if you think you've "won" anything. They only thing you've "won" is managing to represent yourself as a fool to me.

[GommeInc]

Again you've not read the thread and make a colossal reply :rolleyes:

1. Where did I say you were happy Apple only use a unique adapter? The explanations you've given build off this, when I clearly never said this.

2. Where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users?

I don't care about the economics side as I was clearly talking from the viewpoint of the customer with the user @Tomm. It was your protectionist mentality that started your pointless ranting again.

Seriously David, read. You can explain what you meant by "being happy about Apple only using one type of adapter", but I honestly don't care, because I never said you were to begin with. Stop wasting your time with that one point because it is literally making you look stupid, the same for going on about the economics. I obviously know it is to make money - show me where I disagree? You assumed I did, like you assume the whole time.

Speaking of which, why aren't you having a go at @Tomm who doesn't understand why Apple use their charger and somewhat agree with my point that it is an inconvenience?

[HotelUser]

Again you've not read the thread and make a colossal reply :rolleyes:

The story of your life in this thread.

1. Where did I say you were happy Apple only use a unique adapter? The explanations you've given build off this, when I clearly never said this.

This entire problem stems from you seeing this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" and thinking I'm saying somebody is happy about the adapters. NOBODY is happy about the adapters. As I said in my six previous posts, that quote was a reply to this: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?". You suck at reading.

2. Where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users?

Did I say you said this as your opinion? No. You posted this:

unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?

And then I quoted four previous posts of my own which completely contradicted your idea of what I thought (I guess you just never read the thread, shocker). Don't you even remember you saying the above????? I guess not based on your confusion here.

I don't care about the economics side as I was clearly talking from the viewpoint of the customer with the user @Tomm. It was your protectionist mentality that started your pointless ranting again.

Asked and answered:

I'm a consumer and I think Apple only does it to make money. If you think as a consumer that they do it promote individualism then that's the stupidest view I've ever heard. They do it to make money and they make money from doing it, simples.

If you're just going to bring up the same things over and over I'm just going to continue requoting myself. You're a broken record.

Seriously David, read. You can explain what you meant by "being happy about Apple only using one type of adapter", but I honestly don't care, because I never said you were to begin with. Stop wasting your time with that one point because it is literally making you look stupid, the same for going on about the economics. I obviously know it is to make money - show me where I disagree? You assumed I did, like you assume the whole time.

WASTING MY TIME WITH THAT POINT LOL? IT TOOK 6 POSTS OF MINE FOR YOU TO FIGURE OUT WHAT I SAID AND IM STILL NOT CONVINCED

Speaking of which, why aren't you having a go at @Tomm who doesn't understand why Apple use their charger and somewhat agree with my point that it is an inconvenience?

Tomm isn't part of the extreme anti-Applists movement of 2k12, and I'm assuming unlike you that Tomm can probably read to some capacity, so it probably wouldn't have required 6 posts of explaining one sentence for him to understand it.

---

What, you're not going to address my most post #52 of this thread where you made an argument completely based on the fact that I used the word "only" before two items and not one and then I showed you that you misquoted me? I'm not surprised, what can you say, you were mistaken. You shouldn't have started this whole "you can't read" crap because you're certainly not perfect at all, and I've demonstrated numerous instances where your failure to read has gotten the best of you.

[Chippiewill]

Guys, guys - no one gives a ****, stop arguing like children

OP: That looks hideous it's probably a fake unless Johnny Ives has been smoking meth, and even then. Especially when we're seeing iPad 7" backs which continue the old trend of design.

[GommeInc]

The story of your life in this thread.

Yet you make another colossal reply again :rolleyes:

This entire problem stems from you seeing this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" and thinking I'm saying somebody is happy about the adapters. NOBODY is happy about the adapters. As I said in my six previous posts, that quote was a reply to this: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?". You suck at reading.

So why say it? I'm not "thinking somebody said it", you "actually", said it, by saying "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy", I didn't. Move on. I even replied to the bit where I asked "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread that customers ought to be protected?" saying that wasn't even anything to do with the adapters. Again, you suck at reading, by making assumptions :rolleyes:

Did I say you said this as your opinion? No. You posted this:

And then I quoted four previous posts of my own which completely contradicted your idea of what I thought (I guess you just never read the thread, shocker). Don't you even remember you saying the above????? I guess not based on your confusion here.

Yes, you did say it was my opinion, because you you posted this:

I'm fairly certain it's to force users to purchase Apple specific charging adapters from either Apple or companies who pay Apple royalties as so Apple can make more money. I'm not surprised to see you spouting out some random anti-Apple garbage which doesn't make any monetary sense for Apple to do though. Just because you don't like Apple Gomme, doesn't mean they're a religious cult that preaches "individualism" over the corporate objectives of making a crapload of money :rolleyes:

So: Where did I say they only do it for individualism? Answer the question this time, I know you can do it.

If you're just going to bring up the same things over and over I'm just going to continue requoting myself. You're a broken record.

Says the person who has been proven wrong so many times in this thread accusing me of putting words in your mouth when you said them yourself (with quotes). I never said you were happy Apple use a different adapter, you did. You're the broken record hell bent on destroying threads, like this one for example.

WASTING MY TIME WITH THAT POINT LOL? IT TOOK 6 POSTS OF MINE FOR YOU TO FIGURE OUT WHAT I SAID AND IM STILL NOT CONVINCED

Oh dear, the capital letters are coming out. You're only getting angry at your inability to read and write properly, by making accusations based on nothing. So, where did I say Apple don't do it to make money and where did I also say you're happy Apple inconvenience their users? You've not answered the quesiton, you keep quoting your posts which makes me wonder if you're arguing with yourself rather than me.

What, you're not going to address my most post #52 of this thread where you made an argument completely based on the fact that I used the word "only" before two items and not one and then I showed you that you misquoted me? I'm not surprised, what can you say, you were mistaken. You shouldn't have started this whole "you can't read" crap because you're certainly not perfect at all, and I've demonstrated numerous instances where your failure to read has gotten the best of you.

I never misquoted you, you mucked up your argument from the beginning by misreading my posts again and making accusations. One last time, where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users and you're happy they do that? Heck, let's assume my post about consumer protectionism was about this - where in that post does it explicitly say "You're happy that customerss aren't protected by the use of standard power cables" Come on, you can do it... or you can just admit you fail at arguments and resort to petty arguments where you try to redefine the definition of "happy" and rewrite your arguments, despite the fact you can look back at posts on here.

Just admit defeat HotelUser, you're seriously looking stupid -.- I probably should of kept with the idea of not feeding the troll, as your pure rage does seem to have effected your ability to read again :rolleyes:

Guys, guys - no one gives a ****, stop arguing like children

OP: That looks hideous it's probably a fake unless Johnny Ives has been smoking meth, and even then. Especially when we're seeing iPad 7" backs which continue the old trend of design.

Don't blame me if he gets over protective of Apple. It's hard explaining to a 10 year old where they went wrong in a thread.

Knowing these rumours that get released each year, it probably is fake. If it is real, Apple seem to of removed a few design features like making the buttons more appealing. Maybe they've discovered nearly everyone has their phones in a pouch or a case, so they dn't really care about making it pretty anymore, and hope someone else can make a case to do that for them.

[Recursion]

Guys, guys - no one gives a ****, stop arguing like children

OP: That looks hideous it's probably a fake unless Johnny Ives has been smoking meth, and even then. Especially when we're seeing iPad 7" backs which continue the old trend of design.

Quote for truth.

Not the iPhone 5, it'd be design suicide, IMO.

[HotelUser]

Quote for truth.

Not the iPhone 5, it'd be design suicide, IMO.

I'm used to dealing with people on the internet who have no idea what they're talking about. But honestly Tom, when I can pull this off:

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...53#post7648753

And literally just cut and paste previous posts of mine as replies to whatever he says, then it really just turns into madness because I don't think he's reading the thread before he speaks at all. It's not even as if to every item he brought up I was able to give him 1 quote of me already refuting it, but whenever he brought up anything I was able to give him several different posts of mine which already refuted whatever he says. In his latest reply below, he just does the same thing. He brings things up which never transpired, or which have already been discussed and then he tells me I can't read when 1. He doesn't give any facts to back up that claim, and 2. I've given him an entire post on a platter of me demonstrating he isn't reading the thread and you know what? He understood the post entirely wrong.

I love debating with you and Matt because when we debate you don't put words into my mouth, you don't quote me wrong, and you don't ignore my rebuttles and just repeat the "point". This guy on the other hand is a monster, and even for him he's hit a new all time low.

---

Yet you make another colossal reply again

Do you think before you speak? What do you think your reply is?

So why say it? I'm not "thinking somebody said it", you "actually", said it, by saying "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy", I didn't. Move on. I even replied to the bit where I asked "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread that customers ought to be protected?" saying that wasn't even anything to do with the adapters. Again, you suck at reading, by making assumptions

Another example of poor old Gomme not understanding how to read. Me saying that WAS IN RESPONSE TO YOU SAYING "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?" do you not remember accusing me of being a hypocrite? Jeez Gomme. Read my now SEVEN other posts which explain what this was in response to.


I


NEVER


said


you


called


me


happy


I've posted


SEVEN


posts saying this


READ THEM.

Yes, you did say it was my opinion, because you you posted this:




So: Where did I say they only do it for individualism? Answer the question this time, I know you can do it.

Where did I say you said it was only for individualism? You can't show me proof of that because there isn't any. I said this:

I'm fairly certain it's to force users to purchase Apple specific charging adapters from either Apple or companies who pay Apple royalties as so Apple can make more money. I'm not surprised to see you spouting out some random anti-Apple garbage which doesn't make any monetary sense for Apple to do though. Just because you don't like Apple Gomme, doesn't mean they're a religious cult that preaches "individualism" over the corporate objectives of making a crapload of money

In response to this:

They could, but they like to inconvenience their users for the sake of individualism

And neither of us use the words "only do it for individualism". Don't you even remember making that post? Would it refreshen your memory if I told you it was your post with moronic views which started this argument?

Says the person who has been proven wrong so many times in this thread accusing me of putting words in your mouth when you said them yourself (with quotes). I never said you were happy Apple use a different adapter, you did. You're the broken record hell bent on destroying threads, like this one for example.

This is me laughing in your ignorant face, as I direct you to this post:


http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...53#post7648753


You've yet to prove me wrong one time, yet I've proven you wrong with proof multiple


This is an example of poor old Gomme making up statements and not having any evidence to back them up.

Oh dear, the capital letters are coming out. You're only getting angry at your inability to read and write properly, by making accusations based on nothing. So, where did I say Apple don't do it to make money and where did I also say you're happy Apple inconvenience their users? You've not answered the quesiton, you keep quoting your posts which makes me wonder if you're arguing with yourself rather than me.




I never misquoted you, you mucked up your argument from the beginning by misreading my posts again and making accusations.

No, I'm getting angry at you repeating that I'm the one "misreading" when you've given me ZERO proof, when I've given LOTS of proof of your stupidity and inability to read:


http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...53#post7648753


I'm literally laughing in your face because you make negative accusations and they're 0% true for me and 100% true directed towards you, haha.

One last time, where did I say Apple only do it to inconvenience their users and you're happy they do that?

Are you stupid? I already addressed this in my previous post (which you didn't read). This was never said at all and you're just making up things in your cluttered little head. Do you remember saying this?


"unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?"


My response was to quote myself FOUR different times to validate your theory of what you "thought" I meant completely and horribly wrong.


Your responses are loads of crap if you're not going to read properly.


This is an example of how poor old gomme just can't read at all.

Heck, let's assume my post about consumer protectionism was about this - where in that post does it explicitly say "You're happy that customerss aren't protected by the use of standard power cables" Come on, you can do it... or you can just admit you fail at arguments and resort to petty arguments where you try to redefine the definition of "happy" and rewrite your arguments, despite the fact you can look back at posts on here.

Okay hold on, first of all, and for like the 8th time, NOBODY is happy Apple uses those cables, and it would protect the consumer MORE if they used STANDARD cables.


Second, this quote has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING (LMAO) to do with what I said at all. You thought (for some freaking strange reason, because I never once said it), that I thought you thought the ONLY reason Apple does it is for for individualism, and you thought that because of this:

"I think it's pretty damn obvious based off of those three statements by me in three different posts that I think Apple do it to make money, and NOT to promote isolationism and NOT to only inconvenience users."


notice how I say "NOT to only" only before inconveniencing users, and not before isolationism. I never said in my previous post that you said it was to *ONLY* promote isolationism. This is a classic case of Gomme putting words in HotelUser's mouth.

Clearly you didn't read my previous post (shocker), or otherwise you just lack the brain cells to understand simply English.

Just admit defeat HotelUser, you're seriously looking stupid -.- I probably should of kept with the idea of not feeding the troll, as your pure rage does seem to have effected your ability to read again

This is me laughing in your illiterate face. Just because you "say" you've proven me wrong and that I can't read doesn't make it true. You've yet to show me one piece of evidence to the contrary.


When it comes to you on the other hand, you got nailed for not reading the thread here:


http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...53#post7648753


That's pathetic, give up.

Don't blame me if he gets over protective of Apple. It's hard explaining to a 10 year old where they went wrong in a thread.

Don't sell yourself short now poor old gomme

[GommeInc]

snip

Another lengthy reply again I see

1. Why say I did? It's in black and white that you said I think you're happy Apple only use one type of adapter. How many times do I need to keep directing you to that post? The first time you suggested I put words in your mouth (yet I can't edit other peoples posts) and the next you try to explain what you mean. Explain all you like, I never said you are happy about it. You're literally asking for an argument where there isn't one.

2. You suggested I said you were happy in a post. It's in black and white yet you fail to acknowledge this then accuse me of not knowing what economics is when I clearly have had no interests in talking to Tomm about the economics of Apple's business decisions when we were clearly talking from a consumer viewpoint -.-

3. I think it's incredibly disgusting to joke about Alzheimers and I honestly am losing the will to reply to your pathetic, immature and disgusting posts. Alzheimers is an emotionally and physically draining disease, yet you bring it into a discussion with your potent remarks and lust for unnecessary discussions because you feel the need to protect Apple when there is no need to protect it as it wasn't even being attacked to begin with. It's so low of you, but then again you've always been one to be low. Truely pathetic.

[HotelUser]

Another lengthy reply again I see

Hypocrite as per usual

1. Why say I did? It's in black and white that you said I think you're happy Apple only use one type of adapter.

2. You suggested I said you were happy in a post. It's in black and white

Here's my problem with you. You keep rebringing this back up even though I've answered it once or twice...

a) I've made like five posts about the same thing now and you just keep ignoring it (refer to all the above quotes which you've just not read or blatantly ignored)

Unfortunately for you when someone says something and you interpret it a certain way, that doesn't mean that the way you interpreted it is correct. I have explained atleast five times what I meant by what I said and you can either accept my meaning or reject it, not make up some other meaning which I didn't infer to at all. All my explanations are perfectly valid, because it was a rhetorical question in response to something you said.

(unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

I am infact not happy with their chargers.

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords. Pretty sure I pointed this out in my past post, AND my post before that, AND there's the fact that I never told you you thought I was happy with their cords to begin with.

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)


GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU


ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords

I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer)

This entire problem stems from you seeing this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" and thinking I'm saying somebody is happy about the adapters. NOBODY is happy about the adapters. As I said in my six previous posts, that quote was a reply to this: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?". You suck at reading.

.....

I don't know what to do at this point, because I've given you an answer. It's not my fault you don't like my answer and it's not my fault you want to keep bringing the same question up but I think you should stop. I've explained what I meant by it like 800 times in those quotes (some are quotes of quotes (wow)), so you just need to deal with it.

yet you fail to acknowledge this then accuse me of not knowing what economics is when I clearly have had no interests in talking to Tomm about the economics of Apple's business decisions when we were clearly talking from a consumer viewpoint -.-

You don't understand economics because you think companies like Apple do things to ultimately prove points, not make money....

3. I think it's incredibly disgusting to joke about Alzheimers and I honestly am losing the will to reply to your pathetic, immature and disgusting posts. Alzheimers is an emotionally and physically draining disease, yet you bring it into a discussion with your potent remarks and lust for unnecessary discussions because you feel the need to protect Apple when there is no need to protect it as it wasn't even being attacked to begin with. It's so low of you, but then again you've always been one to be low. Truely pathetic.

It's a good thing only one of us is being pathetic and immature :rolleyes:

As per usual, your failure to read is your one and only weakness, and causes yet another pointless discussion in a thread because "you're too serious" and defensive of Apple (this post is evident of it). Point out the part in my post where I said you were happy Apple did this. You would notice I didn't say this, mainly because you cast aspersions and merely make assumptions because you seem to really like pointless discussions and have the ineptitude to read. Well done David, this is thread two you've derailed.

You would notice a -rep which should act as a sign that your reputation as being reasonable and logical in your approach to discussions is in tatters. Also, well done ignoring most of my post yet again and only reading what you want to read (which isn't there). Jeez.

From now on I won't "Feed the Troll", as you clearly have no interest in reading any posts, and I honestly do not have the energy to further belittle you.

--------------------------------------------------------

edit: Replying to Gomme The-Broken-Record was really easy this time. All I had to do was cut and paste to prove his lack of ability to read