Next-Gen iPhone (iPhone 5?)

[GommeInc]

Because you said you aren't a moderator, and then later on you said /end thread. You're not the OP, or a moderator as you told me yourself so you cant close a thread. It was playful of me to say that on my part, yet you take everything so seriously. Why so serious son?

And that's the definition of hypocrite... how exactly? So because I said I am not a moderator, and I said /end of thread, that must de factor mean I am a moderator? Where are these powers then? The only amusing thing about it is that yet again you've messed up simple English.

I did read the thread, it was you who assumed somewhere (yet to get proof) that I said you like the idea Apple inconvenience their users, and then went on a rant about economics assuming no-one knows about economic business decisions and basic marketing strategy. I even replied to your posts expanding on this (though expanding is pointless, I never said it, so why expand on something someone never said?) The only proof you gave were links to posts you've made, rather than posts I made. You looked as though you were arguing with yourself, rather than with anyone in particular. And then to try and make yourself look smart you brought a serious, destructive disease to try and win over the thread, when actually it made you look rather pathetic.

Show Hide

P.S. A person can only be a hypocrite if strong moral values or beliefs highlight a quality inferred by the person pretending to be something they are not. So if I said I hate moderators and I am glad I am not one, then I would only be a hypocrite if I actually were a moderator and like them. It would only really work if I said I am a moderator and improve my self worth. If anything the word you were looking for is "liar", because you must be a moderator to say "/end of thread" when clearly I am not one, but even then as I clearly do not have the powers associated with a moderator I must clearly be telling the truth.

<Basic English 101>

[HotelUser]

And that's the definition of hypocrite... how exactly? So because I said I am not a moderator, and I said /end of thread, that must de factor mean I am a moderator? Where are these powers then? The only amusing thing about it is that yet again you've messed up simple English.

The only one (as per usual) who's messed up simple English is you and by arguing this further you're the biggest and most annoying hypocrite on the entire forum.

I'm not a moderator, super moderator or member of management

/end of thread

Remember saying that hypocrite? If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen :rolleyes:

I did read the thread,

And once again I find myself laughing in your face. For anyone who wants evidence against the fact that Gomme read the thread, you need not look further than my posts here:

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...64#post7649564
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...58#post7648858
and ESPECIALLY http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...92#post7649492

I should NOT be able to respond to you by just quoting myself, and it's happened a lot now. Your posts are worthless because you just repeat yourself over and over.

it was you who assumed somewhere (yet to get proof) that I said you like the idea Apple inconvenience their users

Are you KIDDING me? Here's what went down (since you're too unintelligent to remember):

(unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

because I am infact not happy with their chargers.

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords.

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)


GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU


ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords.

I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer)

(unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?)

because I am infact not happy with their chargers.

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords.

ME: Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters (in other words, I do not approve of Apple's custom cords)


GOMME: YOU CANT READ YOURE A TROLL IM GIVING YOU MINUS REP I HAVE THE POWER TO BELITTLE YOU


ME: *explains to you thoroughly what I meant by me not being happy about Apple using different adapters, using bold, italics and green font to make it very direct and easy to see what aspects of your post I am replying to*

Pretty sure I state right there that I never said you said I was happy with the cords.

I was agreeing with you that it's stupid how Apple uses different adapters then everyone else (limits the consumer)

I was responding to something YOU said. It's bad enough that your disease prohibits you from remembering things I say, but dear god atleast remember the things you say to me: "unless you're saying it is a convenience Apple use a different adapter than what is the standard these days...?".

I know you're just going to either ignore this, or reply to it accusing me again without giving any evidence to backup what you say, so here is me laughing in your face once more because unlike you I don't say things without trying to actually back them up :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes: :rolleyes:

When I argue with people usually they try to use what I say against me, not forget what they've said themselves, not read my reply properly to what they've said and then reply saying the stupidest thing ever.

Show Hide

P.S. A person can only be a hypocrite if strong moral values or beliefs highlight a quality inferred by the person pretending to be something they are not. So if I said I hate moderators and I am glad I am not one, then I would only be a hypocrite if I actually were a moderator and like them. It would only really work if I said I am a moderator and improve my self worth. If anything the word you were looking for is "liar", because you must be a moderator to say "/end of thread" when clearly I am not one, but even then as I clearly do not have the powers associated with a moderator I must clearly be telling the truth.

<Basic English 101>

Doesn't have to be "strong" moral values, and don't you remember what you said poor Gomme? You didn't say you hate moderators, you said you're not one.

Here's what went down:

*I say something which would require moderator perms*

*You say you're not a moderator*

*You say something which would require moderator perms*

*I tell you you're a hypocrite for believing you can't preform moderator actions, and then later on proceed as if you can*

hypocrite, and I don't think Habbox wants you to be a moderator

[GommeInc]

I see you've made another lenghty response where you spend most of your time just quoting yourself. I never said you were happy, so stop trying to explain what I never said. You know that point I said where you seem to be arguing with yourself? That post answers it.

So I'm a moderator then? I wasn't aware of this... Go back to school HotelUser, and learn English. I think my point went over your head (but seeing as it's been answered how low you are to resolve to harsh diseases, it wouldn't take much). Point out where I said I am a moderator? You do know my "/end of thread" remark was because you appear to keep repeating yourself and this discussion is getting no where? It was at that, not actually to close the thread. I mean, you would have to be incredibly stupid to assume I can close a thread by saying "/end of thread". Don't you agree?

(The above was a rhetorical question).

EDIT: Also if you agreed you wouldn't of asked me to point out where I said you were happy Apple limit their adapters to only their product (isolationism) and spent 4 pages of this thread arguing with yourself about what you mean by what you clearly said. As I never said that, then the argument is done "end of discussion" (I would say end of thread, but you're too daft to know what I mean by that).

Also, well done on further lowering yourself by now accusing me of having alzheimer's. You know where I said people who resort to that tactic to win an argument are pathetic? Well done

[HotelUser]

I see you've made another lenghty response

Another lengthy reply again I see

Hypocrite as per usual

Another lengthy reply again I see

Hypocrite as per usual

where you spend most of your time just quoting yourself.

I should NOT be able to respond to you by just quoting myself, and it's happened a lot now. Your posts are worthless because you just repeat yourself over and over.

It's not even an argument anymore. He keeps saying the same thing over and over and I keep sending him previous posts where I've already addressed what he's said. I'd be really excited if he decided to advance his conversation further, but as it stands he's just a giant broken record.

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...64#post7649564

I never said you were happy

Okay hold on, first of all, and for like the 8th time, NOBODY is happy Apple uses those cables

So I'm a moderator then? I wasn't aware of this... Go back to school HotelUser, and learn English.

Quote where I tell you that you're a moderator :S:S:S because I don't.

I mean, you would have to be incredibly stupid to assume I can close a thread by saying "/end of thread". Don't you agree?

(The above was a rhetorical question).

And unlike you I don't fuss over and try to answer rhetorical questions

EDIT: Also if you agreed you wouldn't of asked me to point out where I said you were happy Apple limit their adapters to only their product (isolationism) and spent 4 pages of this thread arguing with yourself about what you mean by what you clearly said. As I never said that, then the argument is done "end of discussion" (I would say end of thread, but you're too daft to know what I mean by that).

I wasn't arguing with myself, infact I wasn't arguing with anybody. I was reating myself over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over because you consistently ignored what I was saying and just repeated your question back to me.

You can't tell me if I do or do not agree with something, you're not allowed to. Only I'm allowed to do that, because only I am me. You don't like that, and you misconstrued what I said, which made yourself out to look like a fool for 4 pages and that's your fault, not mine. Your scapegoat can't be "well you must feel this way instead," because you're not me and (thank **** for me) you can't control how I think or what I say (only how many times I have to say it).

Also, well done on further lowering yourself by now accusing me of having alzheimer's. You know where I said people who resort to that tactic to win an argument are pathetic? Well done

Oh, grow the heck up Gomme, I know lots of people who have Alzheimer's and even have an immediate family members who has Alzheimer's so I'm not going to sit here for one second and let a fool on an internet forum lecture me about the severity of the subject. If you don't like the fact that I'd rather use the word lightly instead of with a full stint of worried depression then that's something you'll just have to deal with, OR send me a scan of your brain to prove you don't have it - you know how much I love people supporting their arguments (and how much I dislike your lack of supporting yours)

[mrwoooooooo]

can a mod just close this thread?