number of jobs a staff can have (at once)

[CaptainAce]

What part of my post was difficult to understand? You said that attempting to handle more than 4 jobs while maintaining quality is impossible, I said that you're wrong. I really don't see how you can miss what's being talked about when it's the entire thread topic

I did not say impossible LOL Wow, dunno where you pulled that one from haha.
But ok :rolleyes:

[Inseriousity.]

I do remember though that there was a rule whereby you couldn't be a trialist in two community departments, does this still occur @inseriousity.

It's not something that's really enforced, no. Perhaps there's an argument for it to be forced but again I think it's down to the individual and manager to say 'yep I can handle two trials at the same time.' I mean if you passed them both youd technically be doing two jobs at the same time anyway so I wouldn't be particularly annoyed if the rule remained in its dormant state.

[Kyle]

When a staff member commits themselves equally to each of job then I have no qualms, but when they simply treat each of their roles as a volunteer as chores rather than avocations that they're supposed to be at least a little bit passionate about, it becomes a worry.

It's not a matter of things "getting too much", it's just that you can't possibly fully commit with enough enthusiasm to each role, as shown by the fact that that you set aside a certain amount of time for each thing, get it done, then move on. Meeting your minimum requirements and then buggering off for the rest of the month doesn't make you a good staff member.

You said you've been away for the last motnh yet you've been on habbo throughout hxss... RULE BREAK
@Samanfa;

[FlyingJesus]

I did not say impossible LOL Wow, dunno where you pulled that one from haha.
But ok :rolleyes:

I pulled it from your earlier post:

If you have more then four jobs how can you devote your time to each one and provide quality? You cannot

I made the part where you stated it to be impossible stand out so that you could find it easily, since you seem unable to remember things that you've actually said

[CaptainAce]

I pulled it from your earlier post:



I made the part where you stated it to be impossible stand out so that you could find it easily, since you seem unable to remember things that you've actually said

Dunno if you noticed but.. Er it doesn't say impossible. Lets agree to disagree because I have better things to be doing then arguing, thanks

[Kardan]

Dunno if you noticed but.. Er it doesn't say impossible. Lets agree to disagree because I have better things to be doing then arguing, thanks

You imply that it's impossible, so he's perfectly correct in what he's saying.

Personally I just feel this thread is a personal attack, if someone feels as if they've got a problem with a certain member in a certain position, then they should contact their manager. There's no need for a limit on positions.

[lawrawrrr]

I agree with her. I don't think it's possible to put out top quality in each department equally throughout the month if you've got multiple. I even give up occasionally and barely do the minimum (when i've had a bad day/week in that department). Doesn't mean I'm not passionate about it.

[Kardan]

I agree with her. I don't think it's possible to put out top quality in each department equally throughout the month if you've got multiple. I even give up occasionally and barely do the minimum (when i've had a bad day/week in that department). Doesn't mean I'm not passionate about it.

It is easily possible for some people to put in top quality work in each department - they won't be able to put their maximum in of course, but it's perfectly possible for people to do a good job.

[Samantha]

When a staff member commits themselves equally to each of job then I have no qualms, but when they simply treat each of their roles as a volunteer as chores rather than avocations that they're supposed to be at least a little bit passionate about, it becomes a worry.

It's not a matter of things "getting too much", it's just that you can't possibly fully commit with enough enthusiasm to each role, as shown by the fact that that you set aside a certain amount of time for each thing, get it done, then move on. Meeting your minimum requirements and then buggering off for the rest of the month doesn't make you a good staff member.

You said you've been away for the last motnh yet you've been on habbo throughout hxss... RULE BREAK
@Samanfa;

No I was away until the 11th August, meaning I was back in time for HxSS, if you didn't notice I wasn't on everyday during the HxSS as it got boring after a while. I was setting times to keep it simple for those who didn't understand, I rarely stick to them. August was such a bad month for me and I'll admit it, I was late for all my Competitions with being away but for the majority of other roles I did try get work done regardless of that.

[Catchy]

Why does it matter? Your point about it being greedy because other people might want roles in the department isn't valid because positions are always becoming available...