number of jobs a staff can have (at once)

[lawrawrrr]

You're not saying suddenly, but you are implying it by saying "4 is fine, but I cannot see how anyone can handle 5".

As has been said earlier in the thread, some people may not be able to do more than 4, but you shouldn't stop the people that are able too.

That's not what I'm saying at all, you're just reading what you want to read.

I said... I don't understand how people have time for more than 4 as I have no life and have no extra spare time, therefore no time for other departments.

[Kardan]

That's not what I'm saying at all, you're just reading what you want to read.

I said... I don't understand how people have time for more than 4 as I have no life and have no extra spare time, therefore no time for other departments.

Just because you don't understand does not mean it's not possible.

[lawrawrrr]

Just because you don't understand does not mean it's not possible.

From every example I've seen, people with 4+ deparments don't have the best quality reports/edits/graphics etc etc etc

[Kardan]

From every example I've seen, people with 4+ deparments don't have the best quality reports/edits/graphics etc etc etc

This does not mean it isn't possible. And of course, quality is just your opinion. You've also said that people with 4 departments aren't as good as 1

[Grig]

I don't care about amount of jobs. It's up to the said person. What I care about is the fact managers should be doing the same work as normal staff. News managers writing 2 articles, radio managers DJing 3 slots etc. It's only fair and something I know @Inseriousity.; agrees with. It's so silly how managers think "it takes too much time". I know from experience that you can fit that in, especially in news.

[nvrspk4]

The arguments in this thread are absurd.

If you are doing multiple things, yes you cannot give your "best" to one thing, but by that argument no staff should have more than one job else they can't give their best. Even if a staff member is not doing his or her "best potential" in a department, he or she still could be in the top half or even near the top in every department in which he or she works. The argument that four is somehow a magic number is entirely unsupported by fact or logical reasoning and seems to be spawned by self-interest rather than rationality.

Furthermore, the concern that staff cannot do a good job in multiple departments is completely unfounded. If they're not doing a good job they get fired. If they're not getting fired, it's the manager's fault not theirs. Plus General Management has taken aggressive steps to address the problem of staff activity so YAY them and problem solved (and even if not, it has nothing to do with a job limit).

Even if this thread wasn't intended to be targeted, seems like this thread in general is directed at specific people instead of making decisions with regards to specific policies.

It's also lovely to see the Habbox Staff jumping on each other - isn't there a rule about criticizing each other in public to...you know...act like a team? Honestly I feel like the staff down each other in Feedback more than the members do nowadays. It's like watching Mean Girls. And there's also no excuse for members to call out individual staff members in public. That also used to be against the rules, but so long as staff members (and its across multiple feedback threads not this) have as much infighting as the HabboxLive diva era at its worst Mean Girls.

Sorry random rant. Also if this was facebook I would have liked every one of @FlyingJesus and @Kardan's posts. Also I had like 6 or 7 jobs at one point and I have managed four different departments not including my General Management positions (not at the same time, but the fact that I made manager shows that you can put in quality work). I've also seen people put in more work than entire departments when things like Habbo Big Brother happened or during HxSS when we used the Executive Organizer model. Yes it's over a short period but it shows that people do have the capacity to handle that kind of workload if they prioritize it.

[Aiden]

Does it really matter how many jobs someone else has? Does it really effect you? If they can handle it then why not?

[CaptainAce]

Everyone is saying it's okay if you can handle it.. But some people can't handle it who don't want to admit it.

[Samantha]

Everyone is saying it's okay if you can handle it.. But some people can't handle it who don't want to admit it.

Look not being funny but I know you're talking about me, I'm not arguing but just come out and target me if you want. Also, you may not know if they can handle it, there's more to roles than what meets the eye.

I don't see why people need to go on about this, I agree with nvr some people I know it's targeted at do a great job in their roles. This was a targeting thread in the ops post.

[CaptainAce]

I'm not targetting anyone. Thats the situation that some departments will probably face both now and in the future.