number of jobs a staff can have (at once)

[Kardan]

yeah agreed, people thought i was targetting ollz/gina in my starz thread but i wasnt, people like to read what they want to read and distort everyone else's view to that as well.

You weren't targeting people in this thread, other people were

[Yonder]

I haven't read the whole thread, to long. Note i don't believe there should be an enforced rule but more of a guideline to people.

I do believe there should be some unwritten restrictions. Why? Because you should be giving 110% to that job or two you have taken on. Those that profess that they have no life and can do 4+ and give 110% to each one is just not true. In my opinion you shouldn't be satisfying each department by doing what you need to do. You should be concentrating on 1 or 2 and going above & beyond what is required.

Yes it is a fan site and you aren't getting paid but when i was staff member i would always try to exceed in the department i was in or managing because i Habbox and wanted to see it strive. No i wouldn't let it hinder my life but when i was working on something for Habbox i would give 110%.

I know when i was a manager, we weren't allowed to be (assistant) manager of another department. When i was a manager it was a fair amount of work. Managing staff, projects, PMs, emails and a lot more. Maybe some departments are easier than others but i am sure they are all a lot of work. Personally if you are a department manager i wouldn't recommend anyone to be apart of any other department.

I also believe that if a staff member has 4+ (even 3+) positions within Habbox they are taking away positions from potential new staff members who could provide more attention to that position that somebody with multiple positions can't

Now as always there are exceptions. For example being a part of the events department can easily be worked in with Habbox Live. Promoting the current events whilst on air etc etc.

I have never had more than one position at a time at Habbox. I may have overlapped here and there, when applying for a new department and resigning from a previous one (that is just smart). But in reality nobody should be exceeding 2+ and if you are then 3+ would be a no no in my book.

I appreciate all the staff at Habbox, you make it what it is.

2 cents.

[MKR&*42]

Then this isn't the thread for it. From what I can see this thread was created to try and put some rule to stop people having X amount of jobs then it turned about to a specific person because people in this thread agree that they don't deserve the amount of roles they have due to them not having time to do them all. Is this the right place to moan about them? No you do it the correct way.

Do we need to limit the jobs people have? No

Do we need to have words with people who can't manage those jobs? Yes but you don't start moaning about them in a feedback thread.

This^.

I'm sorry if anyone such as @Samanfa; feels offended by this thread. I didn't make it in order to target a specific person, and I had dire hope that no-one would start pointing fingers and naming names (hence why I didn't in my post). Samanfa was not the sole reason I made this thread, she isn't the only one with 4+ jobs. I had the issue floating around in my head for a few days so I decided to post it in feedback (After I noticed her gaining another job, but that's not the problem atm) and see what user's opinions were upon it. The thread is not "silly", it is simply a reasonable question which provoked a lot of debate.

I'm ashamed that people couldn't impress me and went on to name names really...

[CaptainAce]

I wasn't even targetting anyone either. As you say there are loads of people with 4+ Jobs. I didn't name anyone because theres quite a few people with that amount of jobs. People just assume I meant them :rolleyes:

[Kardan]

I wasn't even targetting anyone either. As you say there are loads of people with 4+ Jobs. I didn't name anyone because theres quite a few people with that amount of jobs. People just assume I meant them :rolleyes:

This is where you are wrong, there are 2 people on the forum with 4+ jobs.

@runeaddict99 with 5 (1 in a trial), and @Samanfa with 6, so all comments about people with 4+ jobs are about them, so you may not be targetting people directly, but it's obvious who you are talking about, and it's the same either way.

[MKR&*42]

This is where you are wrong, there are 2 people on the forum with 4+ jobs.

@runeaddict99 with 5 (1 in a trial), and @Samanfa with 6, so all comments about people with 4+ jobs are about them, so you may not be targetting people directly, but it's obvious who you are talking about, and it's the same either way.

Laura has 4+ jobs doesn't she? Or did she resign from some, I can't recall. She might be in 3 actually... I'm not even sure.

Or do you mean "over 4" jobs

[CaptainAce]

Dunno what Kardan meant but I meant 4 and over 4.

[Kardan]

Shush

[CaptainAce]

4+ is 4 and over.

[Kyle]

4+ is 4 and above otherwise it would be 5+

some mathematician you are lovepanda

Only problem I see here is a manager being heavily reliant on their assistant due to their countless other roles. No real need to actually cap the number of jobs but when it is QUITE CLEARLY affecting the output of the respective departments then it needs sorting out.