Protocols not being followed

[Grig]

Yeah I hated you when I promoted you ofc . Nah I joke, not only that you were the best for the job at the time sorry @Grig; you were another manager and I me being two managers either (plus I don't think you'd have taken it ).

Anyway yeah I agree with Laura, consider Jazz has helped do The Valentine's Vault with Logan, Habboxween Events with Jade, other things such as win a rooms you name it she's probably helped a lot more; she's been there longer than Jade and has seen it progress, Jade has her reasons to promote her and rightly do so. I still stand by my view on previous roles such as Nicola as opposed to Catzsy, and more. I'm sure we'll see an improvement in Habbox Live.

I, me! What is this SPAG!

Nah, if it's the best for a department I would always support it. I may argue over how some stuff are run, but at the end of the day I would always be supportive over such decisions.

It's better for HxL and for everyone in general. Habbox needs all the help it can get. Heck, I would even go as far as do external hiring into senior positions just to try and get some experience and knowledge on board as there isn't as much at present.

[GommeInc]

Do employers talk over promotions with all their staff in the real world? No. They should get the go ahead with AGMs (which we have to) and then MAYBE talk to other seniors (not necessary though).

Errr, yes? You pretty much answered that with your second sentence. So you sort of voided what you said without me needing to respond :/

[Richie]

Do employers talk over promotions with all their staff in the real world? No. They should get the go ahead with AGMs (which we have to) and then MAYBE talk to other seniors (not necessary though).

Then again they don't make someone executive manager after being a regular staff member for 4 days.

[lawrawrrr]

Errr, yes? You pretty much answered that with your second sentence. So you sort of voided what you said without me needing to respond :/

No I didn't? I said that managers should only need approval from the AGMs (aka the people above them) and the seniors if they did want some input, but they shouldn't be made to.

Then again they don't make someone executive manager after being a regular staff member for 4 days.

Then again they'll make people managers without working at that specific store before.

[Richie]

No I didn't? I said that managers should only need approval from the AGMs (aka the people above them) and the seniors if they did want some input, but they shouldn't be made to.



Then again they'll make people managers without working at that specific store before.

Which they have applications for..

Anyway I think I made my point, only time will tell.

[Chippiewill]

Do employers talk over promotions with all their staff in the real world? No. They should get the go ahead with AGMs (which we have to) and then MAYBE talk to other seniors (not necessary though).

Habbox chooses to be accountable to it's users, if it doesn't want input then they can scrap this forum, otherwise they have to be prepared for any **** heading their way.

[lawrawrrr]

Habbox chooses to be accountable to it's users, if it doesn't want input then they can scrap this forum, otherwise they have to be prepared for any **** heading their way.

I don't remember you consulting your staff about who should be senior even after 2 of us complained to you afterwards...

[Chippiewill]

I don't remember you consulting your staff about who should be senior even after 2 of us complained to you afterwards...

Didn't say it had to be checked in the open everytime, just that it's open to being questioned.

[lawrawrrr]

Didn't say it had to be checked in the open everytime, just that it's open to being questioned.

Yes but the post you replied to was about prior discussion about staff. Of course it's open to being questioned, but managers are well withing their right to refuse to answer why (exactly what you did I believe)

[Chippiewill]

Yes but the post you replied to was about prior discussion about staff. Of course it's open to being questioned, but managers are well withing their right to refuse to answer why (exactly what you did I believe)

I believe that I actually answered why so I'm not sure what point you're making.