hxhd snq questions

[LiquidLuck.]

it's going in circles because you're an idiot tbh.

you fail to acknowledge that you're completely wrong and every other person posting in the thread is still trying to tell you that you are.

Yeah because googling and then entering the answer is just as fast as someone who watched every film and read the book and knows the stuff off by heart... oh wait?

---------- Post added 24-11-2012 at 08:53 PM ----------



evidently not as you asked 2 questions regarding alcohol, I don't drink and know very little on the subject yet I never chose to complain about that did I?

don't be stupid, I know it's hard, but try.

Is Ethos the only way for you to get your opinion out? Insulting the person you don't agree with instead of the actions you don't agree with? Doesn't do it to be honest.
You have your opinion, I have mine. You think I'm wrong, I think you're just bothered you didn't win. Alex and Pyroka gave the Robert Pattinson answer faster than who had seen the movie, so there goes your theorie.

[Samantha]

Ethos again, so lovely. Even makes me want to comment on it more.
I am not even sure why I even bother since if you enter the HxHD after the SNQ, people will complain. It's Habbox..

You blame others but not yourself, you cannot admit that you could be wrong thus I have no time for you. If you can't take feedback don't reply? Maybe if you listened to some of the stuff said you'd understand what we were getting at.

---------- Post added 24-11-2012 at 09:04 PM ----------

Is Ethos the only way for you to get your opinion out? Insulting the person you don't agree with instead of the actions you don't agree with? Doesn't do it to be honest.
You have your opinion, I have mine. You think I'm wrong, I think you're just bothered you didn't win. Alex and Pyroka gave the Robert Pattinson answer faster than who had seen the movie, so there goes your theorie.

They probably gave it quick as @Alex3213; can type about 160 wpm? @RyRy; well it's Ryan so God knows how he got that quick though.
In all fairness I'd have thought the answer was Taylor Lautner or whatever it is.

[scottish]

Is Ethos the only way for you to get your opinion out? Insulting the person you don't agree with instead of the actions you don't agree with? Doesn't do it to be honest.
You have your opinion, I have mine. You think I'm wrong, I think you're just bothered you didn't win. Alex and Pyroka gave the Robert Pattinson answer faster than who had seen the movie, so there goes your theorie.

No, just seems you don't understand anything based on the fact you've done nothing but gone in circles throughout this thread, so instead of repeating those facts, *Removed*

Yes, they got one question of 4... lol?

Theory* just saying.

---------- Post added 24-11-2012 at 09:05 PM ----------
@Chris; can you enable my rep so i can -rep @liquidluck; then disable it again?

Edited by Jordan (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not be rude to other members

[dbgtz]

First I'd like to say that the target age group is 13+ so I don't see how it was silly since you can start drinking around that age and at least most people I know have. I actually thought about making it about daquiri, but didn't know if you knew it. Here we drink a lot of cuba libre, so I thought you would too.

Second, that's exactly my point. Like I said before why do you need to know so much about GK to win SNQ? This way always the same people will win, which I don't think it's fair. But for example the Robert Pattinson question, most people knew it and answered quickly. Also I had no idea the leaderboard would get so tight and no one would have more than 3 questions right before the last topic. Hasn't happened to me before.

Yes they might start drinking around 13+ but they're unlikely to know how to mix a cocktail or what colour that drink was.

Also general knowledge is what it says on the tin, general knowledge. It allows for questions to be provided which a variety of people may know, essentially creating a level playing field. The reason the same people win for the most part is probably to do with the fact no one actually knows the answer so they google it essentially turning SNQ into "who's got the fastest internet" with that cocktail question of yours being an example.

[buttons]

no matter the host or the questions you guys will always find something to moan about it's so annoying
fact is none of you complain during the quiz until the end when u haven't won
if u really want her to improve tell her why instead of just telling her SHE'S **** or a crap host, stop acting like 10 years olds

[scottish]

no matter the host or the questions you guys will always find something to moan about it's so annoying
fact is none of you complain during the quiz until the end when u haven't won
if u really want her to improve tell her why instead of just telling her SHE'S **** or a crap host, stop acting like 10 years olds

not really, if the quiz is based on GK i don't recall seeing a thread regarding it lately?

it's when people go with stupid crap like this people complain, i don't really care if i win or lose as I have vip until like end of next year but i'd prefer to see fair questions rather than some crap like this again.

because thats what the thread attempted to do for 6 pages and she failed to accept it, so the only solution is to say it how it is.

[Kyle]

It was established that there would be a few questions surrounding the release of the new twilight movie at the start of the quiz and the majority seemed content with that. There was a little confusion on a question about casablanca with people asking why a question was asked on such an archaic movie when it was supposedly established that the questions would be to do with a recent movie but people got over that and got on with the quiz.

Since this is a feedback thread I'll be constructive. Nobody really deserves to have an event they've taken time to organise and host picked apart quite so ruthlessly.

Personally, I didn't understand the question on forrest gump as we were told "pronunciation doesnt matter" which I took to mean spelling/grammar, so was a little confused when told that 'run forest run' wasn't sufficient but meh, English isn't her first language so I'll just assume that she meant something else by pronunciation.

The cuba libre question was one that clearly nobody knew and, considering past questions on cocktails haven't gone down well either, should be something that you should avoid in future. The absinthe question was fair though... most people guess colour questions before reading anyway.

General layout wasn't great . As previously stated, telling people the theme of the next question isn't something that works well in SNQ because it just causes a flood of pretyped answers that, if wrong, mean that the user has to scroll up and actually read the question before they can answer again and, if correct, means some people that may not deserve the point would get it over those that should have.

Having topics is good, just don't tell people about their specifics, simply allow them to fall under the 'general knowledge' umbrella, then nobody can complain. Typically there have been a mixture of GK and habbo(x) questions in the SNQ so I was quite shocked to find that you'd ditched the habbo(x) category completely too. Four questions on one topic isn't too many and, if spread out, you could have gotten away with them being unrelated. One about an actor that virtually everyone has heard of, one about an author that very many will at least know of and two specifically about the specific characters - which, IMO, is acceptable.

In future spread the topics out, include more habbo and steer clear of the drink.

If anybody feels they have been wronged or thinks that they should have won then you're more than welcome to a month of VIP from my account.

[Samantha]

It was established that there would be a few questions surrounding the release of the new twilight movie at the start of the quiz and the majority seemed content with that. There was a little confusion on a question about casablanca with people asking why a question was asked on such an archaic movie when it was supposedly established that the questions would be to do with a recent movie but people got over that and got on with the quiz.

Since this is a feedback thread I'll be constructive. Nobody really deserves to have an event they've taken time to organise and host picked apart quite so ruthlessly.

Personally, I didn't understand the question on forrest gump as we were told "pronunciation doesnt matter" which I took to mean spelling/grammar, so was a little confused when told that 'run forest run' wasn't sufficient but meh, English isn't her first language so I'll just assume that she meant something else by pronunciation.

The cuba libre question was one that clearly nobody knew and, considering past questions on cocktails haven't gone down well either, should be something that you should avoid in future. The absinthe question was fair though... most people guess colour questions before reading anyway.

General layout wasn't great . As previously stated, telling people the theme of the next question isn't something that works well in SNQ because it just causes a flood of pretyped answers that, if wrong, mean that the user has to scroll up and actually read the question before they can answer again and, if correct, means some people that may not deserve the point would get it over those that should have.

Having topics is good, just don't tell people about their specifics, simply allow them to fall under the 'general knowledge' umbrella, then nobody can complain. Typically there have been a mixture of GK and habbo(x) questions in the SNQ so I was quite shocked to find that you'd ditched the habbo(x) category completely too. Four questions on one topic isn't too many and, if spread out, you could have gotten away with them being unrelated. One about an actor that virtually everyone has heard of, one about an author that very many will at least know of and two specifically about the specific characters - which, IMO, is acceptable.

In future spread the topics out, include more habbo and steer clear of the drink.

If anybody feels they have been wronged or thinks that they should have won then you're more than welcome to a month of VIP from my account.

Ah that explains it I thought she meant punctuation, due to the spelling be something like 'poncuation' so yeah. I agree there should be Habbo(x) questions as if not why do it on Habbo for Habbox?

[FlyingJesus]

Do you people trying to complain actually know what the words you're using mean? It's not "biased" or "unfair" to have questions on a certain theme just because not everyone will know the answers - the entire point of quizzes is that not everyone knows all the answers. You're essentially complaining that you didn't have a response for some of the questions, which is just as stupid in this case as it would be if there were 4 totally random questions that weren't topics you know about.

It might be bad planning to have 1/5 questions based on one very small theme but it is not biased or unfair. Suck it up.

[buttons]

Making it exciting means you ask questions that they would all know. If only one person has watched twilight.. its clear who is going to win.

weirdest definition of 'exciting' i've ever heard.

Firstly, tricky questions? They could fit under General Knowledge which the quiz should mainly be about in most cases.
People got Monet pretty quickly though, they did pretype and it doesn't matter whether they pretyped correctly or not they could still do it.
Actually, a few people did think all the questions were Twilight based, if you were paying attention you'd have seen @RyRy; say I thought this was a film quiz and me agreeing with him.
No, they weren't pretty easy, I can't tell you who wrote it, I can't tell you who imprinted something on a daughter; they were pretty easy to YOU and a couple of others.

firstly you complain the other questions are too easy, then you complain the twilight ones are too hard? shouldn't it be that way? a mix easy, a mix hard. so what if people THOUGHT the questions were going to be all twilight based. it was clear from the quiz it wasn't and i did see her say it would only be 4, not seeing the problem here?

No it made it exciting to near enough 0 people (this is opinion not fact before you attempt to jump on that bandwagon) - it was one of the most boring SNQs I've been to and I've been to Oli's. Not everyone could win, the winner got what 5 points? Yet those on 0 couldn't have caught upto him with Twilight questions. Knowledge of MOVIES IN GENERAL can be seen as GK not Twilight.

you're telling her she doesn't know the difference between fact and opinion yet say it was exciting for no-one then say that in YOUR opinion it's exciting for no-one? think you're the one who doesn't understand fact and opinion. if not everyone could win, doesn't that make it more exciting? a quiz isn't supposed to be a quiz where only 2 or 3 same people are in the running to win...

4/20 leaving you with 16, you done two on another same topic, leaving you with 14. Wasted questions.
Exciting? Lol because answering 4 questions about twilight is really entertaining. Why not make another 4 on something else!!!

4 QUESTIONS. CRIME OF THE CENTURY. i'd understand if it was half, all this over 4/20 questions? you guys are ridiculous. no need to be so patronizing, if it was harry potter (something everyone knows), would there be complaints? nope. so why is there? im always seeing complains about liquidluck but the fact of the matter is she does this for you guys, she doesn't think "hey i'll do twilight cause everyone hates twilight" but nah, can't do right for wrong.

Cant lay the blame all on the managers though, you were the one who created the questions - therefore you should give a better variety of questions to your audience. They may of allowed them but you were the one who could of controlled the way the quiz went, you don't always need to be like "Oh ok managers accepted my questions, I'll leave it like that" because improvements can be made.

LOLOL could you grasp at straws anymore?! completely ridiculous, she made the questions and there apparently wasn't any problem with FOUR. QUESTIONS. on twilight. no matter what she did her questions on, it wouldn't be good enough for you guys. if she went and did the questions without being approved you'd complain at that but even though they were approved it's still not good enough? your argument is weak.

Plan so they didn't win? How can I even do that? I tried to make it a way so everyone could have a chance to win. Themed SNQs will bring those chances up as well. Also yes, I've seen in SNQ's people just saying ''oh it's always this question'', so I tried to do something different with the Drinks topic for example. I took time to get those questions, different sites, not only quiz-themes sites, looking for different drinks I could ask about etc. It wasn't done today.

everyone had a chance to win. the twilight people had a 4/20 chance of winning everyone else had the 16 other questions too. you did fine, don't let them bring you down.

You didn't plan well enough if you had to check the answer?

The topics were media based a lot of the time and then geography/history etc. where was the Habbo, Habbox questions? Stuff like that.

the one she checked was the spelling right? the stephenie meyer one? it's because no-one got the correct spelling so she rechecked just incase. if she didn't check, again, you guys would complain. complain themed is boring then complain she didn't stick to mostly habbo(x) questions, wouldn't that be boring too? there are only so much habbox questions you can ask..

A themed SNQ. Lol you'd do a better job creeping out papoy....

ha ha ha if all else fails result to personal insults you stole from someone else!!

They also don't have questions based on Twilight each week and now we see why.

OH MY GOD IT WAS ONE WEEK. ONE WEEK. FOUR QUESTIONS. fire immediately.

It wasn't spread you did them together; I believe @Maria; means have a TV question for #3 then one for #14 or something.

how would that make a difference

Next time, if there is one I suggest being more open to suggestions and admitting when you're wrong.

why should she, this is all to make her apologize? apologize for having 4 questions on twilight? good one.

Cool so you had variety in genre. But no one wants 4 questions on the same bloody topic which you so much enjoy, it's like me doing 4 questions on Resident evil or something - I Wouldn't do it because it's bound to cause something like it has already. UGH.

why are u so rude? like i say if it was harry potter no-one would have an issue....

But you wouldn't of had a single thought that it would end up like this? Hmm... And yes, it is something. 4 is too many, blah blah I've said it all before. We are just going around in circles, sigh. And actually no, for once I actually agree with people moaning about SnQ with these questions, because 4 on twilight is not fair. even with google.

err but other snqs ive had to use google for pretty much 18/20 questions or so so what's the big deal using google for 4?

Like I said before, why not make it a rule then? Or ask the SNQ host to send the questions to GM as well? That way like 5 people could have an opinion about it.

^^^ see. this is the way you guys should be debating. not throwing around personal insults. she's offering advice on how to improve it while you guys just insult her.

Managers may of not found it too much, but players did. Managers aren't always right.

er the people who make the rules (managers or w/e) are generally right....

5 people shouldn't have to have an opinion about it, you should ensure it's fair and if you need to get someone to do that for you then why host? The quiz isn't ever going to be completely fair and go without a hitch but you should really know 4 questions on a film YOU enjoy isn't going to do it for those who don't I'd have rather had seen 4 about recent films or something than just one [film].

she made sure it was fair by only having 4 questions and not anymore. again, if i did it on harry potter - something i enjoy, then there would most likely be no problems.

Ethos technique? Do I look like I really care if I'm doing that on an ONLINE FANSITE?

then why do u care so much about 4 questions on twilight on an ONLINE FANSITE (where many people will have watched/read the saga?)

if i've never took an interest in the book or the films, how the hell am i going to look up the author or each characters name IN the books or films...

use google like you did to win the other answers you got?

Second: Insulting me makes you happy? Go ahead, whatever makes you sleep better, as I just don't care what someone who doesn't even know me thinks about me. It's the way I sleep better as well. Win-win.

i like this the sooner people better realize, the happier they'll be. aint no better feeling knowing you don't give someone a second thought yet they're getting mad at you ahahah

Also I had no idea the leaderboard would get so tight and no one would have more than 3 questions right before the last topic. Hasn't happened to me before.

isn't that a good thing anyway?

You blame others but not yourself, you cannot admit that you could be wrong thus I have no time for you. If you can't take feedback don't reply? Maybe if you listened to some of the stuff said you'd understand what we were getting at.

she is taking feedback, she gave an idea such as showing to 5 people to see if she's doing it right. she's listening, she's answering in a good manner. same can't be said for the rest of you.

Since this is a feedback thread I'll be constructive. Nobody really deserves to have an event they've taken time to organise and host picked apart quite so ruthlessly.

agree. you should all boycott snq then see how they feel. agreed with all your post actually.


you guys are so ungrateful. go on about spam being the unfriendly bunch when it's always you habbo lot ganging up on each other, never grateful for what you're given. not everyone is going to know every topic so get the **** over it.