There are only limited people who can move at the moment, and they don't seem to be doing so
Oh made a revision on my earlier statement about losing in 2 goes, we can do it in 1 but it would mean getting Rosie killed

There are only limited people who can move at the moment, and they don't seem to be doing so
Oh made a revision on my earlier statement about losing in 2 goes, we can do it in 1 but it would mean getting Rosie killed
Last edited by FlyingJesus; 09-02-2013 at 08:34 PM.
`Fair nuff![]()
we may as well just give up hope on this task if we need everyone to be online
Yeah that's why I've been suggesting trying to lose with as few losses as possible, at least that way we gain something even if it isn't prize funds
I still think we could win the game handy enough. I think it may be easier to win the game rather than losing the game with as many pieces left as possible. Like to benefit from losing, we can only lose three more pieces, lose anymore than that and we might as well try and win.
What. We can lose by only losing one more piece (Rosie to E2), but if it gets dragged out we'll lose far more and still not win since 1) most people here can't play chess and 2) most people aren't even online to play if they could
ROSIE, DO THAT!!
ER WHY DID U BOLD SOMETHING
MOOOOOOLE
---------- Post added 09-02-2013 at 08:53 PM ----------
shing shing boom boom come on make a suma ting ting baby baby masalamama sheka me tidy any A SHINN SHING LA LA LO A BOOM BOOM ocme on come on shalalalala
pigged 25/08/2019
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!