****** threads

[Mr-Trainor]

Could you please prove to me that every song someone listened to in PWYLT was actually listened to by that person. Until then move it to spam

People are less likely to make that up. Yet again, it's just another case where you need to use some common sense.

[Aiden]

People are trying to argue that a thread about counting coco pops in your bowl, where people are just making it up, has a point.

its mean to call someone a liar geeeeez

[Mr-Trainor]

It doesn't have to be every person, even if one song was listened to by somebody else then that thread had a purpose.

If at least one of you fools counted your coco pops then get that thread moved back to discuss anything, but I would be surprised if even you would stoop that low and count your coco pops lol...

It still shouldn't though, you gain nothing from knowing how many coco pops are in a bowl. However, if these people are really interested in that then I'm sure they can find a YouTube video .

I've actually found the What are you listening to thread useful, if I see a song someone posts and I know the artist, I might go a look up that song to see if I like it. I did do that once .

[Grig]

Yeh some of these threads are pointless and I hate it when people post threads that they don't genuinely mean. I normally stick to the news section, so that's not really a problem, but have just seen what's the last book that you read thread. That annoyed me a bit because I'm NOT interested in that, I'm interested in if they read it what they think of it. A forum should be a place for discussion, which means interaction. But then again I'm not really that fussed as it doesn't affect the section I normally post in.

Although this forum has other problems, such as the completely broken reputation system.

[Chippiewill]

You didn't really win with the "Post Your" threads so why do you think it's going to be any different now?

Because I already did. Whether you admit it or not doesn't really affect me, but since quality was just enforced the point has already been conceded. What happens now is what's important, if you admit it then you get to enforce the rules as have been dictated in the FAQ and the forum returns to normality and we have some nice discussion. If you don't admit it then the forum continues like this for at least a little while until we all get bored or the forum closes from lack of active discussion.

[Aiden]

It still shouldn't though, you gain nothing from knowing how many coco pops are in a bowl. However, if these people are really interested in that then I'm sure they can find a YouTube video .

I've actually found the What are you listening to thread useful, if I see a song someone posts and I know the artist, I might go a look up that song to see if I like it. I did do that once .

knowing coco pops is useful to

you can see what the average is and if you should cut down js

[Mr-Trainor]

its mean to call someone a liar geeeeez

It's rude for saying people are stupid if they don't know how to use every function of complicated video editing software the first time they've tried it.

[Inseriousity.]

And now the point has finally been proven. Quality control is an aspect of Moderation. Now that we have determined that in fact quality should and IS enforced can we now have an actual discussion about the degree of enforcement.

Why don't you be more constructive then and start the actual discussion about where you think the line should be drawn? Perhaps then we can avoid the straw man argument that you have so far presented.

[Grig]

knowing coco pops is useful to

you can see what the average is and if you should cut down js

This has probably been the silliest reply that I've seen in a while.

[Aiden]

It's rude for saying people are stupid if they don't know how to use every function of complicated video editing software the first time they've tried it.

idc cuz i am rude, not gonna deny it