What do you want to happen to "fast threads"?

[AgnesIO]

I thought we had a vote on this a few months ago where members opted to keep the system as it was? why are we being asked to vote again EU-style (if i'm correct) over something that has already been decided and something that only a small group of forum members (who hardly post anything themselves) have a problem with?

If this goes through then i'm in half a mind to stop posting anything anymore (watch threads in Current Affairs dry up) apart from my monthly Debates quota - the few complaining about people posting threads can take over me and post the detailed discussion threads they want. SOMEHOW though, I don't have a feeling they will as they don't seem keen on doing it now - the best they can muster is piss take threads in discussion taking the mickey out of other threads other people have made. If those complaining put as much effort into posting interesting discussions as they posted complaining in the Feedback forum, then we wouldn't even be having this discussion.

Also I voted for the top one by mistake, so -1 and +1 onto the last option please.

Fairly sure the Current Affairs section is actually a UKIP section - you rarely post anything that isn't anti-Europe or pro UKIP. I don't think many will be missing that.

Also, some of the people asking for the change are amongst the highest posters on the forum? I think the problem is, last time people agreed on moving it, and then it was moved back (wasn't around when it was moved back so cannot comment). I thought you were always in favour of this sort of referendum style decision making - in which case, the ORIGINAL decision should never have been reversed.

Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

[Chippiewill]

It's actually pretty funny to call the BBC out on bias when the Current Affairs forum is a shining beacon of bias.

[buttons]

voting for let them continue just to annoy chippewill. if u constantly complain on an issue, people will do the opposite that u want them to

[-:Undertaker:-]

Why is it that the people complaining aren't the ones posting any detailed discussions themselves? do they expect the rest of us to do it for them, spoon feeding them like babies? well if this ridiculous change goes through I certainly won't be.

If it does pass, I look forward to the interesting threads that Kardan, Chippiewill and Marketing are going to be posting daily. I'm sure.

Fairly sure the Current Affairs section is actually a UKIP section - you rarely post anything that isn't anti-Europe or pro UKIP. I don't think many will be missing that.

You and a few others seem to post in them, so when i've stopped posting in that forum - that discussion will be lost.

Alternatively, if you think its too UKIP-Tory orientated then you are free to post anything else.. yet you don't.

Also, some of the people asking for the change are amongst the highest posters on the forum? I think the problem is, last time people agreed on moving it, and then it was moved back (wasn't around when it was moved back so cannot comment). I thought you were always in favour of this sort of referendum style decision making - in which case, the ORIGINAL decision should never have been reversed.

Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2

I'm in favour of letting people post what they want and if I don't like it then I DONT POST IN IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I mean Christ almighty, whats so hard to understand about that?

It's actually pretty funny to call the BBC out on bias when the Current Affairs forum is a shining beacon of bias.

I don't advocate impartiality. I mean, duh?

[Chippiewill]

If it does pass, I look forward to the interesting threads that Kardan, Chippiewill and Marketing are going to be posting daily. I'm sure.

Last time it happened people made threads automatically to fill the void.

[Mr-Trainor]

I agree with Dan @-:Undertaker:-; and tbh I don't even know why there is a poll regarding this. As I said in my last post, the rules deal with pointless threads fine and I think that nothing should be done. After all, how many more threads can these people make? They'll either grow up if they've been trying to prove a point, or run out of ideas / get bored eventually if they're just posting them for the fun of it.

[Yawn]

not every thread needs to be a full blown discussion :S

should leave it exactly as it is. i dont get why threads which dont promote discussion are being portrayed as negative not every1 wants to get into a discussion all the time and we can have threads that appeal to every1 then. having a sub forum for fast threads would be dumb and make everything far too messy. the ppl that r against fast threads aren't making slow threads (??? lol) anyway so the forum would entirely dry up and habbox would flop even harder

[Kardan]

I voted for 2 and 5. You either go one way or the other, you put these threads into a subforum with post count disabled, or you let them continue. Since we already tried option 2, and it got reverted because of low activity, the only real option is to let them continue.

Moderators should focus on pointless posting within the threads themselves rather than moving the whole thread.

[Yawn]

mr-trainers post on 2nd page summarises everything i wanted to say much better than i said it so look at this post. i think it is the perfect solution for the current skandair situation in which he is devaluing fast threads and he must be STOPPED b4 he ruins everything and we have another forum and everything is left a mess and rly boring

[lawrawrrr]

Can we a have another option?

Keep them where they are and move Chippiewill to his own sub-forum?