NHS Scotland control is devolved and for a lot of your issues, you're not "ruled by Westminster" compared to England who doesn't have any kind of devolved assembly so has Scottish/Welsh/NI MPs voting on matters that does not affect them.
I don't get the argument of not wanting to be under a certain governments ruling or "we didn't vote for this government" etc. You could grab the same sized chunk in lots of parts of the UK and say the same thing, but they don't argue for independence. The problem is to do with the FPTP voting system and this horrifically unbalanced devolution present.
I actually think you'll find Salmond is the one fear mongering as far as currency is concerned![]()
Well one reason is not sharing a land border with a foreign country really helps as far as defence is concerned and was arguably a small reason GB became a country in the first place.
Secondly, Scotland (and the rUK, don't get me wrong) are in much better economic positions in union, though there's a good chance Scotland would take a bigger blow as it's more reliant on exporting to the rUK than the rUK exports to Scotland though this is by far catastrophic.
Thirdly, there's a good chance a lot of Scottish based businesses will move their base of operations.
Finally, some would argue what the SNP are promising is quite unrealistic. For a while they've been greasing the entrance to independence with free prescriptions, free tuition fees etc. and they don't seem to be stopping with this. Scotland already has a much larger expenditure per head with declining oil revenues, meaning something is going to have to give way at some point and you'll be getting the treatment England is getting today.
Some of that might not make much sense but hey hum.







Reply With Quote







