Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 37 of 37
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    14,747
    Tokens
    55,541
    Habbo
    lawrawrrr

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Empired View Post
    wot
    are u sure
    I meant torture not pain in the second one really - or rather, what humans would call "horrific amounts of pain"





  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    England
    Posts
    7,427
    Tokens
    13,424
    Habbo
    Empired

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lawrawrrr View Post
    I meant torture not pain in the second one really - or rather, what humans would call "horrific amounts of pain"
    When you say you don't think animals have a concept of pain, what do you mean then? Psychological pain? Because if you ring a bell and then hit a dog, and repeat it enough times, you can ring the bell and the dog will cower and hide away because it's expecting the pain to follow. Is that not a concept of pain?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    14,747
    Tokens
    55,541
    Habbo
    lawrawrrr

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Empired View Post
    When you say you don't think animals have a concept of pain, what do you mean then? Psychological pain? Because if you ring a bell and then hit a dog, and repeat it enough times, you can ring the bell and the dog will cower and hide away because it's expecting the pain to follow. Is that not a concept of pain?
    I don't think they experience it in quite the same way that we do. It's hard to define even in humans really, because it combines physical and psychological elements. I don't think animals have those psychological elements - because they don't have the same capability for emotions in that way. Animals, in my view, can't feel distress and suffering, and although they can learn from mistakes/past pain, like the dog example you said, they can't form a real connection with it and their pain only extends to the current, rather than the lasting psychological pain. I'm not sure I'm saying what I mean very well though :/





  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    Narnia
    Posts
    1,298
    Tokens
    4,899
    Habbo
    Ripieno

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Animals can't agree to being tested on. I guess if it were to save many human lives, it would be beneficial but what gave us to potentially ruin/take the lives of other innocent creatures for our own?

    Is that not sort of selfish?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,726
    Tokens
    14,846

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Morally it is wrong that we do it but I think if anyone was given the choice that either they or an animal live, they would save them self every time. It's kind of the same thing, we test things on animals to save ourselves.

    It's the hierarchy of nature, a lion isn't going to starve itself to death in order to save a zebras life.
    Last edited by Alkaz; 19-11-2014 at 04:46 PM.


  6. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    9,905
    Tokens
    26,858
    Habbo
    Zak

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Hands down yes

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    974
    Tokens
    533
    Habbo
    MilksAreUs

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Personally I don't mind animals being tested on.
    Jump! For my love

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •