Should Habbox Forum change the Reputation Display System?

[Brad]

I don't care too much about my reputation on here.. it's just a number, and some green blocks.

[e5]

Good to see the opposition giving such firm arguments

There is no argument to have. It's something that needn't happen and will make no difference

[ItsMeerken]

i say change it, i like to see how much rep i have got at the end of the day and i dont understand this way atm

[Empired]

i say change it, i like to see how much rep i have got at the end of the day and i dont understand this way atm

This will not change how much YOU see, the change will be that OTHERS can see how much collective reputation you get for your individual posts.

What don't you understand? I'm sure someone could explain for you

[FlyingJesus]

There is no argument to have. It's something that needn't happen and will make no difference

Clearly it would make a difference or there wouldn't be the strong reasoned arguments for changing it. You've already proven that you're incapable of actually reading the proposal so you're a lost cause (as with most things) but do at least try to respond with a real answer - or if you think it will truly make no difference at all, don't block it for those of us who do get affected by people - especially upper management - making disparaging comments at our expense and being rewarded for it

i say change it, i like to see how much rep i have got at the end of the day and i dont understand this way atm

Thanks for the supporting vote but this change will only affect what's shown on the post itself, for example a green +2 in the bottom left corner when 2 people have +repped it. Under the proposed changes, someone -repping that post would make the number in green change to just +1, in order to make potentially problematic posts not look like they're massively supported when they're not

[e5]

Clearly it would make a difference or there wouldn't be the strong reasoned arguments for changing it. You've already proven that you're incapable of actually reading the proposal so you're a lost cause (as with most things) but do at least try to respond with a real answer - or if you think it will truly make no difference at all, don't block it for those of us who do get affected by people - especially upper management - making disparaging comments at our expense and being rewarded for it



Thanks for the supporting vote but this change will only affect what's shown on the post itself, for example a green +2 in the bottom left corner when 2 people have +repped it. Under the proposed changes, someone -repping that post would make the number in green change to just +1, in order to make potentially problematic posts not look like they're massively supported when they're not

It it seems anyone who is against your opinion gets fired upon. I'm perfectly entitled to my opinion as you are and more then capable of reading. My reply in the other thread made perfeg sense - I don't think negative reps should be shown/deductive or whatever on the forum what so ever. That's my OPINION (which I am entitled to with being shot down).

Personally i I think it just confuses how many +reps a user has actually receives when a -rep takes it down... I'd rather just know how many positive reps a post receives rather than wondering of that's a true amount as they may be been -repped.

[scottish]

It it seems anyone who is against your opinion gets fired upon. I'm perfectly entitled to my opinion as you are and more then capable of reading. My reply in the other thread made perfeg sense - I don't think negative reps should be shown/deductive or whatever on the forum what so ever. That's my OPINION (which I am entitled to with being shot down).

Personally i I think it just confuses how many +reps a user has actually receives when a -rep takes it down... I'd rather just know how many positive reps a post receives rather than wondering of that's a true amount as they may be been -repped.

No-one said your other reply didn't made perfeg sense, the point is it shows you either don't know how to read, or didn't read the thread before replying as your point was completely null.

How would it confuse you, you're a big boy I'm sure (well, I'm not sure, I'd like to hope so though) you're capable of reading how many +reps you received in your UserCP. Even then it's not confusing anyone, it's giving a proper representation of how the forum viewed a specific post.

Fail to see how anyone can be confused with it lol :S

[e5]

No-one said your other reply didn't made perfeg sense, the point is it shows you either don't know how to read, or didn't read the thread before replying as your point was completely null.

How would it confuse you, you're a big boy I'm sure (well, I'm not sure, I'd like to hope so though) you're capable of reading how many +reps you received in your UserCP. Even then it's not confusing anyone, it's giving a proper representation of how the forum viewed a specific post.

Fail to see how anyone can be confused with it lol :S

Im talking about seeing others peoples posts. Such as roboevils post with loads of rep, if he got some negatives for whatever reason on that post, it wouldn't be a true reflection of how many +reps he actually got and I like to see that sort of thing. So enough with your silly sarcastic comments, and understand what I'm saying before chirping on.

[scottish]

Im talking about seeing others peoples posts. Such as roboevils post with loads of rep, if he got some negatives for whatever reason on that post, it wouldn't be a true reflection of how many +reps he actually got and I like to see that sort of thing. So enough with your silly sarcastic comments, and understand what I'm saying before chirping on.

Instead it would be a true reflection of the forums view of his post, not only the positive and hiding the negative reputation..

For example if someone was to insult you and get like 10 -reps from staff, then 30 +reps from the community, 20 would be an accurate reflection of the forums view on that post, 30 would not.

[Shar]

I am not bothered either way