
The mean average for 3 days of last week@Wispur may I ask what the maths was to decide on 478 posts per day?![]()
Former General Manager
Former Forum Manager
Former Site Manager
I've left, but I still visit sometimes!
should have done the week before that
or the average of 3 days last week and 3 days week prior
as everyone was posting to get 100 posts last week
also what's this that only the top people will be getting vip for weekly posting stats? @Phil;
the one week the system is actually working and encouraging people to post to get the vip you're going to change it and remove it?
I did think thisshould have done the week before that
or the average of 3 days last week and 3 days week prior
as everyone was posting to get 100 posts last week
also what's this that only the top people will be getting vip for weekly posting stats? @Phil;
the one week the system is actually working and encouraging people to post to get the vip you're going to change it and remove it?100 post pact mk2?
![]()
Everyone should be posting to get 100 posts every weekshould have done the week before that
or the average of 3 days last week and 3 days week prior
as everyone was posting to get 100 posts last week
also what's this that only the top people will be getting vip for weekly posting stats? @Phil;
the one week the system is actually working and encouraging people to post to get the vip you're going to change it and remove it?
Yeah I'm going to have to do some sort of cut off or I'll br giving out likr 4-5 months of VIP every week which can't happen. This is to stop people reaching 100 posts in the first few days and then give up posting, this way there will be a bit of competition.
So the first week the system has worked to actually increase posting you want to basically remove it?Everyone should be posting to get 100 posts every week
Yeah I'm going to have to do some sort of cut off or I'll br giving out likr 4-5 months of VIP every week which can't happen. This is to stop people reaching 100 posts in the first few days and then give up posting, this way there will be a bit of competition.
Obviously if people made a pact to post 100 times then it'll boost forum activity, this isn't going to happen every single week.
I'm pretty sure at this point last week a few people had 100 posts already, now everyone's at a fraction of that.
What worked this week was a number of people made a pact to post 100 times and it worked. Scott you are the very person that has before said that too much VIP is getting handed out and now you are against it?So the first week the system has worked to actually increase posting you want to basically remove it?
Obviously if people made a pact to post 100 times then it'll boost forum activity, this isn't going to happen every single week.
I'm pretty sure at this point last week a few people had 100 posts already, now everyone's at a fraction of that.
I'm not against it, if it proves to be consistent.
If they make a pact one week then 20 weeks after that they don't, then I don't see the need to urgently change it.
If over say 4 consecutive weeks it happens and you're giving out 5 months of VIP per week fair enough, but not the first time it happens, especially when everyone knows they posts were made as part of a pact.
Okay well I'll leave it for this week and see how we get on but I am going to be adding something for the Top Poster.I'm not against it, if it proves to be consistent.
If they make a pact one week then 20 weeks after that they don't, then I don't see the need to urgently change it.
If over say 4 consecutive weeks it happens and you're giving out 5 months of VIP per week fair enough, but not the first time it happens, especially when everyone knows they posts were made as part of a pact.
Get graphics to make some icon and the top poster will get it for a week.
A trophy or something would do.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!