So you think we should all have the freedom to go out and stab, kill and rape people, for the uk to be considered a free country? Which in real terms isnt much different to what smoking in public places is actually doing... Killing people.
Its a MUCH greater violation of someones freedom to kill them, than it is to prevent them from killing others.
Not really, air is in a habbit of moveing around, a sign above a certain area really doesnt have much effect on stoping the smoke wofting everywhere anyway.One thing that I don't agree with, is smoking in a pub/restaurant when people are eating which is fair enough, however before the ban, places had designated areas for smokers which worked fine.
Although personally im not fully in agreement with the Ban, as i think it goes to far. I think it should be up to the Owner of the resterant to choose weather or not they wish to permit smokeing, then if people want to smoke when they eat, go on a place that allows it, if people want to avoide smoke, go to a place that doesnt. which to me makes alot more sence and puts more freedom in the hands of people rather than the nanny state.
Actually i expect quite the oppersit, when you consider upwards of 60% of the NHS's is to do with smokers, if the number of smokers goes down, so will the costs of running the NHS which will result in much less tax "/people will soon begin to realise that the ban is annoying when their taxes goes up. I can't wait for that.



















