
They still sell the old ones though.It's bloody nasty!
I thought things were supposed to go forward, what the hell happens if you break your headphones? You can't just use a normal pair, you have to go and buy a new pair of these Apple ones.
I think its a step in the wrong direction. Ok yeah, smaller is better but I think they have went a bit far with all the shrinking.
+ It's all about business, of course Apple knows if your headphones break you will need to buy a new pair from them. Business is all about making money $$$, does nobody know that?
That went fast.
- The new shuffle is damn attractive.
- £19 is not an extortionate amount for new Apple headphones with remote. (Though £54 for their in-ear variety is.)
- The shuffle uses a 3.5mm jack, so I gather you don't need to use their headphones. I imagine you could use any that have controls on them. In fact, I'll test this out on Thursday afternoon or Friday when I'm next near the Apple store.
- Did I imagine how attractive the shuffle is?
- I really would buy one but my new phone has more than adequate music support, and my tablet didn't pay for itself.
- Lists rule.
Yeah, of course it is all about the money but what I meant was really you can't use your product until you get another pair of Apple headphones.
Any other player you would just bash another pair of headphones in and you could be listening to your music again no problem.
I think the previous generation looked better though, although I am loving that it is 4GB![]()
As I have said, you might not need Apple headphones... just any headphones with controls on them. If Apple were going to make them proprietary, they could have used a custom-size jack. I will go testing tomorrow afternoon.Yeah, of course it is all about the money but what I meant was really you can't use your product until you get another pair of Apple headphones.
Any other player you would just bash another pair of headphones in and you could be listening to your music again no problem.
I think the previous generation looked better though, although I am loving that it is 4GB
It'd work but you couldnt control it unless it had the 3rd Jack.. that is if Apple haven't changed the order round.
- The new shuffle is damn attractive.
- £19 is not an extortionate amount for new Apple headphones with remote. (Though £54 for their in-ear variety is.)
- The shuffle uses a 3.5mm jack, so I gather you don't need to use their headphones. I imagine you could use any that have controls on them. In fact, I'll test this out on Thursday afternoon or Friday when I'm next near the Apple store.
- Did I imagine how attractive the shuffle is?
- I really would buy one but my new phone has more than adequate music support, and my tablet didn't pay for itself.
- Lists rule.
Last edited by Recursion; 11-03-2009 at 07:28 PM.
Every set of earbuds has 3 connectors... it's the extra 4th connector which is necessary and yes, I have it. Nokia headset with 3.5mm, 4 connectors, FF, RE, Stop, Play/Pause, and volume rocker. I'll drop a note in this thread when I've tried it out.
I actually like it, I think it looks very nice, simple. Most people dont understand that simplicity is what people love about Apple's music products.
Dont know about functionality though, going to the Apple store over the weekend so I will take a look, might pick one up.
y'wha?
Much like Steve Jobs penis then xP
It's quite an interesting idea though, it reminds me of the old iPod Mini, the only iPod I ever liked
There's a right way and a wrong way of doing that though, people are going to complain about it being unethical now :/
Last edited by GommeInc; 12-03-2009 at 01:13 AM.
LEFT
FOM & FOW
If you need me, feel free to PM me here for contact details.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!