Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 55
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    7,177
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I think the fact he gave full infractions is a little harsh. When people post off topic when I moderate - I edit the post and usually PM the user manually, if they continue, I simply issue a warning and after that infractions.

    However, I have to disagree with the fact you say they aren't off topic, as they clearly are...
    Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    4,812
    Tokens
    46

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joshua View Post
    That quote isn't against any rules
    If you can get this Alan person to tell us that he gives you permission to post that chatlog it is not against the rules. However if he does not, it is against the rules as, as far as we know, he has not given his consent.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    10,922
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ymo View Post
    If you can get this Alan person to tell us that he gives you permission to post that chatlog it is not against the rules. However if he does not, it is against the rules as, as far as we know, he has not given his consent.
    Alan = Baving

    So does this mean I can't post a conversation I had on MSN with George Bush?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    6,171
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nixt View Post
    I think the fact he gave full infractions is a little harsh. When people post off topic when I moderate - I edit the post and usually PM the user manually, if they continue, I simply issue a warning and after that infractions.

    However, I have to disagree with the fact you say they aren't off topic, as they clearly are...
    If all mods would do that, people will get away with this way too much, hence why some infractions have a warning option for the first time they break that rule.

    Quote Originally Posted by darkchicken101 View Post
    I agree with the OP. I got an "off-topic" infraction because I said a word which was filtered, and it was the only word in my post.

    It was LMAO with an F in the middle. Damn trialists.
    Saying that isn't allowed, but you shouldn't have had an infraction for posting off-topic but for avoiding the filter/ inappropriate language.

    Quote Originally Posted by joshua View Post
    That quote isn't against any rules, I suggest you learn the rules if you're planning on passing the trial; actually, don't worry! I'm sure you'll get past with your great reputation of a trustworthy person!

    Anyhow, again you've just came back and said "they were breaking a rule", I'm not disputing that they didn't break a rule; I'm saying moderators shouldn't attack users with infractions who dare to slightly post "off-topic". Seriously, at the rate you're going everyone will have lost their first Habbox account and will be using one without any posts/rep ETC. which they don't care about. How do you seriously expect to punish people if all you can do is ban their accounts they don't care about? You are digging Habbox's grave, as well as ruining Habbox users' experience on the forum at the same time.
    Mods can't ban people if that's waht you were saying.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ymo View Post
    I also suggest that if you wish to complain about what I have done before, or just to have a dig at me, please take it elsewhere to management.
    It's not against the rules if both parties agree with it being posted.

    I think most people are over-reacting, it's not that hard to stay on-topic. Most people avoid getting an infraction by posting things like:
    Off topic: Bla bla bla
    On topic: Bla bla bla
    Or something like
    Bla bla off-topic bla bla
    But to stay on-topic, bla bla
    [CENTER]Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    2,688
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ymo View Post
    If you can get this Alan person to tell us that he gives you permission to post that chatlog it is not against the rules. However if he does not, it is against the rules as, as far as we know, he has not given his consent.
    I do give me consent. Btw I think I know what breaks the rules etc.. I have been there done that.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    7,177
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by micky.blue.eyes View Post
    If all mods would do that, people will get away with this way too much, hence why some infractions have a warning option for the first time they break that rule.
    Actually I think it's better that way. I only do it for minor offences though .
    Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    4,812
    Tokens
    46

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by micky.blue.eyes View Post
    It's not against the rules if both parties agree with it being posted.
    I have stated this.

    Quote Originally Posted by Baving
    Btw I think I know what breaks the rules etc.. I have been there done that.
    I do not believe that I have questioned that?

    I suggest that, if you wish to take this further, you PM senior management to deal with the issue that you have raised.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    6,171
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ymo View Post
    I have stated this.
    Lol yea, I was still busy with my post when you posted that.



    But I don't think problems between mods and other members will ever be solved, so there will be many more of these threads without any solutions.
    [CENTER]Time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    bristol
    Posts
    3,799
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I would say blatant off-topic posting does qualify for an infraction, however someone just replying to something mentioned within the thread but is irrelevant to the thread's subject doesn't. I'm sure everyone of you have done it at least 20 times, luckily for you moderators' weren't always this strict and you're not permanently banned. Fine, ask them nicely not to, but giving an infraction for it is just harsh.

    Quote Originally Posted by micky.blue.eyes View Post
    Mods can't ban people if that's waht you were saying.
    I'm fully aware who can ban people who and who cannot, seeing as I once could ban people myself. I was suggesting that after a while the infractions will accumulate, and therefore the user will be banned. I didn't think that needed any explanation, but it obviously did.
    kinda quit.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    4,514
    Tokens
    1,832

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I kinda agree abit :S.. I once got warned for saying something which was quite on topic imo, but yet I was told.. Dont post off-topic.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •