Is this allowed?

[The Professor]

That paragraph seems to be in agreement :S There's no point opening the can of worms when the current system is working at it's best.

Maybe I misunderstood your point then, maybe I am in agreement and don't know it

[nvrspk4]

-rep

Isn't it only bad if the "avoidance" is literally avoiding the spelling? It's bad when it's something like phuck, because it sounds exactly the same as the word it is avoiding. But frig, frick and frack are popular yet amusing avoidances which look stupid and are meant for humourous reasons - would you really take anyone serious using that language? I wouldn't.

I disagree with Professor-Alex, that's just begging another uproar of the forum becoming bland, boring and over-ruled. By all means, ban the avoidance of words that are pronounced exactly the same e.g. phuck and to some extent shet, because it is obviously intended to cause an argument, but frig, frigate, frick, frack, sheet, are perfectly fine and can not be used in an argument, without the user of the words being laughed at. Heck, if they use that language, tell me and I'll humilate the little beggars (<- that would also be banned, as it clearly means something else :rolleyes

Sorry I was thinking about two things at once, I meant the below VVVV

I do not see 'Frack off' as avoidance if the word is acceptable, as it has been confirmed' but it could break other rules such as rudeness to others/inappropriate if used aggressively and in an argumentative way.