How does anyone know if they're gay etc...

[liquid]

enjoying the sex is nothing to do with it.

[CJW93]

Havn't tried either but im not going to have sex with a boy thats just plain wrong imo

[lew!]

I could say being straight is plain wrong. Its opinions tbh.


Im like 70% gay and like 30% lol.. Im bi but i prefer bein gay. and im probberly a little camp.. NO I DONT HAVE THE ANNOYING VOICE..! but i like singing.. dancing.. good fashion sense LOL

[Mentor]

Well, this girl said to me once (not directly but to person next to me) 'How does anyone know if they're gay if they've never tried it?' then she started saying how she would consider having sex with a girl to see if she liked it or not.

I mean shes completly right.

Im gona disagree and say thats stupid, within the limits of bicuriousy and the general norms with sexually in a given society, telling if your preference is towards men or women doesnt requre you to have sex with both.

I could ask, how do you know you dont want to have sex with goats?
From the above your answer would have to be, you need to try having sex with a goat to find out.

To a normal person though, im pretty sure its quite easy to tell weather you find a goat sexually attractive or not and thus determine that you probably wouldn't want to have sex with it. The same is true with both men and women, straight people find those of the oppersit sex, sexually appealing. And those of the same sex, not sexually appealing. Because of this its quite easy for them to tell, theyed rather have sex with the oppesit sex than the same sex. Homosexuals tell in pretty much the same way, the same sex is attractive, the oppesit sex is not attractive.

Normal people REALLY dont need to **** everything that moves... or even some stuff that doesnt, just to be able to tell if they want to have sex with it or not...
Although, maybe im wrong? maybe you do need to **** every animal in the zoo to find out weather you like it or not? But im reasonbly sure that isnt the case for the great majorty of humans.

[WarezKid]

Im gona disagree and say thats stupid, within the limits of bicuriousy and the general norms with sexually in a given society, telling if your preference is towards men or women doesnt requre you to have sex with both.

I could ask, how do you know you dont want to have sex with goats?
From the above your answer would have to be, you need to try having sex with a goat to find out.

To a normal person though, im pretty sure its quite easy to tell weather you find a goat sexually attractive or not and thus determine that you probably wouldn't want to have sex with it. The same is true with both men and women, straight people find those of the oppersit sex, sexually appealing. And those of the same sex, not sexually appealing. Because of this its quite easy for them to tell, theyed rather have sex with the oppesit sex than the same sex. Homosexuals tell in pretty much the same way, the same sex is attractive, the oppesit sex is not attractive.

Normal people REALLY dont need to **** everything that moves... or even some stuff that doesnt, just to be able to tell if they want to have sex with it or not...
Although, maybe im wrong? maybe you do need to **** every animal in the zoo to find out weather you like it or not? But im reasonbly sure that isnt the case for the great majorty of humans.

Good points, but we dont really need to know about the goat part


Funny as well, REP+

[Frisky]

Some people just go over the top to prove people wrong

I mean.. who ***** goats anyway? When was a goat involved? Any sain person would know I was talking about HUMANS. y'know.. those things? Might not see many of them in ur life xx

[Mentor]

Some people just go over the top to prove people wrong

I mean.. who ***** goats anyway?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4748292.stm

When was a goat involved? Any sain person would know I was talking about HUMANS. y'know.. those things? Might not see many of them in ur life xx

Where talking about human sexualty, human sexualty is a very broad spectrum, chances are theres at least some people in to anything. From car (in a sexual way) to goats, food or what ever else.

If your saying you can tell if you find somthing sexually attractive without haveing sex with it, assumeing you havent ****** your toaster your obviously dont know if you find it sexuallty attractive.

I assumed the goats example was obvious enough for everyone, but it appears not for you. You havent tryed ******* a goat (i hope) so HOW can you know weather or not you want to have sex with one? People/goats makes no difference on this issue.

I assumed like a normal person the fact you probably wouldn't want to **** a goat would be quite apparent, thus u could see you can very easily tell if you find somthing, human or not, sexually attractive. To me, men and goats both look equally unattractive, which leads me to the assumption im probabaly not gay. But since you lack the ability to tell via this method which most humans seem to have a grasp on, i pitty any zoo you happen to visit...

[Frisky]

Lmmfaaao at you
I knew you'd waste your time replying some huge paragraph..

Pathetic Habboxians.

[Charlie]

I'd say you'd find someone sexually attractive if you looked at them or thought about them in a way that turned you on or whatever.

Therefore, I know I am gay because I thought about it, and I know that thinking about guys that way doesn't do anything for me, whereas for the same sex, it's different. Having sex with someone doesn't prove that your sexually attracted to that sex because you'd need to like the person to like the sex in a way to know that you enjoyed it. Having sex with someone of the same sex doesn't prove anything.

[Frisky]

Yeah, I realised that like on page 1. I think I said something about it also...? I have no idea.
anyway, yeah i get what your saying rawries ^_^