Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 84
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2,222
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adzeh View Post
    Not a personal attack on anybody here.

    If I became General Manager I would have imposed auto bans on anybody who could not be positive on this forum. It is your opinion which cannot be doubted or questionned, but if that opinion is posted and will cause more negativity then it has to be dealt with.

    Extreme example of this is slander, which is (I believe) regarded as a criminal offence?

    Basically, I would have no problem with banning anybody that set out to impose their negative opinions on others, with the intention of influencing the opinions of others.
    I think your right banning somebody who is always negative is a great thing to do. Maybe read undertakers posts and see if they are ALL negative though? I find quite a number of his posts as positive but it does vary depending on the subject and its the same with us all.
    Do we start telling people what threads we can and cant post in? If we all had the same opinion and agreed on anything they might as well shut up shop now? maybe hxf will have to add a hack to turn its members into zombies and have the power to control our minds so we agree 100% with everything.

  2. #32

    Default

    The idea of it is to simplify the forum and give more power to the users, it will then include the users in the decision making. It looks confusing written down but once it was up it would be rather simple.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,624
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    "Include members in decision making" Yeah, good idea. Placing that on habbox is something that will never happen.
    Joined Habbox for the first time on the 29-10-2005 // Joined Habbox for the second time on the 08-10-2006 // Joined Habbox for the third time on the 30-09-2007 // Became a Habbox Writer on the 26-11-2007 // Became a Senior Habbox Writer on the 07-02-2008 // Left Habbox 01-07-2008 // Came back to habbox on 23-08-2008 // Became a Writer again on the 27-08-2008 // Became a Trialist Content Designer on the 22-09-08 // Left Habbox on the 30-09-08

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    17,006
    Tokens
    26,134
    Habbo
    e5

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by danandthe3gifts View Post

    My opinion was negative yes, yet the question still remains why have I been banned which according to your rules states will never happen.

    It says there I can say what I want as long as I don't call anyone names, which last night - I didn't. The reason you gave for banning -:undertaker:- was for being 'negative'. Isn't that the whole point of a forum? A forum is where different ideas and people will talk/debate/discuss what they think. I have had a reasonably clean record, I wonder if Immenseman is going to be banned for being too 'positive' in the ione Gifts thread. Surely if you feel they aren't super rares, you should be able to defend your reasons? - or are you the spineless cowards you seem to act like?

    I don't want this moved thanks, like my last thread a few weeks ago was ignored. If you look in the spam thread about my ban, you will see even people who didn't always agree with me still think it's pathetic, yet again it seems like you are outnumbered? - Are you going to ban them for being to negative about your rules?
    The new rule was put in when Sierk made an announcement, it just wasn't updated in the rules obviously.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,624
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Then it should have been. Plus his posts arent only bad and he doesn't purposely try to make trouble so the ban is unfair
    Joined Habbox for the first time on the 29-10-2005 // Joined Habbox for the second time on the 08-10-2006 // Joined Habbox for the third time on the 30-09-2007 // Became a Habbox Writer on the 26-11-2007 // Became a Senior Habbox Writer on the 07-02-2008 // Left Habbox 01-07-2008 // Came back to habbox on 23-08-2008 // Became a Writer again on the 27-08-2008 // Became a Trialist Content Designer on the 22-09-08 // Left Habbox on the 30-09-08

  6. #36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by e5 View Post
    The new rule was put in when Sierk made an announcement, it just wasn't updated in the rules obviously.
    1. It should of been put in the banning thread then.
    2. I do post positively.
    3. I am not here to cause trouble, infact I want the opposite and that's for the forum to improve.
    4. Yesterday I was banned because a an issue that Management seem to cringe over.
    5. I can think the ione Gifts are super rares if I wish, and management can't make me think otherwise.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2,222
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nakumuri View Post
    Then it should have been. Plus his posts arent only bad and he doesn't purposely try to make trouble so the ban is unfair
    +Rep :eusa_clap

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,624
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    You seem so sarcastic. I don't see why dan was even banned. it's an opinion. Everyone in entitled to theirs.
    Joined Habbox for the first time on the 29-10-2005 // Joined Habbox for the second time on the 08-10-2006 // Joined Habbox for the third time on the 30-09-2007 // Became a Habbox Writer on the 26-11-2007 // Became a Senior Habbox Writer on the 07-02-2008 // Left Habbox 01-07-2008 // Came back to habbox on 23-08-2008 // Became a Writer again on the 27-08-2008 // Became a Trialist Content Designer on the 22-09-08 // Left Habbox on the 30-09-08

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    2,222
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nakumuri View Post
    You seem so sarcastic. I don't see why dan was even banned. it's an opinion. Everyone in entitled to theirs.
    Who you on about? I + Repped you because I agree with you 100% :s

    I can be sarcastic to people who attack me first but I dont even know you :s

    This situation is like the person doing the ban taking their ball back down the park because things are not going their way.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,624
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Sorry lol, I don't usually receive +rep and to me my post sounded like it was pointing out the obvious. Thanks for the rep .
    Joined Habbox for the first time on the 29-10-2005 // Joined Habbox for the second time on the 08-10-2006 // Joined Habbox for the third time on the 30-09-2007 // Became a Habbox Writer on the 26-11-2007 // Became a Senior Habbox Writer on the 07-02-2008 // Left Habbox 01-07-2008 // Came back to habbox on 23-08-2008 // Became a Writer again on the 27-08-2008 // Became a Trialist Content Designer on the 22-09-08 // Left Habbox on the 30-09-08

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •