I DIDN'T RUIN ITIt was just a bad example
![]()
Cars handle differently, indeed, but they do the same business which is where the example drives off into a hedgeA Vauxhall has a different gearbox than a Ford car, reverse is where 6th Gear is while in a Vauxhall you pull up on the gear stick (or down) to go into reverse
He doesn't have to have a Mac or use one everyday to know how they work, they do what every other computer does and are made from the same components, the only major difference is the GUI and specifically the OS
Of course you're not stupid enough, you're managing fine typing on a magic light box and don't appear to have to stop every few seconds to remember how to breatheOriginally Posted by HotelUser
Though speaking of which, Macs still cost alot in any country. Tech stuff here maybe expensive, but in the US an iMac is still alot more than a PC, so changing the country doesn't really do much, prices are cheaper, but prices are cheaper across the board, not just for Apple gear :/ And what you said is common sense, programs designed for OS X won't work on a Windows machine, I don't see why you typed that, it's like saying a USB cable won't go in a 3-pin socket or aa Wii game won't work on a PS3...
I never said I was an expert, don't put words in my mouth just because you can't think of a good come back :rolleyes: If a Mac can't have something plugged in and "JUST WORK", then they're terrible machines and the Apple marketing ploy fails. At least a cheap, Acer laptop running XP can get plugged into a projector and "JUST WORK". I know what I was doing, you just plug it in and it should "JUST WORK", but it didn't, the quality was terrible and the settings for the projector made no difference, but it was so long ago that changing the settings seems irrelevant, it should either just work, or not work at all, it worked, but the colour should not lack the red spectrum, nor should the "plug and play crap" not understand itself :rolleyes:Originally Posted by HotelUser
Again, you do this typical ploy to divert away from the central argument (which suggests you agree their adverts suck) :/ Their adverts are crap, so why are you suggesting on having an Apple Adverts versus Microsoft and their crazy lawsuits and copyright schemes argument? Both cannot be compared, so a pointless discussion trying to divert away from the central argument to be fair :/Originally Posted by HotelUser
And this is where you fail your argument, saying I apparently have to waste my money to actually make an argument. I've used them briefly on countless times, but according to your barmy logic "this is not enough" and you claw away at this pretending this is where I have no clue... Your only claim to making a point, let's face it, on a simple argument, is that you attempt to deny with this "I owns one, I is better than you attitude", which is quite patheticOriginally Posted by HotelUser
If a Mac, a machine that only comes from one company, cannot do one simple task, then they are crap. If OS X was like Windows, an OS installed on hundreds of different machines by different companies using difference hardware, then I'd agree -but no a Mac only comes in one form from one company, if Apple failed with one machine then it doesn't bode well with the others, especially when this "plug and play crap" is meant to "just work", which it doesn't. Whoever invented these rediculous adapters in a ploy to make more money in poor workmanship probably needs a punch in the face - a projector should just plug in and work, not plug into something, oh wait, you need to buy one, then plug into the machine and not work properly.
And again, wild assumptions that are apparently down to me, and not a crappy machineAgain, I point you to the "JUST WORK" slogan Apple falsely plant on their machines. It should "just work", and I know how to plug and projector into a laptop or any sort of machine, it's just a shame the OS and the machine is so crap it can't even work properly. So glad it didn't have to be plugged into the sound system, I'd hate to hear what mess would come out of it :rolleyes:
And I can't believe you based your conclusion on a post containing generic slobber, Jord![]()



It was just a bad example

.


