Should Habbox Forum change the Reputation Display System?

[Alkaz]

I voted no. I can see the reasoning behind changing it but I don't think that it makes sense to change it.

[The Don]

I voted yes because the change does make sense but I won't be upset if it doesn't happen.

[Kyle]

I voted no. I can see the reasoning behind changing it but I don't think that it makes sense to change it.

>can see the reasoning
>doesn't make sense to change it

U Havin a giggle lad

Also what e5 mentioned is a good thing. If to are left wondering what the true representative rep of a post is you will not be so easily swayed to blindly rep it. Xx


~~from phone

[FlyingJesus]

It it seems anyone who is against your opinion gets fired upon. I'm perfectly entitled to my opinion as you are and more then capable of reading. My reply in the other thread made perfeg sense - I don't think negative reps should be shown/deductive or whatever on the forum what so ever. That's my OPINION (which I am entitled to with being shot down).

Personally i I think it just confuses how many +reps a user has actually receives when a -rep takes it down... I'd rather just know how many positive reps a post receives rather than wondering of that's a true amount as they may be been -repped.

HOW DARE I REFUTE STUPID POSTS wow such an evil person, and sure it made sense as in the words made a sentence, but it did not include any reasons why which is important. Your explanation in this post and next one is less an opinion and more simply being wrong in that you're claiming an aggregate of both plus and minus is somehow less indicative of the forum's overall view of a post than showing only the positives, which is clearly not in any way true. Essentially you're saying (in both parts of your post) that criticisms of anything are never valid

You are not entitled to having your public statements accepted without question, stop being such a child

I voted no. I can see the reasoning behind changing it but I don't think that it makes sense to change it.

That doesn't even make sense lol

[Alkaz]

...I can see why you would want to change it. I just think it could make things more confusing, and unless you go around monitoring what +rep each post has then you're not really going to know if it is -repped anyway. For what I think is such a small thing, it would cause a lot of confusion and doesn't make sense to add it IMO. If they add a counter for -rep then yeah change it, but if not then keep things as they are.

[FlyingJesus]

The point isn't to know the exact numbers, it's to show the genuine amount of support a post has rather than potentially ignoring the opinions of a lot of people as the current system does

[Alkaz]

But surely then if you have 6+ reps on a post and someone -reps it, it will only display +5 reps, one of those +reps is being ignored and isn't a true representation of the rep received (positive or negative) for any post.

[FlyingJesus]

It's not being ignored, it's being counted in the total. The main reason for doing this is so that we stop having posts where someone has attacked someone or given an openly intolerant response of some kind and gets a few people +repping it and having that post displayed as something everyone approves of regardless of how many people have -repped it, as this shows negative behaviour as something that gets rewarded

[Kyle]

But surely then if you have 6+ reps on a post and someone -reps it, it will only display +5 reps, one of those +reps is being ignored and isn't a true representation of the rep received (positive or negative) for any post.

but it is a truer representation than a post with 6 visible +reps and x amount of invisible -reps.

[Alkaz]

Not really, because then you have invisible +reps and invisible -reps. Like I just said, unless you track +reps on each post, you're not going to know either way if a post has been -repped.... why not just show both +reps and -reps