Spoilers

[Kardan]

Any film isn't OTT, it's only spoiler tags, not gonna ruin your life,

And it says plot lines, a neuclear warhead on america isn't a plotline.

Instead of flaming me why not just amend my post? :S

My bad, must of overread the 'plot points'.

[Plank]

I don't see why every post in a thread has spoilers in it, a simple "this thread contains spoilers" in the title should do. When people see the warning in the title, they will know the thread has spoilers and will avoid it. If they open a thread which has "SPOILERS" in the title then it's their own fault if they see spoilers.

That's what I don't understand^^

[Coldplay]

Because people might want to discuss the programme as a whole? Or post their opinions on what they think might happen?

[-Eyeless-]

In some cases it is fair because those threads have people talking about how good or bad something is, so while somebody wants to know about how good a film or Tv program is they still don't want it "spoiled"

[GommeInc]

In some cases it is fair because those threads have people talking about how good or bad something is, so while somebody wants to know about how good a film or Tv program is they still don't want it "spoiled"

That's crazy, if people don't want to know, don't view the threads. They shouldn't view the threads, it's obvious that film discussions are going to giveaway plot points, what else would they talk about "/ If you have to change anything, change the description to such forums to remind people about common sense, that threads are more than likely going to "spoil" the film/book/show for you...

[-Eyeless-]

That's crazy, if people don't want to know, don't view the threads. They shouldn't view the threads, it's obvious that film discussions are going to giveaway plot points, what else would they talk about "/ If you have to change anything, change the description to such forums to remind people about common sense...

Yes but people talk about how good a film was it is totally fine to look at the thread if you want to find out what people think but that shouldn't mean they have to see plot spoilers...

[Kardan]

Yes but people talk about how good a film was it is totally fine to look at the thread if you want to find out what people think but that shouldn't mean they have to see plot spoilers...

So if I say Titanic sunk because of an iceberg, I'd have to spoiler it?

[Plank]

Why do you have to make obscene posts like that? This is a mature discussion, about the rule, which needs to be amended.

:rolleyes:

In some cases it is fair because those threads have people talking about how good or bad something is, so while somebody wants to know about how good a film or Tv program is they still don't want it "spoiled"

Everything was fine before spoilers. A simple "SPOILERS" in the title of the thread was enough. People are obviously going to avoid the thread if it contains spoilers.

[-Eyeless-]

So if I say Titanic sunk because of an iceberg, I'd have to spoiler it?

No because that is common sense, however if you said "The main character paints a portrait of her naked and they fall in love," then that is more likely to be spoilered... And No I don't know the whole storyline of the titanic lol

[GommeInc]

Yes but people talk about how good a film was it is totally fine to look at the thread if you want to find out what people think but that shouldn't mean they have to see plot spoilers...

They will, because what else will you talk about in a film thread?

"It was good"
"I suspected that"

Bland comments. People will talk about how X killed Y and how X fell madly in love with Z but didn't realise Y was a mutant. Forcing people to spoil their own threads (and I mean spoiler tag and spoil as in ruin their threads) because someone hasn't got common sense to realise that if people are talking about Prince Caspian they are going to see plot lines that will spoil it for them. I don't even think that happens :S