Staff Returning

[Shar]

Then people would complain it's unfair when people come from other sites and instantly get to the top, ignoring everyone else who was at Habbox in the first place. You just can't win!

I guess its just based on opinions!

[despect]

But that takes time. And people have been saying it shouldn't be based on time? Lol. Of course dedication is part of it, but that takes time to prove - you can't be "dedicated" after 1 week. That might just be a show to try and impress.

As I said, you have to get a balance - experience, dedication and skill. Experience - pretty easy to find out, ask people, or get them to apply. Dedication - again easy, just watch people, how much they help out in the department etc. Skill - again easy to monitor - watch their activity, how good they do their job etc.

I think it's unfair to put people ahead of other people because they were good before. It's not then, it's now. It CAN work, but leaving is just showing a LACK of dedication in my opinion - unless leaving for family matters, it shows they couldn't be bothered to find the time or effort to put into habbox.

I've just left my habbox role, does that mean i'm showing a lack of dedication after working at habboxlive department for what a year (i think) havent actually counted .

O/T: I think its about whats best for the department if someone is brought back to a high role then it obviously means the general management team and the department manager and or the assistant have trust in that person that they will do a good job.

[triston220]

This really isn't always the case I don't think. If the members that resigned is more suitable for the job than another member then they should get it.

Off topic: Aren't we all colourful:



.

[Conservative,]

I've just left my habbox role, does that mean i'm showing a lack of dedication after working at habboxlive department for what a year and a half? :S

O/T: I think its about whats best for the department if someone is brought back to a high role then it obviously means the general management team and the department manager and or the assistant have trust in that person that they will do a good job.

Not necessarily, but I know why etc. If you leave because "you can't be bothered" then obviously that's not showing dedication

(The underlined bit): Who says they're always right? :S

[despect]

Not necessarily, but I know why etc. If you leave because "you can't be bothered" then obviously that's not showing dedication

(The underlined bit): Who says they're always right? :S

isnt that about taking a risk, if that person has been in the role before then they know what they are doing if they then return to not do their job properly then they won't be staff for much longer, will they?

[Conservative,]

isnt that about taking a risk, if that person has been in the role before then they know what they are doing if they then return to not do their job properly then they won't be staff for much longer, will they?

But why give them a chance again? Maybe they left because they didn't get one with people?

It depends on circumstances I guess. But I think you need to make sure everyone who wants the promotion is given a fair look at. Not just "Oh yeah, he was good last time, lets promote him after 1 day" etc.

[Grig]

But why give them a chance again? Maybe they left because they didn't get one with people?

It depends on circumstances I guess. But I think you need to make sure everyone who wants the promotion is given a fair look at. Not just "Oh yeah, he was good last time, lets promote him after 1 day" etc.

This is what is done at Habbox when it comes to promotions. Habbox looks at all the possible options and see who is best fit for the promotion and would do the best job. Sometimes these discussions can last quite a while ;p.

[despect]

But why give them a chance again? Maybe they left because they didn't get one with people?

It depends on circumstances I guess. But I think you need to make sure everyone who wants the promotion is given a fair look at. Not just "Oh yeah, he was good last time, lets promote him after 1 day" etc.

i think when they let people back they will obviously look at people in the department and think "oh is there anyone who is already staff that could do the role well enough" if there isnt someone who could take up that role, then why not bring that person back? when bringing someone back they will look at what they've done for the department in the past to see if they actually deserve the role. They wouldnt bring back someone if they didnt deserve the role lol.

[Conservative,]

This is what is done at Habbox when it comes to promotions. Habbox looks at all the possible options and see who is best fit for the promotion and would do the best job. Sometimes these discussions can last quite a while ;p.

But what if the best person doesn't want it? And what if they're NOT the best person? You cannot KNOW for sure, you may THINK, but you cannot KNOW, because they're could be an underdog who is actually the next ,Jess, but no one knows because it's a continual stream of ex-Seniors being re-promoted.

If you want my fix to it:

Ex-Senior staff should not be allowed promotion for a month after coming back, unless stated otherwise by Jin or GMs...

[xxMATTGxx]

But what if the best person doesn't want it? And what if they're NOT the best person? You cannot KNOW for sure, you may THINK, but you cannot KNOW, because they're could be an underdog who is actually the next ,Jess, but no one knows because it's a continual stream of ex-Seniors being re-promoted.

If you want my fix to it:

Ex-Senior staff should not be allowed promotion for a month after coming back, unless stated otherwise by Jin or GMs...

Most of the time we have a list of different candidates and then we choose the one who will do the best for the department and who deserves it and so on. If that candidate does not want the job for whatever reason, we can pick another person from our list. Plus, not everyone will agree on every single promotion decision but at the end of the day it is up to management.