Next-Gen iPhone (iPhone 5?)

[GommeInc]

SNIP

And another lengthy response I see

Who are you benefitting with droning on about how I apparently said you were happy Apple inconvenience their users? As we estalblished ages ago, I didn't say that so that matter is no longer relevant. Just give that a rest. I clearly didn't say it, so why carry on explaning it?

"You don't understand economics because you think companies like Apple do things to ultimately prove points, not make money...." - Point me to this post. I never mentioned economics, so how do you know I don't understand it? It's like pointing at a random stranger and telling me they don't understand sex. As I keep saying (but your inability to read overlooks it), I didn't mention it because Tomm and I were not having an economics debate, you came in protecting Apple for no reason and destroyed thread #2.

And mentioning Alzheimers in a thread isn't just pathetic and pointless, it is also disgusting. You are disgusting and incredibly low for mentioning it.

[HotelUser]

And another lengthy response I see

Hypocrite as per usual

----

Who are you benefitting with droning on about how I apparently said you were happy Apple inconvenience their users? As we estalblished ages ago, I didn't say that so that matter is no longer relevant. Just give that a rest. I clearly didn't say it, so why carry on explaning it?

Okay hold on, first of all, and for like the 8th time, NOBODY is happy Apple uses those cables, and it would protect the consumer MORE if they used STANDARD cables.

2. YOURE MAKING ASSUMPTIONS IN THINKING I SAID YOU SAID THAT I WAS HAPPY WITH APPLES CORDS BECAUSE I NEVER ONCE SAID THAT MYSELF, I ASKED YOU TO TELL ME WHERE I SAID I WAS HAPPY WITH THE CORDS, IN RESPONSE TO YOU TELLING ME THEY HURT THE CONSUMERS

This entire problem stems from you seeing this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" and thinking I'm saying somebody is happy about the adapters. NOBODY is happy about the adapters. As I said in my six previous posts, that quote was a reply to this: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?". You suck at reading.

This entire problem stems from you seeing this: "Point out in my post where I stated I am happy about Apple using different adapters" and thinking I'm saying somebody is happy about the adapters. NOBODY is happy about the adapters. As I said in my six previous posts, that quote was a reply to this: "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?". You suck at reading.

Another example of poor old Gomme not understanding how to read. Me saying that WAS IN RESPONSE TO YOU SAYING "Weren't you the one preaching in another thread about how customers ought to be protected?" do you not remember accusing me of being a hypocrite? Jeez Gomme. Read my now SEVEN other posts which explain what this was in response to.

Get it through your thick skull that I don't think whatever the hell it is you think I think.

----

"You don't understand economics because you think companies like Apple do things to ultimately prove points, not make money...." - Point me to this post.

They could, but they like to inconvenience their users for the sake of individualism

|-)

----

I never mentioned economics, so how do you know I don't understand it?

You don't understand economics because you think companies like Apple do things to ultimately prove points, not make money....

It's possible you don't know anything about economics so I'll spell it out again for you, companies like to make money.

Do you know why I said for individualism? Because I was speaking from the point of view of the customer, which was what Tomm and I were discussing the view point of

I'm a consumer and I think Apple only does it to make money. If you think as a consumer that they do it promote individualism then that's the stupidest view I've ever heard. They do it to make money and they make money from doing it, simples.

|-)|-)

----

And mentioning Alzheimers in a thread isn't just pathetic and pointless, it is also disgusting. You are disgusting and incredibly low for mentioning it.

I think it's incredibly disgusting to joke about Alzheimers

It's a good thing only one of us is being pathetic and immature:

As per usual, your failure to read is your one and only weakness, and causes yet another pointless discussion in a thread because "you're too serious" and defensive of Apple (this post is evident of it). Point out the part in my post where I said you were happy Apple did this. You would notice I didn't say this, mainly because you cast aspersions and merely make assumptions because you seem to really like pointless discussions and have the ineptitude to read. Well done David, this is thread two you've derailed.


You would notice a -rep which should act as a sign that your reputation as being reasonable and logical in your approach to discussions is in tatters. Also, well done ignoring most of my post yet again and only reading what you want to read (which isn't there). Jeez.


From now on I won't "Feed the Troll", as you clearly have no interest in reading any posts, and I honestly do not have the energy to further belittle you.

|-)|-)|-)

----

[GommeInc]

I see I've won this argument as you've resorted to using horrendous diseases and insults to win your argument. You did accuse me of saying that I think you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter, by asking me to point out in your post whereyou said you were happy they did this and why I think you thought this (Post #37), accused me of thinking Apple only do it to annoy their customers for the sake of individualism (Post #39) and pretended that my comment about consumer protection was about you being happy that Apple inconenvenience their customers (Post #50).

This whole thread would of been interesting if you didn't assume so much and have a blind devotion to Apple. Tomm and I were quite happily discussing the inconvenience they bring to charging phones (I can't lend a friend my spare micro-USB if they use an iPhone, a few times this has happened). You were the one that assumed economics isn't a factor, when our discussion wasn't concerned with it.

/end of thread

[HotelUser]

I see I've won this argument

Gomme has spoken and thus it must be law binding and true.

You did accuse me of saying that I think you're happy Apple use a seperate adapter

I asked you to point out to me where I said I was happy about it because you asked me if I was the one preaching about consumerism and protecting consumers in another thread. Refer to my following posts where I explain this:

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...64#post7649564
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...08#post7647508
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...94#post7648194
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...85#post7648585
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...92#post7648692
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...28#post7648728
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...53#post7648753
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...83#post7648783
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...58#post7648858
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...03#post7649403
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...92#post7649492
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...64#post7649564

So please for the love of god shut up about the quote. I've explained exactly what I meant by it in now 13 different posts and if you choose to reject my explanation that's not my problem and you have to live with that.

This whole thread would of been interesting if you didn't assume so much and have a blind devotion to Apple. Tomm and I were quite happily discussing the inconvenience they bring to charging phones (I can't lend a friend my spare micro-USB if they use an iPhone, a few times this has happened). You were the one that assumed economics isn't a factor, when our discussion wasn't concerned with it.

I'm happy for you that you were happy being a little anti-apple birdie but seeing you think Apple uses custom adapters for individualism made me half hysterically, and I just couldn't resist pointing out the large magnitude to which you were dead wrong.

/end of thread

HURR DURR:

I'm not a moderator, super moderator or member of management

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypocrite

[samsaBEAR]

**** me, I love arguing on the internet as much as the next dude but you guys just need to cool your jets or take it to PMs

[HotelUser]

**** me, I love arguing on the internet as much as the next dude but you guys just need to cool your jets or take it to PMs

It's not even an argument anymore. He keeps saying the same thing over and over and I keep sending him previous posts where I've already addressed what he's said. I'd be really excited if he decided to advance his conversation further, but as it stands he's just a giant broken record.

[mrwoooooooo]

It's not even an argument anymore. He keeps saying the same thing over and over and I keep sending him previous posts where I've already addressed what he's said. I'd be really excited if he decided to advance his conversation further, but as it stands he's just a giant broken record.

you're both a giant broken record saying the same things over and over. no-one currs

[HotelUser]

you're both a giant broken record saying the same things over and over. no-one currs

He apparently does, and he's repeating himself without realizing it, I'm repeating myself by slapping my previous quotes into my replies to demonstrate the fact that he's just repeating himself.

p.s. Your signature is amazing, I hate joff and I loved that scene in the series

[GommeInc]

How does me saying I am not a super moderator, moderator or member a management make me a hypocrite exactly? *raises eyebrow* I think you need to look up the definition of "hypocrite" again (and he calls me stupid |-))

Also, you and I were only repeating ourselves because you thought I said you were happy Apple inconvenience their customers (which was disproven immediately) and you think that I only believe Apple do it for individualistic reasons (which again was disproven immediately). The argument only went on for 4 pages because you're hot headed and protective.

[HotelUser]

How does me saying I am not a super moderator, moderator or member a management make me a hypocrite exactly? *raises eyebrow* I think you need to look up the definition of "hypocrite" again (and he calls me stupid |-))

Because you said you aren't a moderator, and then later on you said /end thread. You're not the OP, or a moderator as you told me yourself so you cant close a thread. It was playful of me to say that on my part, yet you take everything so seriously. Why so serious son?

Also, you and I were only repeating ourselves because you thought I said you were happy Apple inconvenience their customers (which was disproven immediately) and you think that I only believe Apple do it for individualistic reasons (which again was disproven immediately). The argument only went on for 4 pages because you're hot headed and protective.

You were repeating yourself because you decided you'd reply to the thread like 8 times without actually having read it. My replies where I reply to you with previous quotes of my own speak for themselves